— Spaceman Spiff 15:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Goud Saraswat Brahmin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush ( talk) 16:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Goud Saraswat Brahmin. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing.
Stop edit warring on Goud Saraswat Brahmin to insert badly sourced material, or you will be blocked from editing or banned from editing Indian topics. I see you added one more footnote in your last edit, but unfortunately it links to a 404 Not Found page, at least where I am — Google Books is not the same everywhere. See User:Uncle G/On common Google Books mistakes. Please start by reading some reliable sources and then summarize them for Wikipedia; don't insist on your own version and then try to support it by searching Google Books for the terms you want to connect. Sitush has started a discussion on the article talkpage; please make your argument there instead of edit warring. Bishonen | talk 20:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC).
For repeated disruptive editing including edit warring to add original research, synthesis and POV, I have decided, in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the terms of this community discussion, to impose the following sanction on you:
indefinitely topic banned from editing about castes, social groups, etc of South Asia anywhere on the English Wikipedia; this includes anywhere on articles, talk pages, user and user talk pages, categories, templates and anything else on the English Wikipedia
This sanction has been logged at
Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the
banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be
blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction to the community at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me on my talk page, before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. — Spaceman Spiff 00:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
Spaceman
Spiff 16:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC){{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
Spaceman
Spiff 17:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC){{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
Spaceman
Spiff 04:35, 5 October 2017 (UTC)