Hello, Mandeepauch. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Billy Pauch, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Billy Pauch, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Who you claim to be is irrelevant. Who you are is irrelevant. Our content is paraphrased from reliable secondary sources. We are not interested in what you know. You also have no control over this article based on who you claim to be. That will not change if you were to confirm who you. You clearly do not understand what Wikipedia is or how one should go about editing it. In your case, you should not be editing the article linked here at all, but rather you should propose changes (providing reliable published secondary sources) on the article's talk page. Thanks John from Idegon ( talk) 16:02, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you're having some difficulties trying to edit Billy Pauch. I recommend that you post on Talk:Billy Pauch, include your sources and suggested changes, and an editor interested in that topic can help with formatting and citations. Good luck! Schazjmd (talk) 21:14, 30 January 2020 (UTC)