You reverted my edit regarding Oprah not being listed under the GOP list of potential candidates, citing a CNN/SSRS poll purportedly showing her reaching 1% support amongst likely GOP voters, which is "more than Ted Cruz, Mitt Romney, ..." etc. I looked up the poll and this is false. She was listed as "Oprah Winfrey, the Democrat" and it was not for a GOP primary, it was for a general election against Trump. Please cite your source next time.
Source: http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/01/23/rel1e.-.2020.pdf
You recently added polling info for declined candidates. Can you explain how this is helpful? Brian Everlasting ( talk) 14:58, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
You recently reverted one of my edits stating i misread the rules.
This is what the rules say:
===Candidates who have publicly expressed interest=== Candidates in this section have expressed an interest in running for President within the last six months. ***Candidates in this section only need one source ***Sources in this section can go back a maximum of six months ***Sources should be from after the 2016 Presidential Election ***Candidates in this section should not have expressed interest via social media
I read the rules correctly. Candidates who have publicly expressed interest only need one source. Crewcamel ( talk) 01:52, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
===Candidates who have publicly expressed interest=== Candidates in this section have expressed an interest in running for President within the last six months. ***Candidates in this section only need one source ***Sources in this section can go back a maximum of six months ***Sources should be from after the 2016 Presidential Election ***There should be one to three sources for a potential candidate ***Candidates in this section should not have expressed interest via social media
Hi IOnlyKnowFiveWords. If you haven't noticed, you have become an extended confirmed user, as you have made at least 500 edits, and your account is older than 30 days. This grants you to edit pages with extended confirmed protection. Happy Editing! Also congratulations on making 500 edits! Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{ re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 02:22, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
I have fixed the issue you raised here. I went to the template's talk page for help. Here is the response I got. Callmemirela 🍁 talk 21:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Hey, WP:1RR applies to the United States presidential election, 2020 article so please remember to not do more than one revert within 24 hours. Prcc27 ( talk) 04:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
I have reverted your edit to the David Petraeus page (Revision 807481460), but not without valid reasons. In the citation for his political party he is quoted as saying "I'm completely non-partisan."
Futhermore he is quoted in an interview in December 2016 saying that he doesn't vote at all. [1]
InitiatedCall ( talk) 16:44, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
References
Hello, IOnlyKnowFiveWords. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi IOnlyKnowFiveWords, I think the Kanye West endorsements made after his VMAs speech should be reinstated, because he said "I have decided in 2020 to run for president." ( [1]) So any individuals or organizations that endorsed him were endorsing him for 2020, why assume they changed their minds after the 2016 election if they already knew who the candidates would be in 2015. -- Theo ( contribs) 21:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
United States presidential election, 2020. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amortias ( T)( C) 21:37, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.No other gubernatorial election Wikipedia page as a biography under the parties so Florida will not be any different. Secondly you can’t only put one up you could of at least put up both at the same time. Thirdly you should not be using one source to label a candidate such as a moderate or a Washington insider those aren’t widely held labels and are disputed and shouldn’t be used. Zzannoni1956 ( talk) 20:13, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
About this edit, to say "I asked the Wells for President 2020 campaign and they confirmed that this Robert Wells is the same Robert Wells that I linked here" explicitly violates WP:No original research. Can you find a better source?— GoldRingChip 10:55, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
In response to your edit description regarding Roseanne Barr's home state, it seems you are correct in that the amended versions of her candidate FEC filings indicate an address in Georgia. Both the home address as well as the committee's address are located at a mail center in a shopping plaza. Her original filing from Jan 27, 2012 (when she declared her intent to seek the Green Party's nomination) indicates an address in California -- another mail center in El Segundo. Are home states as listed in the 2012 presidential election article based solely on address on the most recent FEC filing? For reference, the address listed on Gary Johnson's FEC filings in 2016 is in Salt Lake City, Utah, but on further inspection, every incidence on Wikipedia related to the topic lists Johnson's home state as New Mexico. GEORGIAN Go Dogs 04:06, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν) 02:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding categories to articles, especially biographies of living people, for which there is no claim or source in the article. It violates WP:BLP.-- TM 15:25, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Namiba. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on
Aung San Suu Kyi, but you didn't support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you!
TM 01:37, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
I've reverted you twice now. None of the provided sources call her "Natalie Wynn Parrott". Adding "Parrott" onto the end of her current name seems like it would count as WP:OR. Please make sure to read the edit history before re-doing an edit. Thanks. -- ChiveFungi ( talk) 02:29, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for the update on DSA Election results. You accidentally removed several PA and NY state victories, I’m on mobile now otherwise I’d re-add them. Shushugah ( talk) 08:48, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at David Dinkins shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. O3000 ( talk) 13:53, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
If big words confuse you, consider using a dictionary. Please re-read my comments at Talk:David Dinkins#DSA membership and do not edit war to restore the same nonsense again until you at least pretend that you intend to address my concerns. If you don't understand the words I used, please say so; I'll try to rewrite them so that even a person who only knows five words can understand. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 22:09, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, IOnlyKnowFiveWords. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Delaney ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
I kindly invited you to the discussion on Template talk:Infobox election#The Bolding issue to decide whether to bold the winner in the election infobox. Lmmnhn ( talk) 19:03, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
In July of last year, we discussed whether Lawrence Jackson, the former football player, is the same person who filed a declaration of candidacy for President. After 6 months, I still haven't found any real evidence that they are the same. The Twitter account which you said once referred to him as a "2020 presidential candidate" not only stopped being verified, it shut down altogether (see https://twitter.com/lojackson94). And there have been no posts to the blog since July 6, 2018 (the last one being about his then-upcoming wedding), and the blog doesn't mention anything about running for President anyway. I've removed Jackson from Third-party and independent candidates for the 2020 United States presidential election because I honestly think that it must have been a different person who filed the declaration of candidacy. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:36, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
Cabayi (
talk) 10:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
You have been reverted for adding albums that don't have articles to Template:King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard previously, so please stop and read what I've pointed out to you. Per WP:EXISTING, navigational templates are for existing articles. They don't serve as a discography for King Gizzard, or any other artist there is a template for. Write the article first, per WP:WTAF, then add the link. Thank you. Ss 112 00:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)