This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
current talk page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please
consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on
SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on
SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from
Nettrom (
talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. --
SuggestBot (
talk) 12:39, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Tah Dahhhh.....!
[1] AVN Hall of Fame... --
Scalhotrod - Just your
average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy...
(Talk) 21:53, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
I've been dreading the return of this character. It's all about making other people do work (that they don't want to do themselves) in order to push their own POV...ugh...
Guy1890 (
talk) 22:22, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Well, if the tendentious editing pattern returns, I'm (unfortunately) far more well versed with ANI now. Although, I have to admit that I am surprised by the effort put forth on the
Pornographic film actor article with the Autobiography section. But the wholesale removal of names from the Hall of Fame lists is IMO a blatant attempt at undermining the entire Porn Project scope of articles since its a PORN BIO factor that is relied upon so heavily. --
Scalhotrod - Just your
average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy...
(Talk) 22:34, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
He's being confronted by his actions by an administrator there...that's why the editing pattern changed. Squeak knows exactly what's he's up to here...it's obvious. Claiming
"BLP!" is not a shield for one's bad editing practices.
Guy1890 (
talk) 22:39, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Well, the best part about this is that he can do whatever he wants and after we fix it all, we can still take him to ANI and ask for a Indefinite Topic Ban. The more he does these weaselly maneuvers, the more evidence he stacks up against himself. --
Scalhotrod - Just your
average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy...
(Talk) 23:29, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
So where are we at with getting content and refs restored and the articles/lists back on track? --
Scalhotrod - Just your
average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy...
(Talk) ☮ღ☺ 02:52, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
That a great question...I've been keeping a list of mostly (ruined?) articles that were on or were recently added to my watchlist, which include:
I don't think there's much left to be done at
AVN Best New Starlet Award, since the award nominees aren't really covered under PORNBIO anymore, and I think we're looking pretty good at
List of members of the AVN Hall of Fame. There's probably lots more articles that "Squeak" has hacked away at in recent days, but you can find them by going through his
list of "contributions"...ugh...
Keep in mind that, at AN/I (a place that I loathe with a passion), less is more...walls of text get routinely overlooked by administrators. I think lots of people have well-documented the bad faith & disruptive behavior of a few editors in enough places at this late date. Thanx for your help.
Guy1890 (
talk) 03:07, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
And then of course
List_of_pornographic_actors_who_appeared_in_mainstream_films which is one click on "restore this version" away from being a great article. I should probably be hands off on that one and let someone make that revert/restore. --
Scalhotrod - Just your
average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy...
(Talk) ☮ღ☺ 06:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
...include random guttings with BLP quoted in the last year or so.
--
Scalhotrod - Just your
average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy...
(Talk) ☮ღ☺ 06:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Yea, there's a lot of work that's unfortunately been gutted over these last many months. In my mind, the awards-related articles and maybe the sub-genre article are the most important to be restored at some point soon. I realize the at least tangential importance of the adult performers that appeared in mainstream work article to PORNBIO, but there's waaay too much heat on that article at the moment. I can't engage in edit warring.
Guy1890 (
talk) 07:14, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing,
Chevauchée , has been proposed for a
merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going
here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.
ℜob C.aliasALAROB 19:38, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I only appeared to make a few minor edits to this article, so I'm not really familiar enough with the content to chime into this discussion intelligently at this time.
Guy1890 (
talk) 23:41, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleting True Information
Hi, I'm not trying to be mean, but I have seen that you have
undid my edit on
Thunderstorm. Now, I'm explaining this as clear I can, but that was true info. Everybody calls it a t-storm. Now, I'm going to re-add it on there and please don't reply saying "propose on talk page, please".
Thelogoontherun (
talk) 12:46, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Is it "true info" that some people call thunderstorms "T-storms"? Yes, but it's a nickname/slang term at best and not really needed in the article in question. There's no reason to
edit war over something so silly.
Guy1890 (
talk) 02:32, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Porn Project RfC
I have started an RfC on the Project Talk page and invite you to comment
here. Thank you, --
Scalhotrod - Just your
average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy...
(Talk) ☮ღ☺ 20:48, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
What's been going on here, unfortunately, is more gamesmanship (by some of the usual suspects, of course)...remove any mention of this material from a few articles because it isn't sourced, then remove the same, exact material again from even more articles after it's been successfully sourced. I personally think that it's a carry-over from
this CfD a while ago where the entire category that was related to the
Golden Age of Porn was deleted. Heaven forbid that a well-known adult performer from that time period of
adult films have a mention that they were actually from that time period in their Wikipedia articles...ugh...
As of a while ago, I have all of the names that were removed from this category stored somewhere safe (including pretty much all the ones that had this entry here removed from them recently). What I'm eventually going to do with them is another story. After this whole recent fiasco of blanking list content, it's probably not a good idea to start another pornography-related list. Maybe this book entry can be used somehow (as at least a Further Reading entry?) in the
Golden Age of Porn article...who knows...I don't like to play games with articles.
Guy1890 (
talk) 06:20, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please
consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on
SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on
SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from
Nettrom (
talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. --
SuggestBot (
talk) 12:47, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Really "Squeak", this kind of baloney is just going to attract even more attention to your well-established, recent pattern of
intentionally disruptive editing here on Wikipedia...please cut this kind of nonsense out. Continue to defy clear editor consensus on Wikipedia at your own risk.
Guy1890 (
talk) 23:11, 24 August 2014 (UTC)