Welcome to Wikipedia, EpidemiaCorinthiana! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
FrigidNinja and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
helpme}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Frigid Ninja 23:34, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of FIFA Club World Cup participants, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages OFC, AFC and CAF ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Honorável membro do bando de loucos, sua candidatura rodou. Como são mais duas semanas até uma possível segunda tentativa, isso pode ser uma boa alternativa pra esperar. igordebraga ≠ 22:16, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Well, if you know people who usually review this kind of thing you could ask them to take a look at the article, cutting the wait. igordebraga ≠ 23:13, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I think I can. igordebraga ≠ 17:41, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
I have blocked User:Nickst for breaking the three-revert rule at Template:FIFA Club World Cup. Technically speaking you did not break the 3RR yourself, but your actions still constituted edit-warring and I'd advise you to avoid such behaviour in the future - I came within a hair's-breadth of blocking your account as well. I'm going to assume that the two IP editors who continued reverting Nickst were not you; if future investigation shows that they were, expect to be blocked for sockpuppetry. It's very simple: do not edit-war, even if you believe you are in the right. Yunshui 雲 水 15:05, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently,
List of FIFA Club World Championship and Club World Cup goalscorers (one goal), has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's
notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be
merged,
redirected, or
deleted. Please consider adding
reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:
"List of FIFA Club World Championship and Club World Cup goalscorers (one goal)" –
news ·
books ·
scholar ·
JSTOR ·
free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia!
VoxelBot 00:52, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I've reverted your redirect of this list. The article was kept at this deletion discussion, albeit by lack of consensus, so it'd probably be best to start another discussion if you think it shouldn't be here at all. cheers, Struway2 ( talk) 14:06, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Okay, a quick look at some of your edits has shown that you're moving pages without consensus, and, worse, copying and pasting from one to another. This is entirely unacceptable, see WP:COPYPASTE for more information. If you'd like some assistance with what you're trying to achieve, please let me know and I'll see what I can do. In the meantime, please slow down and try to remain calm. Best wishes, The Rambling Man ( talk) 16:43, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of FIFA Club World Championship and Club World Cup goalscorers (one goal) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of FIFA Club World Championship and Club World Cup goalscorers (one goal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NickSt ( talk) 02:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
You must not remove an AfD tag from an article while the deletion discussion is underway, as you did in this edit. Whether you think the discussion is irrelevant does permit you to do this. This is made very clear in the text you removed. By all means express your opinion in the linked discussion, but if you remove the tag again I will block you from editing Wikipedia. -- Finlay McWalterჷ Talk 03:14, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
EpidemiaCorinthiana ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The admin who blocked me merely blocked me out of spite, it seems. Not even a 3RR. Interestingly, this came about after I mentioned that a suspiciously looking Tag Team was taking place especially when you see his pattern of edits. Never mind that the he blocked me for 3 days for almost nothing.
Decline reason:
Per WP:3RR, that "is not an entitlement to revert a page a specific number of times". You removed an AfD notice after a discussion was started, the text of the comment within the template makes it very clear that you cannot, and you were warned not to do so. This block appears justified. Kinu t/ c 04:00, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Floquenbeam (
talk) 18:28, 16 March 2013 (UTC) |