DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
This archive page covers approximately the dates between October of 2005 and some later date.
Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary.
Please add new archivals to User Talk:Habap/Archive03. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.) Thank you. -- Habap 20:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I notice that you have entered a discussion with Zephram Stark over at Talk:Inalienable rights. Just wanted to let you know that there is very little point in arguing with this person. Examine Talk:United States Declaration of Independence and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unalienable rights, and Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Zephram Stark. "Inalienable" and "Unalienable" are synomyms (as indicated in any dictionary), but this person refuses to believe it, and will not be deflected.-- JW1805 00:08, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
I have raised them at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Non-standard ordinal abbreviations. Your comments are welcome. Susvolans ⇔ 17:29, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
Yes, the Sheehan is long(-winded), and not very well written in some parts. But many of us worked hard over a period of many months to get the chronology exactly right, with the thought that future editors might eventually try to obscure what actually happened, as it happened, for example the visitors and when they came (some might say: "nobody supported her")... Your last edit read this way--with no end to the sentence. Anyway, the edit didn't save much space.
I've been clear--the chronology was documented, blow by blow, for posterity, a valuable thing, as I don't think anything quite like this exists elsewhere. Where the trimming might be more useful would be in the body of the article itself, with its excruciating detail of statements, counter-statements, etc. Badagnani 13:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
I'll not revert again either. If you feel that that information is beneficial in some way, put it back in. I was concerned because it's unsourced, uses lots of weasel words without making a lot of factual claims, and didn't generally seem to be making encyclopedic statements. But at most that's just one guy's opinion, nothing personal. ( ESkog)( Talk) 23:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
I marked it as a minor edit accidentally - I do a lot of recent-changes patrol so it's almost instinct when I revert... Thanks for being civil about all this. ( ESkog)( Talk) 23:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi there, I don't think I've run into you before, but I just wanted to say thanks for your civilized and helpful comments in Afd. All too often with deletion debates, emotions run high and useful discussion gets put in a corner and forgotten. It gives me hope that Afd can sometimes work when I see people actually thinking and considering arguments instead of just picking a side and rabidly defending it against all logic. Friday (talk) 14:50, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Sorry as wasn't able to vote as you wished. However I have annotated the AfD with my comments, based on the behaviour of the cabal (or the members involved). -- Simon Cursitor 13:37, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
-- Loopy e 04:49, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for showing me the edit count! I did not know that tool existed -- but I have only been editing about a year, 7 months under oldwindybear, and before that just on my ip address. What a neat tool! Thank you for taking the time to show me it. old windy bear 15:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
As requested: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Martorius -- Sort of just a take on the Military Unit box, but it serves it's purpose. Martorius 21:34, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
I would like to thank you for your support for my candidacy for the Military history WikiProject coordinator position. I am now the Lead Coordinator, and I intend to do my best to continue improving the project. If you ever have any questions or concerns regarding my actions, or simply new ideas for the project, be sure to let me know! — Kirill Lok s hin 00:05, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
I don't wanna overdo it or anything, so here's just a brief note thanking you for supporting me in the WikiProject Military history coordinator elections. Cheers, and I hope I can please as Assistant Coordinator! -- Loopy e 01:25, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Sorry I am late! Been away watching the Superbowl. I'm not good at thank-you messages, but still, thank you for supporting me, I'll do my best. :D If you ever need help, you know who to ask! -- Миборовский U| T| C| M| E| Chugoku Banzai! 03:48, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
HI. I am the coordinator of the Scouting WikiProject and Portal. I see you work on lots of Scouting topics and thought you may want to join us. See: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Scouting#Participants_and_primary_areas_of_interest and Portal:Scouting... Rlevse 17:12, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
This Barnstar is hereby awarded to user Habap for outstanding commitment and endurance in the quest to bring the Cindy Sheehan article, particularly the Chronology sections, up to an encyclopedic standard of quality. Thought 21:55, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
![]() Issue I - March 2006 | |
|
Welcome to the inaugural issue of the Military history WikiProject's newsletter! We hope that this new format will help members—especially those who may be unable to keep up with some of the rapid developments that tend to occur—find new groups and programs within the project that they may wish to participate in. Please consider this inital issue to be a prototype; as always, any comments and suggestions are quite welcome, and will help us improve the newsletter in the coming months. Kirill Lok s hin, Lead Coordinator |
|
delivered by Loopy e 04:58, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Before you revert, can you please explain the reason on the talk page. I am willing to discuss this issue, but it appears you are reverting me out of spite rather than any particular need or desire for Sollog's birthdate to appear in the article. Is there a reason why we should ignore the guidelines for conduct outlined at WP:BLP? Vivaldi 21:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Good work keeping racist material off the Squamish, British Columbia article. I think that the editor in question (along with User:207.81.122.3) is a sock of banned user User:HD_123321 (interestingly, he lists "Q Romenov" as one of his enemies). If the vandalism continues, it may be good to get an admin involved. -- TeaDrinker 23:25, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Habpap guess what putting camp summit violates the NPOV. You are a racist vandal youself.
-- 207.81.122.3 18:57, 14 April 2006 (UTC)=hABAP=
WHY ARE YOU ALWAYS ON MY CASE? STEPHEN HARPER AND SQUAMISH. I LIVE IN SQUAMISH AND BELIEVE IN STEPHEN HARPER. GET OUT OF SQUAMISH'S PAGE AND STEPHEN YOU YANKEE. HIS RELIGION DOES MATTER BECAUSE HE IS A RELIGIOUS PERSON.
- ED
No me name is not Edward it is EDwardo and I am not THE EDITOR I am da editor.
- ED
Well at least you are a soldier of christ, or at least your education came from a holy instution.
Just because I only said he was religious, that does not mean I do not know he is a member of the Christian and Missionary Alliance Church of Canada, he has routes in the united (note the uncapitalized "u") church. He attends East Gate Alliance in Ottowa. I am a member of the Conservative Party of Canada and a Christian I know what he is. There is a reason he says the very wonderful saying that he says: "GOD BLESS CANADA" and I would add "and no place elese" just kidding about the no place elese part.
- ED
I completly agree with you on the GOD bless thing. You do not seem as bad I thought you were, but you still seem a tad bit liberal. Camp summit by the way is nothing I drove by it today, guess what I saw? two dinky buildings and a portable beside the Easter Seal camp.
- ED
If you are getting this, it is because you do or did work on Scouting articles (see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Scouting#Participants_and_primary_areas_of_interest).
As the Scouting WikiProject has been formed since early January 2006, we've had many great improvements made in this area of Wiki and I want to personally thank everyone for their help. We don't always agree on things, but we keep moving forward. YIS, Rlevse 22:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
The April 2006 issue of the project newsletter is now out. You may read this issue or change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you by following the link. Thanks. Kirill Lok s h in 18:40, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
why did you remove the external link to Manhattan's book? Bharatveer 11:53, 9 May 2006 (UTC)