Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Armeniac Theme. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. The information comes from a credible source. It may be possible that there is a mistake, but your own personal experience, as one user among millions who use this site, is not admissible per
WP:OR and
WP:RS. Regards.
Constantine
✍ 20:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
As the main author of Late Roman army, and of the army organisation charts in it, I am fed up with your repeated unilateral removal of the East Roman chart, simply because you think it's wrong. You are totally in breach of Wikipedia etiquette, which requires that before making changes, especially to an A-rated article, you should first propose those changes on the discussion page, with supporting ecidence, and give the main author, and others, the chance to comment. As it is, you have not provided a shred of hard evidence to support your contention that eastern duces did not report to magistri. If you do so on the discussion page, I shall be happy to debate the point with you. in the meantime, I suggest you stop your arragant behaviour. EraNavigator ( talk) 13:09, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent contributions to Wikipedia. While the Wikipedia community appreciates your efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, we cannot accept sources that appear to be the original work of the editor. If the material you added can be attributed to a reliable source, you may add it back if you cite it. This increases the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole and aids in the verifiability of the article. ~Pyb ( talk) 09:49, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Please, in future don't perform cut-and-paste moves. Go through regular channels, per WP:RM, instead. Otherwise the page history is lost. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 18:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)