thank you for your information. I read the discussion on
Review of block and I would like to get unblocked. Thank you. --
Izadso (
talk) 20:40, 24 September 2011 (UTC) To check that I´m not a single purpose account you can check my contribs at de
[2] No blocks, no vandalism. thanks again. --
Izadso (
talk) 20:43, 24 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Various editors have chimed in during the AN discussion and the general opinion there is that you should both be blocked for disruptive editing. I'm willing to consider unblocking, though, but there are a couple of conditions you must agree to:
you disengage completely from making any edits regarding Michael Kühntopf, broadly construed and across all namespaces; just pretend he doesn't exist. His editing pattern has been duly noticed and, should he start again, he'll be blocked, so there is no need for you to keep an eye on him;
you disclose all of your sockpuppetts and accept that you will be restricted to only one account, this one;
you undertake not to adopt such an approach any longer: you will not edit war and will not follow an editor around, reverting all his edits — which is what we call
wikihounding —; if you should be caught in a dispute, in future, you will try to discuss with the other user and, if it doesn't work, try
WP:DR; if your interlocutor is editing
disruptively, just report him to the administrators —
WP:AIV,
WP:ANEW or
WP:ANI, as the case may be —.
If you accept these conditions, I'll be happy to unblock, warning you, however, that any violation will result in your indefinite block being reinstated. SalvioLet's talk about it! 09:08, 25 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Thats sounds fair to me. I accept all of your conditions. I have no sockpuppets and this is my only account. Thank you for unblocking me, if there will be problems in the future I will act as you asked me to. --
Izadso (
talk) 15:30, 26 September 2011 (UTC)reply
I'm glad! Since you accepted my conditions, I'm about to unblock you. Happy editing! SalvioLet's talk about it! 15:48, 26 September 2011 (UTC)reply
jewiki.net
Thought you may like to hear this site is now blacklisted.
Darkness Shines (
talk) 05:28, 11 April 2013 (UTC)reply
probably the best solution. Thanks for your work. --
Izadso (
talk) 22:28, 11 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Spam
Are you a sockpuppet of Michael Kühntopf who wants to spam wikipedia with links to his own mini-wiki, called jewiki?
188.104.207.128 (
talk) 10:07, 12 April 2013 (UTC)reply
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)reply