Please give me some facts about this dynasty — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.173.233.107 ( talk) 02:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Infinite0694, the information I removed from the Park Avenue article is not relevant to the article. You suggested I leave comments in the edit summary, which I had done. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I re-deleted the restored content. Thanks
Could youhelp me put in the proper references for the Fletcher Webster article? This is the one for his marriage: http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=MATownVital&h=19478887&indiv=try&o_vc=Record:OtherRecord&rhSource=6742 68.32.154.213 ( talk) 13:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello Infinite! I've just read your wiki-bio and I couldn't resist to ask you a favour. I'm an italian wikipedian and I'm looking for someone who can traslate me this text from english to japanese. It's really hard for us to find someone who knows both languages, so I decided to try and ask you. Don't worry, if you don't want to, there's no problem :-) -- Sakretsu ( talk) 20:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to point out that writing summaries of excessive length as you have done on List of Cross Ange episodes is not only wholly unnecessary, but no one would even bother to read such long summaries, especially your longest summary on the list to date, episode 20. I see that you also write summaries of suitable length as on Saekano: How to Raise a Boring Girlfriend for episode 7, so I can't understand why you're writing so much for Cross Ange. So please, it would be in everyone's interest (and would save you a whole bunch of time) if you kept your summaries to roughly the length of your Saekano episode 7 summary I linked above.-- 十 八 04:51, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
I just stumbled here but I've been keeping my eye on the Cross Ange episodes for awhile now and I have to agree with what Juhachi said. It's perfectly normal to get passionate about a series and write without restraint. Unfortunately on Wikipedia there can be too much of a good thing. Summaries are not meant to be detailed play-by-plays. In my opinion, only episodes 16 and above need to be reduced. If the 2-300 word count is little bit tough to gauge, try limiting yourself to at least 7-8 sentences per episode. Take care. —KirtZ Message 09:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
I thank you for your shortened edit but the current length of Recently My Sister is Unusual for the first episode is around 310 words, which is within the range. What I could use more help with are the larger ones. I want to shorten things up, but still make it clear what is going on at the backbone of the story. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 13:36, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
just keep watching and reverting that until they are bored, I'll watch some of the other ones that are easy targets for KC based vandalism Design A-125 ( talk) 06:11, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
While I understand that AssistIMU ( talk · contribs) probably has a conflict of interest regarding the IMU, I believe the edits that you reverted were probably legitimate. Badly formatted, but legitimate. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 12:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
I changed the deletion criterion on Kyaw Ye Paing. The article isn't gibberish, it's just written in Burmese, which likely didn't render properly on your browser (nor on mine). Fortunately, Google translate was able to make some sense of it, letting me know that the article is about a WP:MILL blogger (although, maybe in Burma, the mere fact of blogging can't be considered run-of-the-mill). In any case, the article makes no claim of notability, and has been so tagged. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 20:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I created the page and I want to delete it. I'm tired of personal attacks from those who do not know the entire story. I'm deleting my content. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Optiontrader11 ( talk • contribs) 18:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Just a note here, one, thank you for correcting that previous edit that removed my flavors offered edit. Two, I may be adding to that some, with more details as to when the various flavors were released, though at present I'm still trying to track down all the dates. Wanted to warn you that I often do not log in like I should, so if you see a random IP number adding particular dates of release and such, it's likely me. Edit: (you know...It would help if I signed the darned thing.) Kitsunedawn ( talk) 08:58, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Infinite0694. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:11, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hiya, can you restart or initate the second sockpuppet investigation on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/HoEuhophonium? I think when CRE ZE was added to the original like that, the admins will probably just ignore it and close it. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 23:53, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
For your work dealing with the massive troll raid on Sierra Vista High School (Spring Valley, Nevada) -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 07:40, 25 April 2015 (UTC) |
I've contacted Sergecross73 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) for his thoughts on the matter with HoEuhophonium. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 08:22, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi there! Just to let you know I have undone your change here. I think you may have been a bit hasty reverting this! See my change here ·addshore· talk to me! 12:51, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
You left Sonam K Sonam two warnings, so I thought you might want to comment at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Sonam_K_Sonam. Thanks! -- Ronz ( talk) 16:25, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Nice work getting Warner_Sun ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Versus001 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) blocked for socking.
I suspect that editor Titanium_Dragon ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Cyanidethistles ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) may be related to Warner Sun and Versus001 too.
Can you investigate? Thanks again. Cheers! {{u| Checkingfax}} { Talk } 20:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Could you please comment, specifically on whether or not there are ongoing Stability concerns, at Talk:Charlotte (anime)/GA1 ?
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt ( talk) 02:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia seems to think that you have considered my edit (81.152.228.121)to Kennet and Avon Canal to be unhelpful. I fail to understand why as it is a fact that can be verified and adds to the article? Please give me a good reason or I will go back and revert it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.228.121 ( talk) 13:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
I'm not fully following your CSD nominations. (E.g. User_talk:110.66.216.170) I don't speak Japanese, so the link doesn't help me. My guess is that LTA stands for long-term abuse. Are these talk pages associated with IP's who have been banned in the Japanese Wikipedia? If so, what is the policy basis for removal of the page on the English Wikipedia? Or perhaps I misunderstood the rationale for deletion.-- S Philbrick (Talk) 15:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Infinite0694,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award | |
Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 06:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC) |
Anti-vandalism strawberries. The Quixotic Potato ( talk) 04:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC) |
Infinite,
On the one hand, thanks very much for doing this. It's very helpful to us who are trying to keep small wikis running. (In my case, I'm an admin on Ladino Wikipedia.) Two questions and a point, if I may:
Thanks again. StevenJ81 ( talk) 15:52, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Hey Infinite, I've sent you an email again. This message is to confirm you my identity on Wikipedia or in case you don't use that address anymore. If so, just let me know :-) -- Sakretsu ( talk) 17:04, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Infinite0694. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Congratulations on your RFA! TranquilHope ( talk) 03:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC) |
Hello, Infinite0694. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Infinite0694. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)