This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 49 | 3 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I would strongly discourage this. Schools have each a different range of available sources and deserve individual consideration. If you multiple list then you risk a train smash. I would also suggest you should carry out a Google News check (including archives) before listing any school. TerriersFan ( talk) 03:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Setting new lows in thank-you spam:
Janitor's new tools
Spam must stop -- will
new mop act?
Ooops, .com
blocked
New admin, new tools
Earnest newbie furrows brow
Fare thee well
Main Page
New mess all about
Sorcerer's Apprentice mop
Not supporter's fault
A. B. so grateful
Wikipedia trembles
Watch out
DRV
A. B. wonders why
Copyright always confused
Fair use, farewell, bye
Qatar is
blocked
Shucks those
range blocks are tricky!
Will get it straight soon.
Dear RfA friend,
I will learn, chaos will fade
Thanks so much ...
A. B.
"Fine editor, will show good judgement" [1] ... let's hope so!
So far the the
Main Page is still there and
I haven't yet blocked the nation of Qatar.
--
A. B.
(talk) 22:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Dear Malinaccier,
Thank you for your participation in my request for adminship, which ended successfully with a final tally of (52/10/1). I was impressed by the thoughtful comments on both sides, and the RFA process in general. The extra buttons do look pretty snazzy, but I'll be careful not to overuse them. If you have advice to share or need assistance with anything, feel free to drop me a message or email. Thank you and good day!
Cordially,
—
xDanielx
T/
C\
R 06:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 50 | 10 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 07:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I created this article, then saw your note at one of the deletion debates for the Fairfax County middle schools in which, if I read it right, you said you might do the same thing. Please feel free to look over my work and make whatever changes you think appropriate. I'm not enthusiastic about the new list, but it seems to me a better alternative than losing all the information when the various articles are deleted. If I'd seen your note first, I'd have left it to you to create the list.
Noroton (
talk) 02:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm coaching User:JavaTenor right now, but it's perfectly okay with me. bibliomaniac 1 5 03:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Your name is listed on Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Status as fully available, and I was wondering if you were still available, and could coach me? I would understand if you couldn't. Thanks! Malinaccier ( talk) 01:50, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
-- Michael Greiner 19:02, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
<font=3> Thanks for your support, my
request for adminship passed 62/0/0 yesterday!
I want to thank Snowolf and Dincher for nominating me, those who updated the RfA tally, and everyone for their support and many kind words. I will do my best to use the new tools carefully and responsibly (and since you are reading this, I haven't yet deleted your talk page by accident!). Please let me know if there is anything I can do to be of assistance, and keep an eye out for a little green fish with a mop on the road to an even better encyclopedia. Thanks again and take care, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 16:52, 15 December 2007 (UTC) |
---|
Can you leave pointless questions just for a laugh? (occasionaly) F 9 T 20:44, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 51 | 17 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 19:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi there! Thanks very much for your support on my recent RfA, which was successful. I appreciate your comments and participation, and intend to use the tools carefully and for the betterment of the encyclopedia. Thanks again! Tony Fox (arf!) 05:55, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 52 | 26 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 13:32, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Dear Malinaccier, here is a little note to say thank you for your kind support on my request for adminship which succeeded with a final result of (72/19/6).
Now that I am a sysop, do not hesitate to contact me with any queries you have. I would be glad to help you along with the other group of kind and helpful administrators.
Thank you again and I look forward to editing alongside you in the future. — E talk 12:25, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
I've asked more questions. I thought you may want to read his answers. The Transhumanist 00:19, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed your request for a coach over at Admin coaching, and I'm available.
Keep in mind that I'm not an admin - I've been through 3 intense RfAs (so far), and therefore I understand the process well, though I have not yet overcome the stigma of conflicts I was engaged in early in my participation here (which occurred over a year ago, also, if you want to see what not to do in an RfA, see my first two). But I am an admin coach, and have co-coached 5 users who have become admins, 4 of whom I co-nominated for adminship in their successful RfAs, and strongly endorsed the other as her admin coach. I have experience over a wide range of activities, and I'd say my general approach is progressive and direct.
If you do not currently have an admin coach, I would be glad to be your coach. I do have a few conditions though, and they are that you...
Please let me know if you agree, and we can get started.
I look forward to your reply.
The Transhumanist 05:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support in my successful RFA. AliveFreeHappy ( talk) 07:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for some suggestions for an admin. I have started work on articles for deletion, and sadly, the Auto-Wiki browser is not working. Thanks for your opinion! Ohmpandya ( Talk) 00:51, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
In the future, when someone is reverting multiple instances of vandalism to an article, as I was to Brett Papworth , you might consider allowing them sufficient time (at least a minute or two) to finish up the vandalism reversions before re-reverting the interim changes immediately. It would help quite a bit to keep the mess down. Thank you. -- Michael Devore ( talk) 01:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, publication order is definitely better. I can't believe I hadn't noticed that. Definitely go ahead and change it. Glass Cobra 01:51, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |