Thank you for uploading File:Fellowship-combat-assign.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ( talk) 04:20, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the read-through and fix on the video game credits table - I wasn't sure whether to cite all platforms or the first/primary development platform. Decided that getting the first cut for the article online seemed like a good idea, in the end, given how long that had been on my queue for! Cheers & Best wishes, David. Harami2000 ( talk) 03:12, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
I'm a bit confused as to why you reordered my reply to StrangeAttractor in Talk:Infocom. I was replying directly to him/her and not you. I've never seen anyone object as you did. Frotz ( talk) 06:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
{{ adminhelp}}
An anon user is vandalizing the game development article. He appears to get his jollies by inserting the same outrageous remarks into the article. Can the article be semi-protected or in some other manner protected for a while until he gets bored and goes away? Thanks. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 16:21, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, sorry, software is not eligible for speedy deletion. Please consider using WP:PROD instead! -- Pontificalibus ( talk) 17:01, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for listening to my suggestions and improving the article. It looks good now. Regards-- Bugnot ( talk) 05:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
If you are aware of it, please also include Sam Walton's final net-worth ie. net-worth at the time of his death.-- Bugnot ( talk) 05:49, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
The article The Fellowship (video game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
meco (
talk) 19:36, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
{{ adminhelp}}
An anon user is vandalizing the game development article (again). He appears to get his jollies by inserting the same outrageous remarks into the article. Can the article be semi-protected or in some other manner protected for a while until he gets bored and goes away? Thanks. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 18:28, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Fellowship-combat-result.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to somewhere on your talk page.Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 06:39, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Fellowship-combat-assign.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to somewhere on your talk page.Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 09:39, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Fellowship-game-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to somewhere on your talk page.Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 18:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Instead of just pasting in a {{references}} tag in this freshly started article, why not make us all goose-pimply-happy by helping to expand it?— Quicksilver T @ 19:02, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Frecklefoot! I don't know if you remember me, but quite some time ago we discussed a proposed restructure of the electronic games hierarchy. I sort of became upset with Wikipedia's model and style and moved on to Citizendium. (I made an article on Mario which I hope illustrates the stylistic differences--namely, to avoid "encyclopedese" and to omit citations for information that is common knowledge among experts.) With your background and experience you would immediately qualify as an editor of the games workgroup there. It's a project with many gaps but they all exist to be filled! I'd be ecstatic if you joined and made even small contributions because you are far more qualified than I am. Tristam ( talk) 09:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Hey. I've edited Game development article a bit. I would appreciate some input as you are basically the main writer of it. I tried to avoid POVs and inline ref'ed most of it. But it is semi-protected so half the users can't edit it now.
The article is currently Top and Start. It's a bit weird that Top article got so little attention (that is positive attention, hooker orgies aside). Also it should be at least B/C. I know you nominated it for FA a loong time ago, which it quickly failed. I would hope this can be brought to that slowly. — H3llkn0wz ▎ talk 17:55, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the barnstars! — H3llkn0wz ▎ talk 14:03, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Frecklefoot! I know I have been systematically murdering every unsourced sentence in the vast majority of game development article series you had pretty much written. There is a lot of subtle insight one cannot find and reference from a published source. Thanks for occasional corrections on places I slip! It's really hard to pick out facts that authors actually agree on.
I also want to ask your opinion on this VG task force proposal. There are very few knowledgeable, interested editors; yet industry series articles are badly in need of some love. What are your thoughts on this? — H3llkn0wz ▎ talk 16:33, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Hey. I am unsure if you have VG talk page on the watchlist, but may I direct you at this entry. Since I did not get many replies, it would be great if you could chime in and then we would hopefully have some consistency consensus on this.— H3llkn0wz ▎ talk 16:07, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I reversed your edit. All the games are in the list of rouguelike games and each game's wikipedia article describe it as rouguelike. Japanese wikipedia page list the total sale of the first Torneko game to be 800000. The correct thing to do is to add citation needed for each factual assertion instead of deleting it. Diablo is rouguelike-like while the Mystery Dungeon series are rouguelike. Vapour ( talk) 13:29, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
The gameplay of Mystery Dungeon series is described in a following manner. "Most of the Mystery Dungeon games centre around exploring a dungeon with randomly generated layouts and fighting other characters therein in a turn-based manner (and not just in fighting; every time the player takes a step, the opponents also take a step). Escape from the dungeon is usually only allowed in certain places, or through the use of certain items. Additionally, when the player loses the game the player loses all money plus half the player's items in the more forgiving variants, or loses everything and has to start from scratch in others." Vapour ( talk) 13:36, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
And few more articles. http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3166800 http://www.gamesetwatch.com/2008/03/play_the_delights_of_mystery_d.php
Hey. Are we listing the games developed or published? Because I was listing the games developed. Pure publishers would have no games. Developer self-published games would be mentioned. The same way the developer list works.— Hellknowz ▎ talk 15:23, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Deletion Wars - just few words ( Idot ( talk) 01:43, 9 May 2010 (UTC))
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CastleWolfensteinPickChest.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:17, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CastleWolfensteinSearchGuard.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:18, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.
I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.
Thank you.
Vyeh ( talk) 10:56, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs ( talk) 16:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
You removed my addition "because they are people" but the list already includes several people like Jason Rohrer. These are well-known indie designers with many games and so are the people I added. They release games under their own names. Where is the difference and how can we justify not including these people when they are indie game developers? Where should we include them?
WarGamerGirl ( talk) 16:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
I think is proper for my picture to stay there, but I was trying to explain the picture at the moment. Could you rollback it, please (with some repairs, so that it's not going to be an advertisement any more)? Alex discussion 22:07, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated X-COM : UFO Defense – A Novel, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-COM : UFO Defense – A Novel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Claritas § 19:03, 13 July 2010 (UTC)