Hello, Kringle Claus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Calgary did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- The Teahouse, our help forum for new users
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, visit the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. Magnolia677 ( talk) 15:33, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie ( talk) 00:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I took a look at your draft and made some changes. I think I have addressed any concerns about the article being used for promotion. Excessive detail about the site, whether intended or not, does come off as promotional. It is best to speak generally about the features of the site and its purpose. Since I am a contributor, I am not going to publish the article, as I feel this should be done by someone uninvolved, through the AfC process. Remember, you need to establish that your website passes WP:GNG - by being covered in-depth in multiple reliable sources. My one concern is that some of your sources deal with emails to Santa in general - for example, the Rosie O'Donnell song - unless I am missing something, the song is about emailing Santa, not about your specific website. If you have any questions, please let me know. I wish you luck. Cheers ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 20:17, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi KC, it's Félix. I have noticed that you are editing various Christmas- and Santa- related articles, and I noticed your remarks of me, thinking that I am trying to undermine your website, emailSanta.com. That is not true. I am just making sure that Wikipedia clarifies that Santa Claus does not exist, as the website is not censored to protect the feelings of children. I have no problems with you running a website outside of Wikipedia, but Wikipedia is meant to present objective truth and facts to readers based on reliable sources. There is no doubt that Santa Claus does not exist as a living person today and is merely a legendary character, and when kids come to Wikipedia to learn more about Santa Claus, this is what they should learn immediately. I do not have anything against Christmas or Christianity (in fact, I myself am Christian, and I am writing an essay on the origins of Santa Claus from St. Nicholas, the Roman Catholic church, etc. in my grade 12 philosophy class), however, I strongly disagree that an encyclopedia should try to use vague language to attempt to hide the fact that Santa does not exist from kids. Félix An ( talk) 01:53, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- By the way, I would also recommend you to read WP:SANTA. (I did not write that.) Thanks! Félix An ( talk) 04:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: EmailSanta.com
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Félix An ( talk) 05:56, 15 November 2020 (UTC)Merry Christmas! I hope you remember me. I wanted to re-live a part of my childhood today, so I "sent a letter to Santa Claus" using your website. :) I even made a little Python library so I could programmatically send emails, have a look: https://github.com/fffelix-jan/emailsanta-py Have a happy holiday season! Félix An ( talk) 00:04, 24 December 2021 (UTC)