Hello, Lucasvalpreda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tomás Giovanetti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:54, 23 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Lucasvalpreda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Tomás Giovanetti".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:57, 7 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tomás Giovanetti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarcGarver ( talk) 15:01, 26 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Lucasvalpreda! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MarcGarver ( talk) 15:01, 26 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see this guide for adding in-line citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tomás Giovanetti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 ( talk) 14:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tomás Giovanetti. Thanks! InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs) 18:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tomás Giovanetti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomás Giovanetti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:23, 26 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi Lucas. You shouldn't really have moved the Tomás Giovanetti page back to draft as it was subject to AfD, which is a process - editors reach a consensus as to what to do with the article. I think everything's settled down now (and the resulting mess from your move should now be cleaned up, I think) but moving pages in Wikipedia, unless you're sure about what you're doing, can be very messy from an administrative point of view. Anyway, the article is back in draftspace now where you can work on it without fear of deletion. If you want to resubmit it through the Articles for Creation process, ping me when you do. Also, you can always get help from the folks over at the WP:TEAHOUSE if you want to check how things work before you implement them. BTW, if you have a conflict of interest ( WP:COI) it's always best to declare that. In any case, all the best of luck - Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 15:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC) reply