![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Pinjra (2017 TV series) had context -- the title alone told a reader what it was about. What it lacked was content. I have therefore deleted it under A3 (no content). Please be careful with speedy tags in future -- admins depend on taggers to identify the issue that we need to check for. Also, please in future don't A1 or A3 so quickly. Please allow at least 15 minutes for the creator to add content or context, to avoid discouraging new editors. Thank you for patrolling. DES (talk) DESiegel Contribs 00:18, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I am Raj. yes by mistake i did remove content on Jaipur Page. Actually i am trying to create our Rawat Public School Page but again & again its redirect to Jaipur Page. Why??? Why happen like this. I was edit my page and after sometime i was checking then its redirect with Jaipur Page. Please let us know why again and again its redirect with Jaipur Page. Please help us. how to do it correct and why its redirect to other page. what problems in my page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharmaraj123 ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for noticing the new article I wrote, Trump: The Kremlin Candidate? !!!
What do you think of the article ? Sagecandor ( talk) 22:52, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We appreciate your enthusiasm but maintenance tasks are not for beginners. Please refrain from patrolling pages and tagging them for maintenance or deletion until you have significantly more experience. Now that you have just over 200 mainspace edits you qualify to enroll at the
WP:CVUA to learn all about vandalism and what to do about it. It's a much easier task and still extremely important. If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Happy editing!
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk) 08:15, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi.I'm just letting you know I have declined the PROD you placed on Capvision. Reason: Clear case of WP:A7 and WP:G11. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 08:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome Jumpytoo! I'd feel more welcomed were it not for... well... let's hope this all ends well, and you know what they say! Ayy... Georgeqgreg ( talk) 02:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
...and as a further aside, I'd just like to say... oops. I should've checked better, since I don't watch the CBeebies block much outside of Sarah & Duck. I'll try harder in the future! Georgeqgreg ( talk) 02:57, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jumpytoo. Please stop patrolling articles now – your patrolling does not appear to be in accordance with the instructions at
New Page Patrol. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk) 08:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for adding Alvin back to the Family Jr. page. I honestly did not know they were airing it. I mean, it really does sound like a terrible joke! The Chipmunks do not really belong on a preschool channel imo. (You know, I have long suspected Family's schedule people of using certain substances...) Georgeqgreg ( talk) 23:38, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello Jumpytoo. In my haste to block a persistent vandal/troll you recently reverted, I didn't notice that my screen had shifted before I clicked the block button on your name. I unblocked you as soon as I noticed, and I offer you my sincere apologies for sullying your block log. — DoRD ( talk) 00:27, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello Jumpytoo. You have wrongly deleted my link on Kavalan Distillery Page. This article provides an accurate and detailed information for readers on Kavalan distillery and whisky making processes. This is not a promotion article. Please review this article again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmorais ( talk • contribs) 00:14, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello Jumpytoo. You have wrongly deleted my link to Virginia Wine history. This is an in-depth article on Virginia wine history. Please review this article again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmorais ( talk • contribs) 00:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello Jumpytoo, Your answer is fair enough. This is a new website and not a blogspam. If you search with the keyword 'grapes and grains blog' it appears on the 3rd page of google and as 'grapes and grains' on the first page/search result on bing, besides it is also featured on other reputable blog portals. Going forward, I would keep the requirement in mind, that any site added as an external link, should have the criteria you mentioned. Thanks again for the clarification !! -- Rmorais ( talk) 01:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Your edit to the John Faso article has been reverted (see here for the reason). Please do not add text to Wikipedia which is OR or POV or designed to push a political narrative. Quis separabit? 01:29, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Rick and Morty (season 3). Hoaxes are eligible for speedy deletion under criterion G3. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia — and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morty C-137 ( talk • contribs) 02:57, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Jumpytoo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Jumpytoo, thanks for creating Imabashi Station!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn ( talk) 06:07, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Jumpytoo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Jumpytoo,
Thank you for creating KiHa 187.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Meatsgains( talk) 23:37, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
on that note, my changes weren't intended to stick, but were to discover the action potential of an apparently chaotic dispute process whereby we find insulting articles like the Hexagonal_Water article you rescued. perhaps you might glance at the article's Talk section and give a disposition where there clearly appear to be a number of objective submissions, a singular stubborn actor i mentioned, and apparently several potentially commercial TOS violators all in one happy place. the present article is as I say, an insult to the reader, grandstanding a very narrow opinion at the expense of some hard work clearly invested which includes peer reviewed links that are now presently quashed.
thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MetalllicHydrogenation ( talk • contribs) 06:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Hey, I'm new to Wikipedia editing, and the reason I joined it to increase its already amazing usability. On that note, I had added a few links to some pages, and I'd be grateful to know the reason for their removal as this will help me in my future edits. I made those additions as I thought it was adding value to the readers if they wanted to find out more on the given topics of the page. I had made sure to read the citing articles thoroughly to make sure they were relevant and not some marketing copies. There was some government links in there as well. It will be more than helpful if you point out why these links were wrong in my future edits.
Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uz100 ( talk • contribs) 09:19, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the response! This was really helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uz100 ( talk • contribs) 05:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for for your spot on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ayush0112, I did rather suspect that there was some sock-puppetry going on, but since the edit history was such a garbagefire I figured it'd be easier to tackle the article itself. Hopefully it can now be a stable medium quality article for a bit. -- Paul Carpenter ( talk) 09:29, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Dj phroze is notable alumni of Jacksonville High School, not for promotional use 2289409bk ( talk) 22:01, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Vermantia61 ( talk) 05:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Vermantia61
@ Vermantia61: Hi! The main reason I removed the link was because it triggered my browsers anti-XSS/malicious script detection. For obvious reasons, websites that could be malicious are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Hope that helps, feel free to reply back if you have any further questions. Jumpytoo Talk 06:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
I have provided a response to your request for the deletion of DGS Warehouse Illustration. If you are able to find a free version of this illustration (or photo) showing the entire building as it stood prior to its demolition, then I am very interested. I have searched for years and could not find one. This picture gives the reader an idea of what the building looked like and how big it was. The DGC Stores have not been in operations since the 1970s. I hope it will remain in place as it helps the reader get a sense of how influential the coop was in DC local history. Thank you. Blazing Liberty ( talk) 13:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Category:Circular line stations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shyamsunder ( talk) 10:37, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Can you help me create articles for these two newcomers?
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%96%80%E5%87%BA%E9%A7%85 https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%81%BF%E3%81%AA%E3%81%BF%E5%AF%84%E5%B1%85%E9%A7%85
Cards 84664 16:11, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
I came across this and that was exactly my point. The subject of the article is a billionaire and can easily influence journalism. The article has been created and recreated severally by undisclosed Paid editors, in fact the first time the article was deleted via AFD, it was blatant upe and the next iteration was G5 speedy deleted because it was created by a banned user. As individual editors we stand no chance against a billionaire who wants a Wikipedia article on himself no matter the cost, because he indeed does have the financial mean and influence to get whatever he wants but as a collective we can put an end to this sort of behavior. Celestina007 ( talk) 10:22, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Technical comment / request: the result was not speedy keep, but nomination withdrawn (a subset of speedy keeps, but this is a better wording - Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Procedure_for_non-administrator_close_(nominator_withdrawal) recommends using both in closing/edit summaries, as in "speedy keep (nomination withdrawn)"). Could you adjust the wording? TIA. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:36, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
I’m was wondering why you deleted the environment and community sections given that neither of them contain promotional content KnowledgeLover42 ( talk) 00:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in COVID-19. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
–– FormalDude talk 09:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
It is so frustrating that people ignore the actual policy that says that Olympians are notable only if they are medalists, and try to argue to keep articles on Olympians because there are so many of them. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Imabashi Station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Modern article with no effective sources. Fails WP:SIGCOV.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
scope_creep
Talk 23:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Matsushima-Nichōme Station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Modern article with no effective sources. Fails WP:SIGCOV.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
scope_creep
Talk 23:04, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Oki-Matsushima Station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
A modern article that is badly sources. No effective references. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Current single is 404.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
scope_creep
Talk 23:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi @ Jumpytoo: I happened to be looking at the articles you created. These are all modern articles created in the last year or two and every one from 7 to 12 don't have any effective sources. It is deeply uncool in this day and age to create on Wikipedia without proper references. The train stations seems to be created in 1911 which is ancient, so there should be plenty of coverage available. I will give you until the end of this weekend to see references on there, otherwise I plan to send them as a block to Afd. I review articles on as part of the work I do. The standard now is articles with multiple reference. It is not 2007 or even 2017. If these were new I would send them to Draft so they could be worked on. As they are too old, they will sent to Afd. scope_creep Talk 23:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
A page that I created was recently nominated for deletion and then the consensus reached to merge it with Crab Game. I wanted to know whether I am supposed to make this merger manually or it is up to other editors in the community to enforce this decision.
Moreover, I am still not very confident about this move considering I have never seen a work (game) have its creator as a section who has made other notable works.
Moreover could you guide me about guidelines of notability applied on Influencers considering Dani comes under Social media influencers. Are there separate guidelines for Influencer notability. If not then aren't the current notability guidelines ill-fitted for Social media influencers because in such spaces, people can have significant works and fame, be well known and still not get enough media coverage. >>> Extorc. talk 17:53, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, thought it was better to have this tangential discussion off the page. I'm under the impression that WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE only applies "Where the living subject of a biographical article has requested deletion" but it seems that I'm mistaken? Can you point me to where you get your understanding that WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE does not require a deletion request from the living subject? Horse Eye's Back ( talk) 15:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
On 10 July 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kazuki Takahashi, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 11:07, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
SocialPilot is Big Social Media Management Platform is used in multiple countries, its in top 5 https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/best-social-media-management-software/
and the reason of deletion is advertisement article but similarly some of his competitor page where also live
like Buffer (application) and Hootsuite so could you look in to this if could suggest me a better solution for this article i'll be geartfull Anil Dabhi 06:03, 5 April 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dabhianil8 ( talk • contribs)
Following your recent message I have updated again the name of our museum. This time I have left details in the edit page so hopefully the changes will not be reversed.
Thank you
Craven15 (
talk) 11:44, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)