Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Redalert2fan were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The page layout is broken and requires fixing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2019 Diamond DA62 Crash and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2019 Diamond DA62 Crash, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Redalert2fan ( talk) 11:11, 11 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jaden7667! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Redalert2fan ( talk) 11:11, 11 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello Jaden, and thank you for your recent edit to Tenerife Airport Disaster which I reverted. I notice you thanked me so I thought I should perhaps give you an explanation. In the infobox, the accident's Summary simply states "Runway collision" and there has been discussion about this in the past, with agreement that pilot error was just one of several factors involved in the fateful incident, including confused ATC instructions, misunderstandings in communication, even the heavy fog was a factor, so it's inaccurate (and unfair) to say categorically that it was due to pilot error. The Total injuries and Total survivors fields do not need to be qualified as 61 (all on Pan Am) because the infobox for multiple aircraft incidents is not designed to contain additional info in the top totals fields. The individual aircraft sections of the infobox below provide that info. Also, by saying "all on Pan Am", this could be misinterpreted to mean "there were 61 people on the Pan Am and they all survived" rather than "of all the people on board the Pan Am, 61 of them survived" – so it just adds unnecessary confusion. Reading further down the infobox, you can clearly see the Survivors field for the KLM is 0 and for the Pan Am is 61. Also, Robert Bragg is a redirect back to the Tenerife Airport Disaster article, so the link just creates a meaningless self-reference. Hope that helps. Regards, Rodney Baggins ( talk) 22:45, 15 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OxonAlex was:

There are two problems with this article:

Firstly, the article is unsourced, so viewers and other editors can't verify it is correct.

Secondly, the sources that exist are very likley to only cover his involvment in one event. Per our policy in Subjects notable only for one event, such people are generally deemed non notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malcolm Waters ( captain ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Malcolm Waters ( captain ), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ OxonAlex - talk 20:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS and Wikipedia:ONEEVENT for more information.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Cathay Pacific Flight 780. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I don't see enough independent notability for this person and the details are already covered by the flight article. Needs far more extensive coverage as with Chesley Sullenberger who has had a film made about his life as well as books.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malcolm Waters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Malcolm Waters, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:04, 2 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Bryce McCormick.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Bryce McCormick.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{ PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{ self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ^{( Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:46, 4 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Malcolm Waters, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:43, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Malcolm Waters, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 22:36, 2 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jaden7667. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " 2019 Diamond DA62 Crash".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 21:38, 4 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello Jaden7667! Your additions to Draft:Bryce McCormick have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 01:40, 6 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Apologies. Copy pasted this from a draft I made years ago so I must have rushed it? Should have done the due diligence. Jaden7667 ( talk) 03:47, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The article 2024 F-35 crash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Military plane crashes on routine flights are not generally considered notable. No deaths (pilot survived), no indication that this would cause changes in aircraft or procedures.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MKFI ( talk) 06:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The article 2024 F-35 crash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Military aircraft crashes are rarely notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rosbif73 ( talk) 14:18, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 F-35 crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 F-35 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rosbif73 ( talk) 14:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Jaden, I deleted the paragraph on the local churches being a 'high-control' group because it is unfair that an entire group of upt to 2 million can be maligned so publicly and powerfully on a Wikipedia page by including an entire paragraph that provides a link to criticism by a handful of people. In terms of proportionality, this paragraph and especially the link provides undue weight on criticism of the Local Churches, when seen in context with the rest of the article and in terms of the history of the local churches. There is no verified evidence of 'high-control'--only people's subjective viewpoints. On the contrary, professional theologians and Christian research institutions have done thorough research and have not found this kind of evidence. I don't see a problem with including the fact that people have criticized the local churches, but providing a direct link to the criticism of a very small group of people creates a problem of proportionality in the minds of the readers and will create disproportionally negative bias. 88.98.220.91 ( talk) 21:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC) reply