I got reverted straight away know!! It's just wg spoofing.
Govvy (
talk) 21:14, 11 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Who's wg though... all I see is the random IP address making edits to the articles. I am not familiar with the wg here.
Iggy (
Swan) 21:17, 11 April 2019 (UTC)reply
No matter, don't worry about it, I know who is socking the article, I don't think the admins have the necessary tools to work it out know.
Govvy (
talk) 21:20, 11 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Can you please explain your removal of
this image as "not suitable for young readers"? What exactly is objectionable or unsuitable about this photo of a young woman performing on stage?
Praxidicae (
talk) 16:46, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
I would think that the image would not be good for some to view on Wikipedia. Some photos are better than others but the May 2019 photo seems like it came from a performance with an audience of a certain age and over.
Iggy (
Swan) 17:41, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
That doesn't really answer the question though...but I digress. It is a better photo but there is nothing objectionable about the one you removed other than it's possibly a copyright violation. And as I said, Wikipedia isn't censored even if it were an issue.
Praxidicae (
talk) 18:05, 20 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation link notification for June 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
Leah Williamson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Defender (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver). Such links are
usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions. Thanks,
DPL bot (
talk) 17:49, 27 June 2019 (UTC)reply