![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 - up to 17 May 2007 |
Archive 2 - up to 02 October 2007 |
Archive 3 - up to 12 January 2008 |
Archive 4 - up to 11 December 2008 |
Archive 5 - up to 06 April 2010 |
Archive 6 - up to 13 January 2012 |
Archive 8 - up to 17 September 2014 |
Hello, my name is Craig Kief. I would desperately like to post an article about GENSO. GENSO stands for the the Global Educational Network for Satellite Operations. It is a joint program between the European Space Agency and universities around the world. We provide free training on this system to universities as part of a program with NASA and the Air Force Research Laboratory. I tried to start a new page but you deleted it because of a lack of references. It thought I was supposed to add those after the page was created. Also, since I didn't know how to really monitor it, I didn't find out it was deleted. Can you please help me in any way to get this created so I can begin to populate it? Craig [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiefc ( talk • contribs) 15:54, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
When you say talk page, I am assuming this means the link at the top next to my name that says My talk. I can communicate there as well. Craig — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiefc ( talk • contribs) 15:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC) User:Kiefc/Global Educational Network for Satellite Operations
Hi again, greetings. I think Gilbert and George should be renamed Gilbert & George, but I can't do it myself. Could you oblige, please? Thanks - Rothorpe ( talk) 16:38, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Saint David's School (New York City), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cross-country ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Category:Quill Award winners, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker ( talk) 14:47, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Dear TerriersFan,
My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.
So a few things about the interviews:
Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at [email protected] (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name
HERE instead.
If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at [email protected]. I will be more than happy to speak with you.
Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Obar -- Jaobar ( talk) 07:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Young June Sah -- Yjune.sah ( talk) 21:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oakfield (Hitchin) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oakfield (Hitchin) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Derek Andrews ( talk) 00:19, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
I see that you have removed my PROD on Highbury (Hitchin) on the basis that inhabited settlements are kept. Can you provide a link to this policy please? Perhaps more importantly I would question, as you did in the AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oakfield (Hitchin) our definition of settlement. While Highbury is part of a settlement, it is no more than a street with a few cul-de-sacs branching off. It appears to have no formal definition, unlike a ward, or parish. So do we create articles for all the other non-notable streets in Hitchin? Or even all the housing estates? Derek Andrews ( talk) 19:21, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
If think you used the wrong template for User talk:Kengi1982. He's not an IP user ;) Eeekster ( talk) 02:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Can you please let me know on what basis this AIV report was "declined". I had taken the time to reply to comments that were left. Chrisieboy ( talk) 22:11, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
My name is Gerald del Campo. I am the CEO of The Order of Thelemic Knights, which apparently had a page on Wikipedia that was taken down in 2011. I have just become aware of this.
On the deletion page some one noted that our non-profit, tax-exempt organization is a "blatant hoax" as if the organization didn't exist. As the CEO of this organization, which works along side of The Red Cross and *many* other charities, I take exception to this (as would the IRS) as it doesn't appear as though the editors who reviewed the page took much care in researching it. Furthermore, there are articles on Wikipedia itself that reference pages written by our members on our website. We also do a fair bit of publishing, which can be verified with a quick search on Amazon.com - we are listed as a non-profit organization by the Oregon Secretary of State, where our headquarters resides. Quite frankly, I am disappointed that an organization that does the sort of work we do would be so easily blown off by your editors with so little research. The subject matter "Thelema" is subject to great political bias and manipulation by some Wikipedia editors who are members of a supposed competing organization. If you allow that sort of manipulation to continue, Wikipedia will no longer be a source of unbiased factual information.
I am asking you to reconsider reversing the decision to delete, and perhaps spend a little time understanding the sort of work that we have done, and continue to do for the greater good in the name of our chosen spiritual paradigm. Please forgive, I am not familiar with the mechanics of writing there, and I simply don't have the time to learn a new language. Standard HTML would have been very cool since most people already know that. :)
The Oregon Secretary of State URL. Simply go to http://egov.sos.state.or.us/br/pkg_web_name_srch_inq.do_name_srch?p_name=ORDER%20OF%20THELEMIC%20KNIGHTS&p_regist_nbr=&p_srch=PHASE1&p_print=FALSE&p_entity_status=ACTINA
A copy of our trademark filing: http://it.zibb.com/trademark/order+of+thelemic+knights/29900971
Another: http://www.trademarkia.com/logo-76205557.html
Here is a link to a newspaper who mentions the work we did on behalf of a battered women's shelter. http://www.salem-news.com/articles/may122008/bradley-angle_5-12-08.php
You will see that we do in fact exist.
Here, we are mentioned for the work we do with battered women. http://altreligion.about.com/b/2011/01/03/how-important-is-a-prophet.htm
Our Church (The Thelemic Gnostic Church of Alexandria) is listed as a jurisdiction at the North American College of Gnostic Bishops. http://www.nacgb.org/member_jurisdictions.html
Guidestar.org http://www2.guidestar.org/organizations/93-1275678/order-thelemic-knights.aspx
Charity Blossom http://www.charityblossom.org/nonprofit/order-of-thelemic-knights-portland-or-97280-gerald-del-campo-931275678/
Manta http://www.manta.com/c/mrytqrx/the-order-of-thelemic-knights
All over the place, articles written by our members serve as sources for other articles. Here's an example at New World Encyclopedia: http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Fran%C3%A7ois_Rabelais
Thelema for Beginners web site: http://sites.google.com/site/thelemaforbeginners/home/12-thelemic-organizations
A podcast where I was interviewed about the Order of Thelemic Knights: http://www.podcastdirectory.com/podshows/350343
We are also registered with GoodSearch.com. http://www.goodsearch.com/nonprofit/order-of-thelemic-knights.aspx
And we are listed as a Thelemic Organization on Wikipedia here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thelema
Here we are at Amazon.com http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss/185-2501330-7856453?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=Order+of+Thelemic+Knights&x=0&y=0
This is archived permanently: http://hermetic.com/beastbay/984636406/
http://thelema.tribe.net/thread/f3109071-ef15-47a2-86a2-a2cfd59ca76c
http://egnu93.wordpress.com/bishops/united-states/tau-apollonius/
We are referenced on many books searchable at amazon.com
While it is the policy of the Red Cross NOT to post organizations they work with on their web site, we do have a pile of letters from organization thanking us for our assistance during emergencies like Hurricane Katrina, where we provided security services. Please contact me with any questions you might have. I could even arrange a phone call if you prefer.
Once again, thank you for your time and effort. If I have made any mistakes here, allow me to apologize in advance for them.
Sincerely, Gerald del Campo CEO Order of Thelemic Knights — Preceding unsigned comment added by Solis93 ( talk • contribs) 23:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your kind response and direction. It looks like I have a lot of reading to do. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Solis93 ( talk • contribs) 02:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
I reverted out your changes because you referenced a page which did not exist and you deleted my merge proposal without discussion, let's take this to the talk page. -- Salimfadhley ( talk) 16:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
About
this edit, I'd imagined that this is something we have in common and unspoken, eh?
Cheers~! --
Dave
♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 16:32, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, your edit in the page to report vandalism seems to have removed the IP that I reported. Did I do it wrong?-- Canoe1967 ( talk) 16:07, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I added some evidence to flesh out the AIV entry, to clarify why he should be blocked. Please check out Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism#User-reported one more time. Thanks in advance! Binksternet ( talk) 21:19, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
You're very fast! I was literally seconds behind you and I thought I was fast!! :p-- 5 albert square ( talk) 21:44, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, would you mind unprotecting Positive Futures Network so I can fix the double redirect? Thanks! Night Ranger ( talk) 19:34, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Would you mind taking a look here? I did a bad revert and apologized. Did not get a good response. Toddst1 ( talk) 22:42, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
I saw that you blocked the school IP that was adding the gay category to this article, but he appears to be back as 140.254.227.55 ( talk · contribs). I reverted him again, but thought I should let you know. Calabe 1992 23:58, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
For your attempts at User talk:Serbia100. No good deed goes unpunished. Drmies ( talk) 18:19, 18 April 2012 (UTC) |
Lol! Thanks; that's cheered me up!
TerriersFan (
talk) 20:01, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Invitation to diacritics guideline discussion at WT:BLP |
Hi, you were one of 100+ Users who has commented on a living person Requested Move featuring diacritics (e.g. the é in Beyoncé Knowles) in the last 30 days. Following closure of Talk:Stephane Huet RM, a tightening of BLP guidelines is proposed. Your contribution is invited to WT:BLP to discuss drafting a proposal for tightening BLP accuracy guidelines for names. In ictu oculi ( talk) 00:04, 20 April 2012 (UTC) |
Feel free to duplicate this invite on the pages of others who have commented, for or against. In ictu oculi ( talk) 00:08, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, you undid a change I made to the 3RRN posting, but your edit summary didn't include a reason. I made the change because the 4th revert lists me as a proven sockpuppet, but the admin making that statement originally ( User:NativeForeigner) altered his decision to note that I wasn't socking (see here, here and here). Thus, linking the 4th revert to an IP address with the note "(SPI #1 result"Definitely were socks")" is factually incorrect - I was not sockpuppeting, did not use an IP address to revert the page, and the admin who made that statement said several times that it was a mistake. I didn't strikethrough blindly, I included the relevant diff showing that the admin since changed their conclusion, and included a note to explain my edit - this was the most transparent way I could find to indicate that the 3RR report was based on a fundamentally incorrect assumption. I can't think of another way to indicate that the 4th revert (on both occassions) was not me and that the original conclusion was based on an admitted error, and without making such a change, the report itself is misleading, essentially wrong (as in, there were three reverts, and an edit war - but I did not make a fourth revert and I did not use an IP address as a sockpuppet). Bittergrey has had a chance to modify the report [1] [2] [3] [4] and has not taken it. I would like to replace my edit, or have the 3RR report in some way reflect that I wasn't sockpuppeting, if you believe there is a better way then I am happy to listen - but I would strongly prefer that the page not make the erroneous claim that I used a sockpuppet to game the system. Thanks, WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 14:03, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Since I've been mentioned by name here [5], I'll point out that my plan was and is to update the list once SPI #2 was done. Until then, we don't really know anything relevant. (No action was taken in response to SPI #1, so its only relevance is to set that stage for SPI #2.) Since Drmies has already written "I think we're done here", frequent updates seem pointless.
WLU, I was patient with you on my talk page for some time after you deleted my comment from your talk page with the justification "or I can just delete this without reading it". You can become welcome on my talkpage again by answering one simple question. Omitting these facts from your criticism of me here was fundamentally dishonest.
Now, since debates between WLU and myself only seem to end when I give him the last word (or write that I'm explicitly giving him the last word) I'll not comment further here. BitterGrey ( talk) 21:46, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi TerriersFan. I see that you posted a template for speedy deletion of my recent article TAXI - The Global Creative Network. I have added some further information to it - and please, be so kind and consider another aspect (as shown on the Talk page): there are a lot of other articles that use references to the website http://www.designtaxi.com as references. This means that DesignTAXI does have relevance by itself, thus I consider that the article deserves being kept. Best regards, -- Fadesga ( talk) 16:58, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks - a breath of fresh air - that does look much better. isfutile:P ( talk) 22:58, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For helping to fix up Woodleigh School, North Yorkshire. |
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Quick block on Piketoo! Thanks! Tomtomn00 ( talk • contributions) 18:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC) |
Many thanks; much appreciated! TerriersFan ( talk) 18:28, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
i see where you blocked User talk:Phobosrocks. however you might want to consider this diff [6] Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 18:54, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
You blocked User:Seyitahmetmrk as a vandalism only account, but as far as I can see not one of their edits are vandalism. Could you elucidate or the reasoning? I don't think that was a justified block at all. CMD ( talk) 19:15, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Well, it looks to me that we've worked around to a decent solution and we can move on. Thanks for your cooperation. TerriersFan ( talk) 11:14, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Conversation continued at User talk:Chipmunkdavis#User:Seyitahmetmrk. TerriersFan ( talk) 16:59, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
An article/redirect you protected has ended up in Double Redirects section.Since I'm not authorized to edit/fix this page and may end up breaking something, I request you to fix it or take any other necessary measures.
Sorry for the trouble and Thanks !
Hi--I recognize that I am in a potential conflict of interest situation. However, nothing I wrote is not included in the public record, easily accessed at the Department of Education's website. I can provide links for descriptions of the program and eligibility criteria.
I apologize for deleting the criticism. Please reinstate it, if you feel it is valid. Obviously, I don't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elizg ( talk • contribs) 18:34, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Good morning. Thank you for understanding about the factual errors. I will correct them (and nothing else). Liz — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.127.192.226 ( talk) 14:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC) It looks like the copy now reflects the changes. I look forward to the discussion of program criticisms. Many thanks, Liz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elizg ( talk • contribs) 15:55, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed this and wanted to be totally clear that editors are not under any obligation to discuss before redirecting a poor article to a more notable target. If you are going to effectively recreate articles, will you also take responsibility for making them conform to WP:V, WP:N and our other policies? -- John ( talk) 22:43, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Thanks for your contributions! SwisterTwister talk 23:06, 18 May 2012 (UTC) |
hi, would you mind if I use some words from your comment here at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psg public schools in my future comments at afd. you were precise and said exactly what was needed
--
Ðℬig
XЯaɣ 08:03, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thank you! TerriersFan for protecting and keeping Wikipedia free from trolling, disruption and vandalism. Keep up the good work :) TheGeneralUser ( talk) 20:50, 6 June 2012 (UTC) |
This isn't an account, it's an IPv6 address, so it shouldn't be indeffed.-- Jasper Deng (talk) 22:02, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, my article on Northampton Futsal Club was deleted by yourself and i'd like some clarification as to why and what I can do to get it back up to a standard acceptable to staying up please. You can reply privately to my talk as I suspect I will have many follow up questions. Thanks. DynamyteD ( talk) 20:29, 9 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DynamyteD ( talk • contribs) 20:17, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Thank you for blocking the user who made legal threats against me! Electriccatfish2 ( talk) 23:25, 10 June 2012 (UTC) |
it doesnt make any sense because norway will participate in the eurovision song contest that year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.59.120 ( talk) 21:45, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
I didn't know it would get deleted so quickly. I'm working with him currently to get his page up to date with his information and history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheDA204 ( talk • contribs) 22:16, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
User:TheDA204/Marty_Elias is this good to be published now? —Preceding undated comment added 20:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
I am uncertain of how Wikipedia works with regard to disputing information. I have noticed that a number of entries relevant to Rangers Football Club have been altered by mischievous supporters of other football clubs, particularly Celtic. I tried to reinstate some entries to their original truthful state but these were again "vandalised" and the edit tool blocked. Such amendments made by such people is childish in the extreme and belittles the usefulness of Wikipedia. I removed one recent entry which listed "Newco Rangers" as if it was a new club totally removed from Rangers FC. I have now apparently been "warned" by someone because I attempted to remove nonsense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JCDBigBear ( talk • contribs) 14:55, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is " Rangers FC club dead or not". Thank you. -- Andrewcrawford ( talk - contrib) 16:36, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You have contributed to the Newco Rangers article so I thought yuou should be made aware that an attempt is being made to undermine this article by pushing through a 'same club' approach despite many of us believing this is heavily biased and very selective use of the sources. You may wish to follow what is proposed at the Talk:Rangers F.C./sandbox2. Spiritofstgeorge ( talk) 12:46, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Rangers F.C.". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 16 August 2012.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee. 22:42, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning Rangers F.C., to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
AGK
[•] 20:16, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:World Chess Network (v 19.5, screenshot).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:40, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi there - I see you've added the Soccerbase link to the article on Sean Morrison. We actually have a template for Soccerbase links which should make it easier in future - see {{
soccerbase}}. Useage is simple - {{soccerbase|id=12345|name=John Smith}}
. If you need any help, let me know! Regards,
Giant
Snowman 16:33, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi TerriersFan. I've just come across a long standing edit war at Nude Records and upon looking into it noticed this post and others made by Dancingqueen100 ( talk · contribs) to AIV. Whilst I know that it wasn't vandalism being reported, I'm a bit baffled how you could have read that note and not thought to check the history of the article to see what was going on and then noticed that potentially libelous material was being added again and again. I'm sure this was just a mistake but I felt I have to let you know about it so that you can hopefully take action if you see something similar again. Thanks SmartSE ( talk) 00:34, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi, season's greetings! Fancy protecting the above? Rothorpe ( talk) 22:14, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for giving my article some fresh air though it is still suffocating under the stench of a deletion tag. But now I understand how much a deletion tag can grasp the attention of generous users and thus revive the article. Thanks anyway!!! bc-ndra ( talk) 02:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks!!! bc-ndra ( talk) 07:15, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that. I use User:Mr.Z-man/closeAFD but I've never seen that error before. Usually it handles redirected targets just fine. I'll mention that to him on IRC the next time. Mkdw talk 03:11, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello TerriersFan
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- 96.32.138.125 ( talk) 00:04, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution.
Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! File:Sampledutchg.jpg
Gedhun Choekyi NyimaDear TerriersFan, I noticed that you helped with the image of the missing girl Madeleine McCann. I had some difficulty in filling out all of the boxes to upload a non-free image of Gedhun Choekyi Nyima who is a young Tulku (almost to the level as H.H. The 14th Dalai Lama) he has been 'missing' since the age of six. Perhaps in your effort with Madeleine's image you offer advice or assistance in the smooth uploading process of my recently uploaded image of him? Many thanks. Fountain Posters ( talk) 00:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC) Javelin (band)Hey, I noticed that you deleted Javelin (band). I independently created a link to it on the Javelin disambiguation page, but I noticed that the page had already come and gone. You said you didn't see evidence of importance. The band's been around for 7 years, have played over 200 concerts [7], have released 4 albums [8], and have had reviews written about their albums [9] [drownedinsound.com/releases/15357/reviews/4139878] [10] [11]. So please undelete that page so I can see the history and improve it. Thanks. 76.126.140.195 ( talk) 21:35, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Bob_Carter_(voice_actor)&action=edit&redlink=1 People brought this to my attention as they were attempting to find more information about me since I've been nominated for several Anime Awards. Please restore your deletion and do more research (Google Search or IMDB Search or contact me personally if you have questions) next time if you have concerns regarding verification. Thanks for your assistance and consideration! Respectfully, Bob Carter — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cartergame ( talk • contribs) 11:14, 23 May 2013 (UTC) Glendale Academy protectionHi TerriersFan, I see that you indefinitely full protected Glendale Academy after some edit warring in January. Do you think that the full protection is still needed? Would you be willing to switch to semi-protection or unprotect? Mark Arsten ( talk) 19:19, 22 July 2013 (UTC) Category:Blue Ribbon schools in the United StatesCategory:Blue Ribbon schools in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor ( talk) 04:49, 23 September 2013 (UTC) Nomination of Demetri Goritsas for deletion![]() The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demetri Goritsas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gtwfan52 ( talk) 06:48, 24 October 2013 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Favorite betrayal criterionYou may be interested in Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2014_March_19#Favorite_betrayal_criterion, as you have commented in prior deletion discussions related to this article. Homunq ( ࿓) 02:06, 19 March 2014 (UTC) Notification of automated file description generationYour upload of File:Central Trains.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page. This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 14:12, 19 April 2014 (UTC) Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Request for commentHello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC) Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
|