|
|
|
Beware that three of your userboxes are unavailable. User oops was moved to my user page, but the other two ecology templates, I've no idea where they have gone. Hope this message is of use to you.-- Saoshyant talk / contribs (I don't like Wikipedophiles) 14:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
As Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Page_naming_conventions mentions, "The "(disambiguation)" should only be used when necessary", so there is no need to move dab pages if they don't have the "(disambiguation)". Just keep it in mind, and thanks for your work on dab pages :-) -- Commander Keane 04:44, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey Gryffindor! Months ago we talked about the end of WWI on the Alpine front. I just wrote this and thought you might be interested. Best, Tridentinus 16:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 23:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
You may wish to check the several genealogical trees mentioned at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greek pedigree of Empress Sisi. Maed 03:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
It has been suggested that the Sarah Croker-Poole article be merged into Princess Salima Aga Khan. As an editor of the article, you are invited to discuss. -- Aylahs (talk) 16:13, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Dear Gryffindor: Some time ago I have noticed (with pleasure) that you have used our book "Stadtbildverluste" for a certainm number of articles on Jewish Vienna. I am now myself busy at processing the information we have gathered on lost cultural treasures for the purposes of (German) Wikipedia. Unfortunately I am finding out that we know by far too little about certain things, e.g.: Who was the owner of Ledererschlössel (= Huldenbergschlössel) before 1938 ? Who was the owner of Sickenbergschlössel in Nussdorf (my friend Kupf gives the name of a certain Hugo Stern, but was it the laryngologist? Maybe we could get in touch and work together a bit on that subject (e.g. introducing a category: "Jewish property in Vienna - before 1938"). Best wishes
Robert Schediwy 84.112.54.160 09:53, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Dear Gryffindor,
Did you get my message? I am not really ready to register, I prefer to remain a bystander, but I am easy to find in the Viennese telephone directory, and I have an answering machine. Would be glad to hear from you.
Yours
Robert Schediwy 84.112.54.160 08:22, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
I've found out some things about August Lederer and his Schlössel in the context of Gustav Klimt. You may be pleased to notice these things in the German Wikipedia.
Robert Schediwy 83.191.126.42 06:04, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Gryffindor, I hope you reached some kind of agreement on the naming controversy. Apologies for disconnecting off the discussion. Have a nice Christmas! Asterion talk 14:15, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Gryffindor/Archive8. Over at WikiProject Harry Potter we're trying to compile a list of active participants. Your name, along with all other project participants, has been placed on the inactive list. If you'd like to get involved again, please place your name back on the active list, and take a look at the project talk page for the latest happenings. |
RHB(AWB) 21:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC), on behalf of WPHarry Potter
So I did some research and checked with some pretty credible sources as to what they print, in ENGLISH, for the name of this region (and province) in Italy.
As far as proof, I am quite sure that the above sources are credible enough, especially in the sense of geographical knowledge, expertise, and English-translation. Like it, or not. Rarelibra 03:47, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning, as well as for your kind comments accompanying your !vote. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 21:04, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
As you set out for
Ithaka, hope the voyage is long Don't expect Ithaka to make you rich. Ithaka gave you the
marvelous journey |
Du solltest vielleicht einen Blick auf die Diskussionsseite von Elizabeth werfen. Man sieht da Probleme. WolfgangRieger 22:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, do you have a citation for the material on Muslim World League: According to the German newspaper Die Zeit, the MWL tries to propagate Wahabism with huge financial backing. OR The World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY) and the International Cultural Foundation of Geneva (established in 1978) are arms of the Rabita. SmithBlue 09:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 07:00, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello Gryffindor;
The naming of Russian grand duchesses is a situation with many issues to be sorted out. A conversation was started at the talk page for the naming conventions of royalty and may be of interest to you. It is certainly worth reviving. It kind of trailed off into the spellings of patronymics but it certainly can be moved back into the direction of naming formats. I am unsure as to what the article should be named. Grand Duchess Alexandra Georgievna (Alexandra of Greece) might be a possibility. Charles 19:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
I can't understand why maintaning a wrong title to this article: the official name of the province is Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano (in English: Autonomous Province of Bolzano). See Italian Constutution, art. 116. I come from Veneto, Italy, near Trentino-Alto Adige: believe me if I say these things to you. -- Checco 10:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Ok, let's try to be logical. Here we have a province that in Italian is named Provincia autonoma di Bolzano (or Provincia autonoma di Bolzano - Alto Adige/Südtirol) and a region named Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol, as it is written in the Constitution. Why do you disagree with me? -- Checco 13:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 23:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Hideki_Tojo&diff=107858088&oldid=107715395
Your macron fix violated the Wikipedia Manual of Style for Japan related articles. For people we use the "best known romanization" - in this case, it's Hideki Tojo. WhisperToMe 06:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello Gryffindor;
How are you? I have started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Dauphins and would appreciate your input on the matter. Many thanks. Charles 00:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi!
Could you please use Flag of Austria (state).svg in your signature instead of the PNG file? Thank you! -- ALE! 11:34, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Gryffindor, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!
I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?
Your username appears to be a unique trademarked name (trademarked by J. K. Rowling), and also could offend muggles, fans of Slytherin, and people who don't like Gryffindor or Harry Potter.
I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.
You have several options freely available to you:
Let me reassure you that my writing here means I don't think your username is grossly, blatantly, or obviously inappropriate; such names get reported straight to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism ( WP:AIV), or blocked on sight. This is more a case where opinions might differ, and it would be good to reach some consensus — either here or at WP:RFC/NAME. So I look forward to a friendly discussion, and to enjoying your continued participation on Wikipedia. Thank you again! -- — Jeff G. 23:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Although the admin rollback tool is extremely useful and quick, it is imperative that you do not use this tool and instead provide an edit summary anytime you revert things that are not obvious vandalism, even if you think you have explained yourself well before. This and this are unacceptable. — METS501 ( talk) 01:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Gryffindor;
I have started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (names and titles)#French princes revisited. Would you care to comment? Thanks. Charles 10:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 00:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Dear Gryffindor,
could you please move
I think there is practically consensus on place names of
South Tyrol, see
Talk:Bolzano#Please_move_back, the only one opposing it being ex-Taalo. Thank you in advance. --
PhJ 14:04, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I've just noticed that there is already a straw poll, and I agree with your opinion. Best regards and happy Easter,
PhJ 17:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 21:16, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
From the history of this page it is obvious that the title of this article is contentious. Therefore your recent rename of Henrietta Anne Stuart to Henrietta Anne, Duchess of Orléans without trying to find a concensus first is improper. I had opened a discussion on this subject on the Talk page, and the proper thing to do is state your opinion there and give others a chance to respond before actually moving it. JdH 04:38, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi Gryffindor;
I have posted my first thoughts on the matter. Also, could you look at Prince Alexander of Hohenzollern and Prince Alexander of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen? They redirect to each other! I moved the latter back to the former (Sigmaringen was dropped) and it appears that Stijn Calle has been messing things up again. Charles 20:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Royal dukes, to me, are in a category all of their own. It is one thing to give ordinals to the titles of non-royal nobles, but to me, in history, royal dukes are notable enough in their own right that the enumeration is not necessary. In fact, it is something that I do not desire. I don't think it is necessary to add "Orléans" at this time. At the very least, there is a discussion at WT:NC(NT) that ought to be revived on the matter. Charles 19:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
On your day, I wish for you I wish you fine and simple pleasures. Happy birthday, dear Gryffindor! Love, |
You're most welcome, sweetie :) Mine is July 29, so I still have a couple of months before I worry about my next step towards the
dreaded moment ;) It's great to see you again btw! Love,
Phaedriel - 16:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello. There is a discussion about listing administrators on the Film project. If you agree or disagree, or just want to add your two cents, please comment here. Thank you. — Viriditas | Talk 23:59, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
It seems that when Elizabeth of Bohemia was moved to Elizabeth Stuart, the talk page was left behind at Talk:Elizabeth of Bohemia, and the new talk page left as a redirect to Talk:Elizabeth Stuart (disambiguation). I have cleared the latter, but cannot do the move. Could you, please ? -- Beardo 12:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey Gryff - haven't talked to you in a while... I've been busy with work, school, and military training. I am having a difficult time explaining to User:Supparluca that the names listed on the Provinces of Italy website are not the capital city names for the provinces, they are the province names themselves. He is insistent upon continuing to change the name(s), and offering the explanation that they are capital city names. Can you help me educate him? Thanks! Rarelibra 17:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
There's a vote, there's a majority. I'd say we should go ahead, and if anyone wants to object they'll have to get another vote. Much like Meran, a move you know I wholly support :D. Best, Tridentinus 17:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 21:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
You should not have moved on the basis of a poll in which you !voted, even if this were consensus, which I deny. Province of Trento is even worse; 5-4 is not WP:CONSENSUS; even if this were a vote. Would you be interested in Mediation? Septentrionalis PMAnderson 15:21, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes, we had a poll in both cases. In both cases, they came out 5-4. Stremonitis closed one of them, correctly, as no consensus/do not move; the other should have been closed the same way - and both should have been left where they were. In any event, you, as a strong advocate on one side, should not have closed them, or done any move at all, even if consensus appeared; some one else (presumably Stremonitis) would have. Please move Trentino back to Province of Trento, and we'll say no more about it. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:03, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
I didn't move Meran to Merano: it was an administrator. Please do not post on my talk page anymore.-- Supparluca 17:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
I'd strongly advise you should definitely refrain from taking any further admin action on this article yourself, for the time being. In any case, looking closer into this, it turns out that you have even move-warred up to 3RR over this! I hadn't noticed that earlier. One move on 31 May, and then three revert-moves in quick sequence on 3 June, reverting three different other editors. And then protecting your version. That's pretty bad.
Just for documentation:
I'm going to revert this move again now and I have to notify you that I'm prepared to enforce 3RR against you if necessary. But I trust you will let this rest now. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:42, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Gryffindor;
How are you? I have posted on the admins' noticeboard twice about the same situation and have not received any comment. Would you mind taking a look at it? Thanks! Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive814#Harassment by Tfoxworth. Charles 18:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm having a problem with a user who keeps enlarging the map to a size that is too large and overbearing for the page, especially with lower resolution screens. The user is insulting and verbally abusive with me, and continues to revert the page back to have a huge map. Can you help? Rarelibra 14:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Some of his insults and personal attacks, which can be found in the history of my talk page as well as on the talk page of the Governorates of Egypt page, include the following quotes:
Lanternix - do you think you can be allowed to post the above without looking at your own actions? Here you go:
Rarelibra 16:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
That information was already there, if you read carefully, and I readded it with my revert. In your edit there were also some wikilinks to redirect pages, like Trentino, so, basically, I considered it a disruptive edit.-- Supparluca 17:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:European Presidency Austria 2006.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 13:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:KPÖ logo small.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello Gryffindor/Archive8, you are member of the project European Union. I try to create a new project page for the project. You can see it at here Because this should be the project page for all it´s members, please tell me, what you think about it. Please leave your comments on the talkpage of the project.-- Thw1309 11:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Nehrams2020 08:10, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
I have tagged Image:SGP_logo.png as {{ no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 05:48, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
I have tagged Image:SGP_altes_Logo.jpg as {{ no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 05:50, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
I have tagged Image:SGP_altes_Logo2.jpg as {{ no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 05:50, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Long time since we've chatted. I need your help on the Provinces of Italy page - they are trying to insert a link to a redirect (South Tyrol war again). They cannot accept that the officially translated name is "Province of Bozen-South Tyrol" (as per the provincial website). Rarelibra 13:31, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 18:40, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Now that South Tyrol has been moved to Province of Bolzano-Bozen, if you care, please add your opinion on the future of South Tyrol here: Talk:Province_of_Bolzano-Bozen#Whither_South_Tyrol.3F. — AjaxSmack 00:56, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Yes I know... the same old, boring conflict Italian vs German name, but I think in this case i have the Naming Conventions on my side. Maybe you're interested, Mai-Sachme 16:01, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Raiffeisen logo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi Gryffindor, I stopped contributing to South Tyrol-related move discussions because I'm increasingly frustrated by all the nonsense and so-called NPOV arguments used in them. It feels like an enormous waste of time, and I decided that I have better things to do. I still support the outcome of the "communes of South Tyrol" discussion, BTW. Markussep Talk 13:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi Gryffindor, somebody has brought up an ANI thread about you at WP:ANI#Unilateral move. It currently appears you did some rather questionable things there: First, you used your admin privilege in moving a page over a redirect with a history, when you knew that move was unilateral and would be controversial. Then, you continued move-warring, plus, you employed the dirty trick of "scorching" the resulting redirect so as to make it impossible for the other side to move back ( [3], [4])
I remember I once warned you before to not use your admin privileges in conflicts to which you are a party. Now you did it again, but partly avoided formally using your admin bit (by using the redirect-scorching trick instead). I'm not sure which is worse. I generally consider redirect-scorching a blockable act of disruption in itself. There's an Arbcom precedent about it somewhere too. I must strongly warn you:
I'm going to revert that page to the status quo ante (whichever that was, I haven't checked), and I expect that it will stay there until some consensus to the contrary has been reached. Thank you, -- Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:42, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
The
August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by
BrownBot 03:56, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Gryffindor, sorry for my late response, but I was busy in the last week. To keep it short: I'm not interested in long discussions, I think everything has been said and I'm kind of disgusted with the behaviour of some disputants. But if there should be a new poll, I'd vote for South Tyrol. Mai-Sachme 17:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Under the header "Court of the Sultan's Consorts and the Concubines" you added the sentence : "It was constructed which underwent restoration after the 1665 fire is the smallest courtyard of the Harem." This makes no sense to me. Can you look at it again ? Cheers. JoJan 08:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for my late answer (I was in Switzerland..) I'm absolutely for the usage of the name "South Tyrol" because it's the only correct English name this region could have.. Why did you send me the special version for Italian nationals? Hehehe. Bye. User:Skafa/Sign 23:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Hist_sitzungssaal.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 16:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
An automatic notification by BrownBot 23:21, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
In 2005, you added an image of Juntoku-tennō's tomb.
In February 2007, another editor added an image from the Hyakunin Isshu to this Japanese emperor's page. ...link to web page showing multiple images of Japanese emperors and empresses (in Japanese)
Jefu has now removed that art. I am certain that I would like to undo his deletion edit, but I suspect that this potentially provocative action would need to be well-informed. Jefu is a lawyer in the Tokyo office of a major American multi-national law firm. My experience with this editor in the past leads me to believe that has the inclination and skills to enjoy Wikipedia disputes. I don't. Without more, any argument in support of restoring the Juntoku image can be dismissed as naught but a personal preference. Do you see my point? Do you perhaps know anything which may be relevant here?
In my view, the art image was not meaningless -- rather, I thought that this image (and its counterparts from the same source) are appropriate, valuable supplements to the text.
This trivial issue becomes somewhat urgent because it is reasonable to anticipate that Jefu will probably make similar edits to articles about a number of other Japanese emperors. Perhaps this might become a problem in the making ...?
Do you have any constructive suggestions to offer?
The following from the page history may refresh your memory of what you yourself did:
Revision as of 12:23, 30 September 2005 (edit) (undo) Gryffindor (Talk | contribs) (add image)
Newer edit → Line 13: +
As for that specific photograph of the Juntoku tomb, I have a curious question.
As it happens, a National Geographic guidebook for tourists says clearly that Juntoku is buried on Sado island.
Is it possible that there is a mistake in the caption?
Or could this be his an "official" tomb in Kyoto, as contrasted with the actual location of the former emperor's interment? -- Ooperhoofd 18:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 23:07, 1 October 2007 (UTC)