![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archives: 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 |
Hi! I found a terrible section. It's too terrible for me to edit. So will you please correct here when you are not too busy? Thank you. Oda Mari ( talk) 07:29, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello Fg2. Thank you for your contributions to the article Yozo Matsushima. Regards, Masterpiece2000 ( talk) 12:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
In Hyūga class helicopter destroyer, one and only one sentence is accompanied by an in-line citation:
As you may know, this sentence may be construed as controversial in the context of an otherwise carefully-crafted article. -- Tenmei ( talk) 22:17, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your helpful edits to Hawayo Takata. You made some different choices than I did, but that's what Wikipedia is about! Consider placing it on your watchlist. Thanks. - House of Scandal ( talk) 04:24, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Dash.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 23:17, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Fg2,
On July 4,
Stormbay
prodded this article, and you contested the prod a day later. I think it probably fails
WP:N because I can't seem to find any substantial secondary sources, so I've listed it at
WP:AFD. Just thought I'd give you a heads-up if you want to comment.
Reyk
YO! 09:02, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:NonomiyaEma0298.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:CensusSide1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:54, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:CensusSide2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
You said in a recent edit summary "If the title is wrong, rename the article". Unfortunately when I did, someone changed it to Soviet invasion of Manchuria, and this is now up for discussion-- mrg3105 ( comms) ♠♥♦♣ 06:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your help with the peer review on Tsugaru clan; could you perhaps review it again? I nominated it for Good Article status, and it has yet to be reviewed. If not yourself, might there be someone else you know of who'd be willing to do so? At any rate, thanks. - Tadakuni ( talk) 00:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey Fg1-
My edit of the reading at Tsubaki Grand Shrine was a bit hasty, I think. I edited it today with the intention of going back later and fully fleshing out the article, and I did not expect an article with 6 edits over the course of its ~2 year history to be watched by anyone. I under estimated you! Anyways, I poked around the official site and I could not find a definitive reading either, but the site does link to this site, which gives the reading Tsubaki Ōkami Yashiro. Therefore, I reverted my edit, as つばきおおかみやしろ looks like it is the correct reading. I will be working on the article further, however and will keep my eyes open for any better sources for the reading. -- Torsodog Talk 21:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey Fg2, I just wanted to let you know that a derivative image I cropped a bit from one of your original Kyoto Tower images just made it to the main page via DYK. Great picture! -- Torsodog Talk 15:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
This images is flagged as havign a deprecated tag, PLEASE update it so the image can be moved to commons. :) Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 00:37, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Unwrapped steel, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unwrapped steel. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? User A1 ( talk) 02:28, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
hi there,
are you familiar with this topic Matsu no Ōrōka? I thought the Shiroshoin was part of the Honmaru Goten, which in itself was divided up into three parts? Could you also take a look and add information to Edo Castle when you have the chance? Thanks alot. Gryffindor 17:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Regarding the Anomebot's erroneous tagging of Tokyo City: although the bot is programmed to ignore dissolved municipalities, since the article hadn't been categorized as having been dissolved, the bot didn't spot it as such. The approriate categories look like this; Category:Dissolved municipalities of Ehime Prefecture: the bot simply looks for the word "dissolved" in a category name. Can you supply a list of dissolved municipalities, which I could add to the bot's placename blacklist, or suggest another heuristic which might detect these cases without explicit categorization? -- The Anome ( talk) 02:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions! -- RyRy ( talk) 22:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your cleanup here. It's been on my to-do forever, thanks for taking it off mine :) TravellingCari 20:37, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your helpful comment. I'm new to this, so I hope I got the reference formatting correct. Is it in the right format? Feel free to correct it. 76.183.49.157 ( talk) 20:15, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Will you please take a look at the Nihongo-template in the introductory paragraph of National Institute for Materials Science? I'm not entirely confident that I've handled this well enough.-- Tenmei ( talk) 14:08, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated ``high school musical`` ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Anshuk ( talk) 01:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
From what I understand there is more priority to remove unsourced contentious material, but as per WP:V and BLP unsourced material about any living person is in general a no no. In particular please see Jimbo Wales's "Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information" post here - http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046440.html WhisperToMe ( talk) 13:58, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
I believe I have addressed your comments on the FAC. Could you review my changes and replies?
Thanks for commenting,
-- Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 02:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
I like what you did with my recent additions to the Todaiji article, linking to Ritsuryo, enforcing consistent spelling and such. Much appreciated. Perhaps we can collaborate on other Japanese Buddhist articles sometime?
Cheers! -- Ph0kin ( talk) 11:48, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Fg2 ... You recently contested the PROD of
with the edit summary
Removed deletion proposal. Objecting to deletion. Detailed references are in the article.
I beg to differ, but there do not appear to be any " references" in the article at all, "detailed" or otherwise ... Happy Editing! — 72.75.110.31 ( talk · contribs) 03:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Give them this:
{{
cite book}}
: Unknown parameter |isbn13=
ignored (
help)Tip: When looking for sources, look for third parties who are likely to have written about the subject, rather than supporting it with material that is for the subject rather than about it. Uncle G ( talk) 14:10, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi Fg2. I'm surprised people are opposed to this article so much. It clearly is a large, important education course from what is a very large and important organization. Anyway, if you look on Lexis Nexis you will find plenty of sources, including a NY Times story from just after World War 2 that describes the course as "unprecedented". Incidentally, there seems to be a possible COI problem here with the people that are going to write the article. I'm not sure if their goals and style of writing is aligned with the Wikipedia norm. -- C S ( talk) 19:14, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
This article could do with attention similar to that given to the other film article. Uncle G ( talk) 14:10, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Here's another: It's a Summer Vacation Everyday. Finding and citing sources is exactly the right approach to article rescue. Well done. Keep doing it! Uncle G ( talk) 16:56, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks much for your efforts in cleaning up and consolidating the plot summary. I am wondering whether to leave it as is (it seems a fine summary; brief and clear), or whether to expand it out to a rather lengthy scene-by-scene or act-by-act summary as I did for Yoshitsune Senbon Zakura. While I certainly could summarize and reword the plot summary given on Kabuki21.com, I have neither seen nor read this play; by contrast, I have read through Yoshitsune in translation and had at that time the full formally-published English-language text to cite.
I am curious as to your thoughts on the matter. Is it called for to write a lengthy act-by-act summary? Is it preferable, unpreferable? Yoroshiku. LordAmeth ( talk) 20:13, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, based on your excellent work on the Todaiji article, I was wondering if I could get your help on another article, the Kukai article. I've done some extensive revisions on the article to make it more concise, but still retain the hard work someone else did (and tried to intersperse citations and templates where appropriate). I could use your critical eye in making sure it's a quality article. Feel free to make edits, or just reply back to me with suggestions. Whatever works.
Thanks!
-- Ph0kin ( talk) 15:15, 9 December 2008 (UTC)