![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Jeffrey Epstein on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your review. I'm hoping you might answer a few questions for me? Your comment has made me wonder whether I submitted my updated draft correctly. What you are describing sounds like the very first version of the article that I submitted, prior to extensive edits. Could you possibly tell me: did the version you reviewed have under "Career" the subheading "Surfing" or did it have two subheadings "Co-founder of Pro Surfing" followed by "Pro Surfing Competitor"? The latter is the newer version. The new version should also have 66 endnotes (whereas the older one had fewer). Is that what you saw as well? I appreciate your taking the time to read the article and look forward to hearing from you.
Mary Evelyn ( talk) 23:49, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Thank you again for your helpful reply. I will definitely work to make the additional changes you've suggested. But first, I did notice that your edits were in fact to the older (incorrect) draft. For example, I noticed that under the "Career" subheading in the version you edited, it included only a "Surfing" heading, but my latest revision divides the surfing career into two categories: "Co-Founder of Pro Surfing" and "Pro Surfing Competitor." Here is a link to the correct draft, which should have 66 footnotes: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:Patti_Paniccia&oldid=1046491774 Forgive me - I ask only to make sure that I have submitted the correct draft. If I have not, I will have to learn how to do that. Sincerest thanks. Here is a link to the current one. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:Patti_Paniccia&oldid=1046491774 Could I please ask you again, is this the link you initially worked from? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mary Evelyn ( talk • contribs) 18:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your guidance with regard to my article on Patti Paniccia. I have made what I hope are all the kinds of changes you advised. I've added a reference for every fact, and omitted any fact that did not have a reliable source, and taken out anything that I thought was promotional in nature. Would it be appropriate for me ask if you might take an informal look at my latest draft to give me any further input before I submit it for review? If so, I would greatly appreciate it. The draft is at 00:56, 13 January 2022, and at https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:Patti_Paniccia&oldid=1065331498 Thank you again. Mary Evelyn ( talk) 01:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)Mary Evelyn
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
In my 9 years experience of Wikipedia editing, I have realized that you are one of the most thorough and effective editors on Wikipedia! My Best Regards Ngrewal1 ( talk) 19:42, 15 January 2022 (UTC) |
Hello, Goldsztajn
Thank you for creating Malahat Ibrahimgizi.
User:Goldsztajn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Link does not establish that Ibrahimgizi is a member of the Majlis, however, I found the correct link.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Goldsztajn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Goldsztajn ( talk) 08:09, 23 January 2022 (UTC)