Hello, I'm Chris1834. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Fred Phelps because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Chris1834 Talk 23:25, 19 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fred Phelps, you may be blocked from editing. Martin451 23:31, 19 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Martin451 23:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC) reply

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Fred Phelps. — Frosty ☃ 01:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

-- j⚛e decker ^talk 02:10, 20 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Fred Phelps has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Fred Phelps was changed by Marypg (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862644 on 2014-09-01T10:41:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 10:41, 1 September 2014 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  -- Bongwarrior ( talk) 10:47, 1 September 2014 (UTC) reply