![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
I am no longer able to aide the editor, whatever must be done with him/her is out of my hands. Do as you wish with the article to maintain its integrity. Thanks for the work with it. See you around :) Keegan ( talk) 05:26, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
If you think, it's fair! Ok, man! Good luck! But you wrong! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.6.246.125 ( talk) 21:58, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
But I did not do it. This is a shared computer, owned by the University of South Carolina. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.253.4.163 ( talk) 19:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
please remove the images from Ali.they are highly offensive —Preceding unsigned comment added by Almortian ( talk • contribs) 12:41, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
VenomousConcept ( talk) 14:38, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
RE: this reversion. WP:RY does not apply to dates of the year articles. While I agree that semi-notable entries shouldn't be included in the days of the year articles, citing WP:RY as a reason for removal is not appropriate. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 18:26, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Happy editing!
[midnight comet] [talk] 01:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi Favonian, I have started 3 pages and they are very valid. Please check the 2 websites that I referenced. I am new to using wiki so please keep that in consideration. Please check http://www.evenelson.com, http://www.breakingrecordsmusic.com. Thank you Sincerely77 ( talk) 04:49, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
User Bal537 is a vandal. He has trying hard to manipulate information.
There was a reference to Light Infantary which was added by this vandal into the Chamar Section.
Light Infantary consisted only of Mazhabis and Ramdasias (Weavers, Julahas)
This Vandal has also tried to manipulate Table "Ethnic groups, Social groups and tribes of the Punjab" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravinder121 ( talk • contribs) 11:26, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia naming policy articles are to be located at the most commonly used name. Eric of Pomerania is never referred to as Eric 7 but invariably as Eric of Pomerania. This is like moving Gorm the Old to Gorm 1 or Magnus the Pious to Magnus 1st. Noone will search for Eric 7. The article has to be moved back. ·Maunus·ƛ· 18:54, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
No problem. Is Bal537 the problem here or not. Please know: I think it would be better to try to explain what is going on rather than continue to block the person. I think that wikipeida can be VERY confusing, and threatening messages being sent to him/her isn't helping. I'm lucky that I was able to understand wikipedia. I think what helped me out the most with wikipedia was that I was offered help with this link. I don't think it is fair if a user is confused with all of the policies and guidelines, and gets punished for not knowing what (s)he did wrong.-- Cubs197 ( talk) 21:17, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
I have now replaced the 'speedy deletion' template with a 'possible copyright violation' template. This removes the content from view, but the article content actually is still there (if you edit the page). Once the OTRS permission has been processed, then - if it is OK - the OTRS ticket number will be added to this talk page, and the notice on the article will be removed. This may take several days, so please be patient.
Once the copyright status is sorted out, then we will see what happens; the article might still be deleted for other reasons, but we need to resolve this matter first.
Chzz ► 09:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello Favonian, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I contested the speedy deletion of Ratan Rajput - a page you tagged - because: The article makes a credible assertion of notability, sufficient to pass A7. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. NW ( Talk) 22:50, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi Favonian, I am tuopuo.Please please donot delete my articles.You are a famous editor you should help new editors.Why u delete the articles.PIDE was not an external link.what are you doing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuopuo ( talk • contribs) 13:32, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello Favonian, My intention was not to spam. The links i added were not spam either. I didnt use any bot to enter those links. They were legitimate links, that contain information about the artist. You can verify the links. I would appreciate if you let me re-add the links, you rolled back.
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluejackal06 ( talk • contribs) 19:55, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi Favonian, some guy named Orange Mike deleted my page and accused me of "self promotion" I am not the person I wrote about..and am dismayed at this introduction to Wiki. Would you be able to assist me in this matter? thanks in advance Sincerely77 ( talk) 21:13, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Can you help me please? I've listed an article for AfD, but its not showing up on Today's Log, its just really confusing. Could you show me the ropes of AfD's as this one needs to be speedy deleted? -- Scythre ( talk) 20:50, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey I just wanted to let you know I switched your CSD from copyright g12 to blatant advertising g11. The creator is claiming that he has the rights to repost the article from the website but from his comments and the look of the article it sure looks like a conflict of interest and meant solely to advertise him. Jamesofur ( talk) 23:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I changed the text and removed the advertising aspects of it. Let me know what else I can do to keep this article active. Thanks. Sarstarco ( talk) 18:04, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Ya, bummer. Thanks for the info though. I'll work on those sources and try again. Sarstarco ( talk) 19:41, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
So there's no way to request speedy deletion even though it's clearly advertising and has no sources whatsoever? XXX antiuser 09:31, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
At Kendra Todd, looking at the history, all of the edits have been done by someone on Verizon Wireless which is a highly dynamic range. Although the IP you reported got blocked, I will bet he will be back on another IP in a short time. Someone requested page protection at WP:RPP already to stop these "whack a mole" IP's. Momo san Gespräch 20:00, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Oops! Didn't leave a talkback notice! (It hasn't been reverted since, by the way) I dream of horses @ 01:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
(Thought I'd make use of the already titled section!) -- Cpl Syx ( talk) 08:46, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello Favonian, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Vito cataffo - a page you tagged - because: having a show on Channel Four is surely a claim of importance/significance. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. So Why 21:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
I removed the stub temp you added to the "Providence Church" article, because I think it gives enough information to be start-class. I don't think it really matters that the article has no references, or needs to be overhauled. Mind you, it probably needs more work than a good stub, but that's typical for a first article. However, edit mercilessly, critique mercifully, or in other words, revert it if you want. I won't revert it back. -- I dream of horses 01:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Though I agree with and much appreciate your correction to the article on Prince Carl Philip of Sweden, I was rather shocked to see some wording in your edit summary here. The prince's situation is quite complicated. It is possible isn't it that that user may have misunderstood? Maybe there is other evidence I don't know of that the user of that IP is a mcp? I'm sorry for not minding my own business in this case, but I have tried the hard way to learn to assume good faith, and I try very hard nowadays not to use any offensive, accusatory wording. Cordially, SergeWoodzing ( talk) 08:22, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much for reinstating the Aschenbach-sourced material about Druyan's scientific interests before she met Sagan. Yours is the second revert of this material that I recall. I am very disappointed at how protective some "editors" (often anonymous) can be in protecting their heroes from the truth of their lives. Recently a cabal of editors (not anonymous) removed all mention of Velikovsky from "Popularization of Science" section of Carl Sagan's entry so that the scientific errors he made in criticizing Worlds in Collision would be suppressed. Phaedrus7 ( talk) 15:59, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Great minds think alike. Just as you were adding a prod to Anastasia Ganias, I was adding a prod for the same reasons. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:41, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with Stan Brock today! Patchen ( talk) 17:58, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Favonian! You are invited to participate in the
Great Wikipedia Dramaonly, an effort to end arguments and discussions, and fight vandalism! It is intended to stop discussions from interfering everyone's work in the article namespace. Please sign up
here!
Kayau
Wuthering Heights
VANITY FAIR
paradise lost 10:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{ Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 01:24, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
The article World domination has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Steve Dufour (
talk) 02:13, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Why would you add these tags when this hasn't been proven. A banned IP only makes this claim and no one can prove that I am Anoshirawan who got banned a year ago. Please remove these tags.-- Inuit18 ( talk) 08:58, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Religious_response_to_ART#Removal_of_EL. Joe407 ( talk) 11:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
sorry mate, the message was met for name change, as directed by wiki tell me then how i should request for name change, or you do it for me if you ve admin rights chees Knowledge is power! 13:05, 18 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fngosa ( talk • contribs)
Am a new user. There is no need for "slapping my wrist". Still learning the ropes.
Pallavy (
talk) 13:26, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Pallavy
thanks for the help...new to this wiki thing, tried to copy the loch lomond lake in scotalnd info box, but couldn't figure out how to upload my picture for the lake as opposed to the one...anyways work in progress
thanks,
doug
Geejou ( talk) 22:54, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
While I was in the process of posting this article, and adding a Wikipedia copyright approval notice to the talk page per the instructions of the Wikipedia editor who went over the copyright permission issues with me, you recommended the article for Speedy Deletion.
Now you seem to want me to do more. Why isn't what I did enough? Psychiatry777 ( talk) 15:03, 20 August 2009 (UTC) {{permissionOTRS|ticket=https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=3427654}}
Hello again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psychiatry777 ( talk • contribs) 18:53, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your reverts. William Avery ( talk) 09:59, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Someone vandalized my Userspace!
But a little angel came along and fixed it!
Thank you! You can thank others by using {{
subst:Vangel}}!
[midnight comet]
[talk] 13:36, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
You are most welcome, and am sure you would do the same if it was my page :-) MaenK.A. Talk 12:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
What datas i have given is 100% right i wil also give reference for that please reconsider after i add reference.
Thank you Rajnwiki ( talk) 12:03, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Please reconsider the Article Sivaji Ganesan, i have added a reference from a valid and Famous Website http://www.dinakaran.com
http://www.dinakaran.com/cinema/english/biodata/sivaji.htm
Thank you, Rajnwiki ( talk) 12:13, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey favonian, I'm new to wikipedia, but i have tried to write an article on a member of a band, but it says that it is nominated for speedy deletion. I have put 100% true information, and a decent amount of it so far. he is a new member, so there is not alot to say about his career currently. Please help(or don't delete my artcle)
If you don't know what article it is, it is here wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_De_Pasquale
Thank you, Nick De Pasquale —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nant22 ( talk • contribs) 21:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I saw that my recent edit to the Manchester Ciy footballer Stephen Ireland was deleted as the post was believed to be libellous, this certainly isn't the case. I actually have first hand sources and individuals very close to the family who have relayed this information to me!
please do not delete my pages as they are very valid. i am new to wikipedia, this is my first time adding anything, our organization is very valid and as i stated before on the talk page, if mine is deleted, then wikipedia will have to delete the other organizations which are already listed and same or similar in nature. i dont think wikipedia is allowed to use favoritism. also, one of the persons who put in for deletion i noticed on their page believes the world would be a better place without religion.....this feels rather personal and attacking in nature from teapotgeorge. what do you need me to send you to prove our organization is legit? we are a nonprofit training education (faith based) organization, which according to wiki rules speedy deletion does not even apply in the first place. i beleive you can view our credentials on the NC Secretary of State website. Atlantic Messianic Alliance of America. also shumenweb says i am being blocked? how so? i am only trying to post valid content. the rules of blocking dont apply according to wiki. everything i have posted is truth and valid content. Rabbi Crawford ( talk) 20:51, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
how do you edit then without getting everyone mad? good grief! this seems like its impossible and a waste of time! how about helping instead of knocking people down?! i'm speaking of wiki in general. noone has offered help only deletions. i am new and i was trying to get content on there. would you like me to have someone else post it from their account and get the same message out?> how do you expect this to be done? Rabbi Crawford ( talk) 21:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
seems like it would have been nicer to ask someone to edit instead of deleting- which it was deleted. i tried to redo it is all. and there was nothing negative. i am the president of an organization and noone else is currently authorized to do anything public wihtout approval through the president. so the organization is not owned by me- just watched over. there was no trying to sell anything- as one person put it on the deletion posting. Rabbi Crawford ( talk) 21:26, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi Favonian - just to make you aware, the user who seems to have a hatred for "ae" (maybe all things Latin... who knows?) is still responding on my userspace. I'm believe that I've got the issue covered with my reply, but if you feel like chipping in then please feel free! -- Cpl Syx ( talk) 08:52, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Do you have knowledge of what you've denied me in my affair of editing the page ali ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dawesalm ( talk • contribs) 14:46, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
I ask my question more clear, do you know about the subject you are disputing on ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dawesalm ( talk • contribs) 15:10, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
hey are you rocognizing what your doing ?! interfering in matters not at all related to you and you have no knowledge of ! try not to act like a teacher cos we're not the student and do not interfere in things ive done here anymore —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dawesalm ( talk • contribs) 23:01, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
As I work at Rampton Hospital ,I should know the facts ,do you not think?. Ramptonman ( talk) 21:03, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Are you suggesting that to protect the new identities of these offenders from their victims,the victim's family and the general public is permissable?.If so,what gives you the right?.You even deleted offfenders real names which is a matter of public record.Blocking me will only be a simple change of username and IP address.The truth shall not be witheld from the British public at any cost. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramptonman ( talk • contribs) 00:19, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
I checked "what links here" for the infobox and picked up a few others. Thanks for letting me know. Rich Farmbrough, 13:40, 27 August 2009 (UTC).
How long will i be blocked for.
Happy editing!
[midnight comet] [talk] 00:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |