I do not check this page regularly. If you have a message that requires my attention, write it both here and in
an email.
I cannot help with issues about archiving your own talk page. If you have read
the documentation carefully and are still having problems, a prompt and friendly answer can usually be found by asking at
the teahouse.
Hi. The bot has recently on two occasions tried to archive a discussion still ongoing as a valid part of the
Deaths in 2024 article, namely this section. Could you please ensure that this section remains for the forseeable future? Thanks.
Ref(chew)(do) 21:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
(
talk page watcher) @
Refsworldlee: As I've pointed out before, lowecase sigmabot III has no way of knowing if a discussion is still ongoing or not, it goes purely on the most recent timestamp in the thread, compared against the archiving settings. In this case, the top of the page has a {{
User:MiszaBot/config}} containing the parameter |algo=old(40d) so anything where the most recent timestamp is more than 40 days ago is eligible for archiving. In this case the most recent timestamp is 13:19, 9 March 2024 (UTC), which is 45 days ago - so the thread has been eligible for archiving since 13:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC). You should either amend the archiving settings to a longer period, or get people to actually add posts to this "ongoing" discussion.
On a related matter, if you revert a bot's archiving edit, you must also remove the thread concerned from the archives. You have not done that, and so the same thread now appears twice at
Talk:Deaths in 2024/Archive 1, although there are differences between the versions. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 21:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Sorry, I had no idea this issue had been clarified before. And I should indeed have checked the relevant Archive to revert that. Thanks for sorting that out, and I will be more diligent next time (if there is a next time). (If you look at the talk page edit history, you will see that names are being added to its list of outstanding unreferenced deaths regularly, and then removed regularly once they are sourced, so there is fairly regular activity.) Once again, thanks.
Ref(chew)(do) 21:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Refsworldlee: Perhaps you could consider signing each new addition, so that the most recent timestamp does not remain at 13:19, 9 March 2024 (UTC). --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 21:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I think I will add that proviso to the list, good idea. Thanks again.
Ref(chew)(do) 23:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
General archiving not occurring
Lowercase sigmabot III last did an archiving run through regular pages on 25 April. Does it need a reset or special encouragement to resume doing such runs daily? (Sorry; I don't do Wikipedia email; if someone else would like to in order to get Σ's attention, that's fine.) It has continued to archive the Administrators' noticeboard and Incidents pages at midnight and noon daily, but that's all. Thanks for getting the bot working again.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 01:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I went ahead left him a message.
Safiel (
talk) 16:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the notice. I've kicked it again and added a workaround in case this issue happens again. —
The Earwig (
talk) 04:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply
You asked "Is Lowercase sigmabot III working or has it been retired?", without saying which pages were not being archived. I asked for examples: you provided just one, where Lowercase sigmabot III demonstrably is working. If you can't supply any other cases where Lowercase sigmabot III is not archiving as it ought, I can only assume that it is working as intended. One thing is absolutely certain: it is not retired, as a
simple check of its contribs would have told you before you posted here. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 20:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
You may want to consider using the
Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that
User talk:89.85.243.55/sandbox/archive, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the
criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request
here.
Nickps (
talk) 21:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)reply