This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
[Update] After some discussion with other tech guys at Reddit I think I will leave the name of the draft as is. Eventually google and other search engines will start to index "moleculer" and they will stop assuming that it's a typo.
[Original] Hey Lance. A couple of weeks ago I've created a draft article but now I'm thinking that its name might not be the best. I'll try to explain why. The draft is called "Moleculer" (it's a microservices framework). However, when googling for "Moleculer" the search engine assumes that it's a typo and searches for "molecular" with an "A". As a result it shows a lot of biology related results. So, this time search engine indexing algorithms are not helping at all.
To avoid this issue and to, somewhat, provide better search results I was thinking to change the name of the draft to "Moleculer (microservices framework)". What do you think? Would it help?
PS: I've also added some references (including an IEEE article) to the draft as you've asked.
AndMaz ( talk) 20:18, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Liance,
Good day!
I really need your help as the comment you've made regarding the secondary/reliable source. I've included links from reliable websites that reviewed the dbWatch company. And I don't have any secondary sources but only those websites mentioned in my article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonysy191 ( talk • contribs) 11:16, 7 October 2019 (UTC) How can I workaround with this issue?
Your feedback will be very much appreciated
Thank you very much!
Best Regards,
Tony
Thank you for the advice
Gang 5g (
talk) 08:40, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
My article of e-commerce platform was rejected. E-commerce and e-commerce platform are two different topics. The article with title 'E-commerce platform' was one of the requested articles on Wikipedia. The second reason you mentioned was link farm to two websites. I took the idea from the websites and then wrote in my own words. Another thing that can be done is to include my article under E-commerce. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smitpshah17 ( talk • contribs) 03:08, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Lian,
I has been trying to publish the SYSML Version 1.5 document to the wikipedia website (1 September 2019) and did not get your approval since it is a copy right document. Do you mind if I send you the permission message from the copy right owner? I already loaded that permission message from the owner of that wikipedia document but you might not see it somehow. I try to share this information to the wiki audience so they can learn the new method and specification to work on Model Based System Engineering. Also after I get your approval to publish it, I will modify the format to make it more user friendly using the anchor command and hyperlink. Please let me know how I can send the original owner message to you. Note that if this option fails I think the only option left is the owner to load the document to Wikipedia by himself.
Thanks.
V/r CDR Charles Nguyen, USN — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jolenep99 ( talk • contribs) 16:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello Liance, I was hoping you could take a look at my article again. It has not been viewed for a month and a half. If you have some time, I would love to get the chance again? Thank you! AleitheaAnne ( talk) 21:42, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello. There has been a confusion about my draft and the article Luis Dato. I am quite new in the wikipedia and i did not know the rules well. i deeply apologize. I intentionally moved the Draft:Luis Dato to the Article section. The article has been revised by other contributors to a point that it was almost perfect. And then it was deleted. The worse thing is that a couple of websites has already reference (or copied) it. Anyway, I revised the Draft: Luis Dato to the wikipedia's standard. Please review it. Thank you so much. And I apologize again for the move. Stephentalla ( talk) 03:50, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
If you have the time to review and help me edit my article so it may get posted I'd greatly appreciate it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnny234424 ( talk • contribs) 16:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello!
My article has been declined several times now and i wonder as to why. Another user was claiming youtube links are not reliable source's - which is fair. Therefore i removed them and found as much credible sites as possible to back up the information. In this case its several clubs confirming the identity of a player in their records so i am not really sure what more information i can provide. I added youtube links so that the player can be seen playing for a club which should be the most credible source of all.
Please let me know how i can improve this article enough to get approved.
regards
And thats why i removed youtube links and only added very reliable sources, so the question still stands why is it not getting approved
regards
Liance, sorry to sound rude but your rejection of my HSCC submission is somewhat absurd. I suggest you consider other 'Journal' entries in Wikipedia and you will see that I have virtually copied HSCC in a similar style (as best I could). I shouldn't have to point out the obvious similarity for comparison, but if it is necessary, take a look at the 'Journal of Religion and Health' which I have helped to edit and which was improved again by another Wikipedia editor. References / links for verifiability have been included - LC — Preceding unsigned comment added by LinzCarey ( talk • contribs) 15:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Liance, please note the official Health and Social Care Chaplaincy (HSCC) website for the journal. https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/HSCC. I have tried my best to copy the lay out on Wikipedia as per a similar entry for the Journal of Religion and Health. Please assist me to get this HSCC page on Wikipedia up and running.
Thank you. This is the first article I've written, so I am still learning all the rights and wrongs. I appreciate your help! WendyRuss ( talk) 19:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi! first of all, I would like to thank you for reviewing my draft! ( draft:Gesa Credit Union) Secondly, I had a question. I wasn't quite sure if you said that the topic isn't significant enough, or if I just need second-party citations. Could you provide some clarity? Thanks again for taking your time to review and respond! Puddleglum2.0👌 ( talk) 02:51, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Yes it does, thanks a lot! Puddleglum2.0👌 ( talk) 14:17, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Liance (John) ... Thanks for the assistance with my draft submission. I've kept my submission rather short and sweet with as many quality references as I could so that I wouldn't overwhelm the process and clutter up my article. I look forward to being approved, or to making any necessary adjustments as you feel I need to. Thanks, Joey Lullwaterfan ( talk) 13:45, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks - I realized I didn't properly credit my references per Wikipedia's standards and was in the process of trying to figure out the proper technique, but you have shown me the correct links for future references. Can I still make new changes and edits while the page is being reviewed for submission??? Thank you, Joey Lullwaterfan ( talk) 14:35, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks John. I'm slowly making a few improvements - just linking a few names to web sites and going to try to insert a photo of the band too. I appreciate your assistance with the page. Hoping I fly through the submission process without much drama !!! - thanks, Joey Lullwaterfan ( talk) 13:17, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Liance (John) - Just resubmitted my article after making a suggested change ..... I'd appreciate it if you took a look at it. -Joey Thanks Lullwaterfan ( talk) 03:41, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Dear Liance,
I am aware that my article is not on a new topic, which is why it was declined. Where do I submit an article which I largely rewrote because the original one was a bad & wrong stub? It seems wrong to just paste the new version as I did for the ELBO.
Xenonoxid ( talk) 21:40, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Liance, thank you for moving my article to the draft section! Let me know if there are any changes you think I should make for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JabSVBS13 ( talk • contribs) 16:12, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
I checked over the sources to make sure everything is valid. Looks good. I'll wait and see if the other editors approve it. Thanks again! ~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by JabSVBS13 ( talk • contribs) 18:06, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Dear Liance, thank you very much for your support This is a draft version of the translation of the original text in French & published on wikipedia.fr — Preceding unsigned comment added by JPDeNeef ( talk • contribs) 12:19, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I made a page named Billy Kametz and I accidentally created it in the mainspace. Are you able to help me move it to a draft page please as I would believe that having it in the mainspace at this point of time wouldn't be appropriate. Thanks ahead. Arithmenick ( talk) 04:39, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
hi Liance,
Your colleague has deleted the draft you have moved from sandbox for me. I would have appreciated just knowing what was wrong, I would have gladly corrected it. Can you please help me.
Katdiamond2020 ( talk) 08:26, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Jansi mary S (talk) 03:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi madam/sir, Its me jansi , i need assets because Wikipedia is some thing new for me, and i refereed so many videos but none of them is clear on what i should do exactly , i wanted to publish on nursing documentation so that there will be at least somebody who can use this and it will be helpful in there day today activity i know there is a lot of mistakes but im ready-to correct my self , if it is published please delete it i will take your guideline improvise and come back again
My aim is to learn not to become famous
Thank you
Thanks for moving my article to drafts . I hope you consider it worthy of becoming a Wiki article. Thanking you in anticipation. Areesha fatima 700 ( talk) 10:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Liance , I hope you would help me regarding this question. How will my article become a wiki article ? I'm fairly new to this , and I still haven't grasped the ropes of it all. Please guide me regarding this. Areesha fatima 700 ( talk) 10:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
So sorry to disturb you , I know you have a lot to do , sorry to pester you again. I just want to ask something. 1) What does it mean that my article has been moved from sandbox to drafts ? 2) what else should I do to make my article more credible AMD more likely to be accepted ? 3) How much time will it take for my article to be com open to public ?
Kindly guide me . Areesha fatima 700 ( talk) 12:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, It's been a long since you reviewed the draft but I've I helped out the draft to establish notability. I think it's good to go now in mainspace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.113.79.85 ( talk) 23:46, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
== Thank yo
Thank you for guidance Areesha fatima 700 ( talk) 10:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi--thank you for your feedback. I am working on a larger article with more robust references that will satisfy Wiki's standards. Is it possible to accept the stub I submitted in the meantime until the longer article is ready?
macgirl (
talk) 21:35, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi again--please let me know at your earliest. I have developed a longer article with more references and sections but don't want to upload until I hear from you, since you were the one who made the decision on this entry. macgirl ( talk) 20:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Mixtape Madness, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:48, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Liance, I just found you and can you check this draft Draft:Yuri Kozukata, it has been for 2 months. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.194.199.230 ( talk) 07:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Since you evaluated the AFC draft at User:Abhirupmoitra93/sandbox/WhiteHat Jr, you may be interested in contributing to the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WhiteHat Jr. Regards, Peacock ( talk) 16:41, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello John, Thank you for your help. I'm new to Wikipedia. The page I created was deleted with some good edits, D8 and G12. I would like to fix and resubmit. Where can I find my deleted page to check links and to properly reference the website that was used for information? Henda Salmeron ( talk) 20:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Regina Morris Henda Salmeron ( talk) 20:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Regina Morris
Thanks, John for moving the my draft to the correct space. I look forward to hearing back on it's creation. I have referenced the Henda's Law website, the law is cited exactly how it reads. So hopefully we can see that it is not a copyright issue. Thanks again. ReginaMorris ( talk) 18:43, 11 November 2019 (UTC)Regina
Hi Liance,
Thank you for moving my article to the "Draft:Thomas Nail". The article has been rejected twice but no one has told me how to fix the issues. One comment suggests that academics need a "named chair" to be listed, which is clearly no the case for most entries. Another says I need reliable independent sources that are verifiable—but that was what I thought I just added with links to peer reviewed journals, etc. I am super confused. Other entries are way less supported than mine. Can you tell me specifically what I need to do here. Its all so mysterious.
Thank you for your feedback on "Draft:Thomas Nail". The article has been rejected twice but no one has told me how to fix the issues. One comment suggests that academics need a "named chair" to be listed, which is clearly no the case for most entries. Another says I need reliable independent sources that are verifiable—but that was what I thought I just added with links to peer reviewed journals, etc. I am super confused. Other entries are way less supported than mine. Can you tell me specifically what I need to do here? Its all so mysterious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanHSanborn (talk • contribs) 02:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Also: I read the wiki instructions and its pretty clear that the article meets at least one of the academic criteria listed: "The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the academic has been an author of highly cited academic work – either several extremely highly cited scholarly publications or a substantial number of scholarly publications with significant citation rates. Reviews of the person's work, published in selective academic publications, can be considered together with ordinary citations here. Differences in typical citation and publication rates and in publication conventions between different academic disciplines should be taken into account.
I have linked to google scholar and academia.edu to verify this. Thomas Nail has a book, The Figure of the Migrant, cited 285 times (which is a lot for philosophy books). He also fulfills the other named criteria of "unique" contribution that can be verified by reading the linked book review of Theory of the Border- where the reviewer clearly states the original and unique contribution of a whole new conceptual framework. Check it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanHSanborn (talk • contribs) 03:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Please read this: I am pasting here the explicit criteria on wikipedia for academic notability and precise how Thomas Nail satisfies this:
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability_(academics) Academics meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable.
1. The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.
"The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the academic has been an author of highly cited academic work – either several extremely highly cited scholarly publications or a substantial number of scholarly publications with significant citation rates. Reviews of the person's work, published in selective academic publications, can be considered together with ordinary citations here. Differences in typical citation and publication rates and in publication conventions between different academic disciplines should be taken into account. To count towards satisfying Criterion 1, citations need to occur in peer-reviewed scholarly publications such as journals or academic books. Publication and citation rates in humanities are generally lower than in sciences. Also, in sciences, most new original research is published in journals and conference proceedings whereas in humanities book publications tend to play a larger role (and are harder to count without access to offline libraries). The meaning of "substantial number of publications" and "high citation rates" is to be interpreted in line with the interpretations used by major research institutions in determining the qualifications for the awarding of tenure."
Here is how criteria number 1 is verified: a) follow the link "highly cited" to google scholar and see that there are several "highly cited" books and many well cited peer- reviewed articles. b) follow the academia.edu link at the bottom to see that Thomas Nail has over 4,000 followers with a quarter of a million downloads. c) when determining "highly cited" consider 1. that philosophy has much lower citation rates than the sciences, 2. that books are much more important that articles, and 3. that Thomas Nail is a tenured faculty, meaning that he has published enough to be considered to have made an impact in his field. d) view his CV on academia.edu to see the 10 books he has written and over 30 peer reviewed articles and major conferences and full range of interviews.
Let me know what you think — Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanHSanborn ( talk • contribs) 19:19, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks RyanHSanborn ( talk) 02:38, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
-- 171.60.226.136 ( talk) 04:32, 16 November 2019 (UTC)== Submission declined earlier - Content has been edited as per directions ==
Submission of content in link given below was declined by you. The content has been edited as per the observations/directions. Can you review the same for approval. /info/en/?search=User:Stiwarinetlink/sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chenjo9 ( talk • contribs) 12:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Amanda J Heath ( talk) 15:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)Hi Liane - thank you for your feedback regarding my first draft for Michael Holmes Jr. in October. I've since revised the entire piece to (hopefully) reflect the wikipedia guidelines. Since I've changed the piece to reflect paragraph format and subtitles. Is it best to create a new article as I'm not sure the correct way to reinsert the resources/citations? I'm concerned as I don't want to be declined again! Sorry, I'm new to wikipedia and having trouble understanding what to do next! Many thanks, Amanda Nov. 12, 2019 Amanda J Heath ( talk) 15:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Hallo, I see that you moved a sandbox article into Draft:Pac (village). You might like to have a look at WP:PLACEDAB: we disambiguate placenames by a wider placename, so I've moved this article (which another editor moved into mainspace) to Pac, Albania. I think we only use "(village)" etc if we need to distinguish between two or more places of same name and location but different status, eg a constituency, council area, village, etc. Thanks. Pam D 17:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback, I've have included more articles on the subject Draft:Felix_Barrett. MayWiki1 ( talk) 11:30, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Liance,
I submitted an article called John Lee for review in August, and I saw you looked at it on August 18, 2019. I was wondering when you think I'll get feedback on it.
Thanks!
I don't understand, how can the Russian wikipedia article already exist about this person (that I didn't create), yet when I try to make an English version of the page it gets shot down?
I understand the links I provided are mostly in Russian, but she is mentioned in all of them. What am I missing here?-- PBLB ( talk) 23:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Liance! I am new to wikipedia and I've submitted a draft titled Csaba Pal two month ago. I know you have tons of articles to review and sorry for being impatient, but is there a way to speed up the review process? Thank you for taking time to respond. Regards, Andreea
Avilock (
talk) 21:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
I have seen your review and would be very grateful for any assistance you can offer me with this article. Thank you in advance
Hi! You left a note on my article for Graduate Hotels that it felt like a conflict of interest when reading. I have since edited the piece to be more objective and included more citations from relevant news sources. Could you please review again? Would love to get my first page published!
Thank you,
Eagate23 ( talk) 15:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi I received a message about my draft - I am not clear as to what's happening, I wonder if there's been any development towards it being published. It has been months. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roxy334 ( talk • contribs) 22:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for helping me to locate the article on John F. Kilner for initial review. I received helpful feedback on it and have just edited and resubmitted it. But I could not tell if the resubmission went through. Can you verify if it did (in early January), and would you please let me know if it is in the right location to receive final approval? Thanks again! Guitargirl300 ( talk) 00:11, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Guitargirl300
Hi Liance. Thank you for reviewing my first attempt at a Wikipedia Page - I think I'm getting there slowly! I have just edited the draft on 'Population Data Science' so will await further comments in due course.
In the meantime, can you please help with a quick question? I have been inserting hyperlinks on a few words to link to other Wikipedia pages. However, when I preview the content, it is removing some of the words. For example 'personal data' is showing as just data, and 'record linkage' is showing as just linkage. I am using the full terminology when inserting the hyperlink so I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. If you have any suggestions I'd be really grateful. Many thanks
Hindleysl Hindleysl ( talk) 14:21, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks very much for your explanation of the location of my draft for the American Jujitsu Association, Liance...very much appreciate your help. Thomas Dineen III ( talk) 18:09, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
What's the procedure to convert it into a wikipedia page ? Areesha fatima 700 ( talk) 17:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Liance. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " QuPath".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 02:54, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi Liace. Thank you for evaluating the draft about Giovanni Dall'Orto. I think Dall'Orto is encyclopedic because he is a historian known internationally. He also did a lot of things that I didn't put on the page simply because... I'm not able to write it in English. He was the first Italian (but perhaps the first European) to write a book about AIDS, his history books have been translated into several languages, he is also quite well known as a photographer. The sources I used are not his web pages, they are by William Armstrong Percy III, Wikipink (a gay wiki encyclopedia) and googlescholar (where, by the way, he has an H index of 10, quite high considered the particular topic). There would be many other external sources that speak of him, but for laziness or incapacity I have not entered them; however there are numerous books, including English or American ones, like this one or this one. However, it is present on the Spanish Wikipedia (it wasn't I who put the page there), another sign of encyclopedicity. I am however available for all clarifications. -- Simpa2000 ( talk) 18:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
We have been adding updates to our article LIGO Documentary since you reviewed it six months ago and thought it was not validated in public media. We have added significant validation. It appears on your talk page there are no entries after October 2019. Are you still editing? Thanks very much. JGreene
JGreene20 (
talk) 08:12, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
JGreene20 (
talk) 08:12, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi, my submission for Enyo Sam was declined last year September. I have updated now can you check if it's ok? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enyosam100 ( talk • contribs) 15:27, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi there. You may be expecting this to come. Sorry if it bothers you but I'd just like to discuss the issue for improvement of draft. I recently created Boy & Dragon and I know it's kind of stub. Normally animations and cartoon do not receive that much of media coverage as other genres do. That's why I mentioned Animal Mechanicals and Brum (TV series) to get a clear idea how do things work in this category. Boy and Dragon has few independent references such as one from Sunderland Echo and other from Skwigly. I just want to discuss how do we improve pages in this category. Thank you for your time. Lunar Clock ( talk) 22:17, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for helping my Berklee students! Ijmusic ( talk) 20:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Liance,
I just got your notification about my article and would love to get some help on improving it the right way. I'm brand new here on Wikipedia and would like to learn to be able to contribute more! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtennysdotter ( talk • contribs) 18:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you, I really appreciate the feedback. I'll keep working on the article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtennysdotter ( talk • contribs) 00:29, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
I added some more sources but not sure if it's enough or if there's anything else I should add to improve it. Do you mind to take a look at it again? Thank you! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Mtennysdotter (
talk •
contribs) 18:55, 28 April 2020 (UTC)