Just thought I'd let you know that User:UninvitedCompany has nominated you at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Frecklefoot. Andre ( talk) 19:45, Nov 11, 2004 (UTC)
I've "started" the Free the Rambot Articles Project which aims to get users to release all of their contributions to the U.S. state, county, and city articles (if any) under the CC-by-sa 1.0 and 2.0 license (at minimum) or into the public domain if they prefer. A secondary, but equally important, goal is to get those users to release ALL of their edits for ALL articles. I've personally chosen to multi-license all of the rambot and Ram-Man contributions under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License so that other projects, such as WikiTravel, can use our articles. I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all your contributions (or at minimum those on the geographic articles) so that we can keep most of the articles available under the multi-license. Many users use the {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} template (or even {{MultiLicensePD}} for public domain) on their user page, but there are other templates for other options at Template messages/User namespace. If you only prefer using the GFDL, I understand, but I thought I'd at least ask, just in case, since the number of your edits is in the top 100. If you do want to do it, simply just copy and paste one of the above two templates into your user page and it will allow us to track those users who have done it. For example:
OR
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain (which many people do or don't like to do, see Wikipedia:Multi-licensing), you could replace {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} with {{MultiLicensePD}} -- Ram-Man 00:19, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)
Hey Frecklefoot, since you seem to be a veteran here I'd value your input over here: Talk:A_Planet_Called_Treason -- SDG 07:18, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Marcus Stewart is in fact a well-known footballer. You listed him for speedy deletion for "vanity". The latter is not of course a criterion for speedy deletion. I have removed the tag. If you truly believe that this article should be deleted, please list it on VfD, where it will inevitably fail to reach a consensus. Dr Zen 23:46, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Thanks, I really like it too. I actually captured it along with a few others from that trailer back in May 2002 (when the trailer was brand new), with no intent of keeping it for Wikipedia but to show for a few people who didn't have bandwidth to download the trailer. I rediscovered it while browsing an image directory on an old website of mine... - Fredrik | talk 08:55, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
What is the difference between a stake and a ward? Thanks Edwin 21:32, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for the clarification. I appreciate it! Edwin 23:02, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
This is kind of old, but I just saw you accused me of spamming the video game article. I think it's great that you're weeding out spammers on wikipedia, but I don't think it's really fair in this situation, because they do provide free statistics. Anyway, it doesn't really matter, I just had to get that off my back because I don't like being called a spammer :) Jacoplane 13:36, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Nice to see you back at the Mormonism articles. I hope the climate is clement and you find yourself contributing there a lot again. Tom - Talk 03:55, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)
Can you please support the rename and requested move to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter=day Saints Wikipedia:Requested moves#Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of_Latter-day_Saints_.26rarr.3B_The_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of_Latter-day_Saints Thx in Adv -- Trodel 06:33, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
I noticed you asked a question (perhaps just rhetoric?) in one of your edits to Sims 2 University about the need for system requirements. I believe it is a useful fact that users would appreciate being included. Its true that Maxis' main site for the game does have the system requirements, but I believe its important enough to include right on the article (The Sims 2 article does this as well). Hopefully it'll look better when there's more to the article :). bernlin2000 ∞ 19:14, Jan 10, 2005 (UTC)
Yes, it came out beautifully. Care to take a peek? User:Alisonsage. A good sense of humor is definitely in order... allie 23:19, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Too late! The chronology is now underway on User:Alisonsage/Campbell Chronology. It's pretty much the same thing that's currently on the Campbell's page, just listed in chronological order. The formatting is a bunched up, I know. Franco-American deserves its own paragraph in the article, I think, because it morphed from a maker of gourmet soup into Spaghetti-O's 50 years later! Haven't finished it yet. For example: didn't included their sales figures. They're like McDonald's. My only problem is my source: America's Favorite Food: A History of Campbell Soup Company was WRITTEN by Campbell's. So the entire article's perspective is POV, without another reference citation. -- allie 14:26, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
I nominated him for Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week please show your support :) ALKIVAR ™ 23:53, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Well the first thought is not going to work LOL :) If you want to add it, go ahead, he'll notice and revert it. America's Army was recently added to RfC (not by myself), so I think we should just let that play out, although admittingly I don't know how that all works. I contacted Andre due in most part to him being involved with Mediation and thought he could offer some sort of advice for this situation. We'll see where this goes. K1Bond007 17:12, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)
Okay, I did it. You can find it here (the main page is listed here). Afraid I didn't do a very good job. Didn't have much time and some of the sections of the "form" seem duplicated. Please expand/improve. — Frecklefoot | Talk 21:19, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)
It said that I'm not supposed to sign it anywhere else if I'm the one who wrote the "Summary" part. I signed my name there, but didn't think I was allowed to sign it elsewhere. Correct me if I'm wrong. :-) — Frecklefoot | Talk 16:05, Jan 28, 2005 (UTC)
Well nothing to be sorry about. I'm just tired of discussing it and arguing about it. When we started the RFC I thought we'd get a lot more comments from users and not just from a guy who's been registered with Wikipedia for only a week or two. I also quit because it appears the RFC was going no where. No one wanted to discuss the matter at all. It kept getting routed to whether video games are a notable subject for Wikipedia and about the arguement over whether the game is propaganda (which while being contested often on that article, wasn't the subject of the RFC). It really says something about Wikipedia when a complaint isn't properly heard and discussed. I obviously really like Wikipedia, but twice now I've been disgusted with it over this one article. Perhaps I'll try again in a month or two. K1Bond007 17:34, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)
I noticed that you added what "Type" of company Firaxis is in the fact box. I think that "Type" refers to whether is is a Public or Private company. That's the way it is in the Microsoft factbox. -- Munchkinguy 18:36, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Howdy, I noticed you cleaned up the "Gamer Subculture" articles. There is one particular thing in your revision that seems odd though -- "With the exception of the Gamecube, today's consoles have moved from CDs to DVDs to contain more game content."
This is partly false, as the Gamecube does in fact use DVD (And only DVD) format media. The only difference is that it's size is smaller then standard sized DVDs used by Microsoft and Sony. I'll let you decide if you want to change that or not. -- 140.211.122.171
I'm giving you this message because you have been active on Gaming Collaboration of the week in the past. The collaboration had a bit of a hiatus, but it's now active again. A new article will be chosen this Sunday. It would be greatly appreciated if you visited the page to vote and/or make new nominations and worked on next week's GCOTW. Thanks. -- Slowking Man 08:00, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)