Daily page views of User and User talk pages | |||||
User
User Talk
|
|
|
The article Knowledge Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
no indication of meeting notability guidelines. The references given are largely primary sources or directory listings and the one that is not is just reporting a press conference from the company. Google searches not finding any WP:significant coverage in WP:reliable sources
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
noq (
talk) 16:08, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
J. Philip Vincent, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
noq (
talk) 16:16, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. -- rchard2scout ( talk) 09:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)