From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Economy of Serbia Information

Why are you adding 2020 GDP estimates? KREOH ( talk) 15:51, 5 February 2020 (UTC) reply

April 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm Vanjagenije. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Serbian Armed Forces, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 2021 AIBA World Boxing Championships, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. TheImaCow ( talk) 19:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC) reply

May 2020

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Economy of Serbia, you may be blocked from editing. byteflush Talk 00:08, 7 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Didn't preview the template, my bad, but you are adding content that isn't supported by the source. Furthermore, as I mentioned in my edit summary, sources go into the article, not in edit summaries. I'm also warning you that you're past WP:3RR; you have been reverted by multiple editors (including me). Please start a discussion on article's talk page and don't add that content until a consensus is reached. byteflush Talk 00:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC) reply
I went ahead and created a section on the talk page here for you byteflush Talk 01:45, 7 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Decommunization in Serbia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Decommunization in Serbia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. - Flori4nK T A L K 01:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Use talk pages and don't include content not supported by inline refs

Please stop using edit summaries for sourcing. That is NOT the way to do it. If you don't know how to add a source to a claim, then you should probably refrain from editing the article directly and use the talk page to ask other editors for help. So far, you have no edits in Talk, or even User_Talk namespace. This has got to stop, if you want to contribute to an encyclopedia, you have got to work with other editors. Clearly you have at least some basic grasp of English, so I don't see why you don't discuss your edits at the appropriate place (or ask for help in adding refs).

Also, please don't change sourced historical information because you found a newer figure elsewhere. Once again - if you're unsure how to edit an article, ask on Talk page. byteflush Talk 02:30, 10 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Publish

Could you please publish article /info/en/?search=User:Tonyuk90/Western_Balkans_Six_(WB6) ? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonyuk90 ( talkcontribs) 17:37, 9 August 2020 (UTC) reply