This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Please don't call this the "the stupidest quackery of all". You're just tempting fate for someone to conjure up an even stupider one. DMacks ( talk) 14:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
I have finished enough of Consciousness of guilt (legal) to go public with it. Further development and improvement will be appreciated. -- Valjean ( talk) ( PING me) 19:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Seeking a response on the proposal here. Thanks. AbsoluteWissen ( talk) 13:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Why did you revert my request for a citation to a statement that all theories on nonanthropogenic climate change are false? BBeagle ( talk) 16:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi Hob Gadling! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Félix An ( talk) 09:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several timesis true. It is very obviously not.
Hi, Hob. Thanks for your comment at Talk. I am away with spotty wifi and it’s hard to edit with only my phone, especially for formatted citations. Can you have a look at this and see if you can help out? Thanks. Mathglot ( talk) 09:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)