Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Abraham Olatunde David instead.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

This page appears to have been written to praise its subject rather than to describe the subject neutrally. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view.

If this draft is resubmitted without being reworked, it may be nominated for deletion. You may ask for advice about the tone of articles at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abraham Olatunde David and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon ( talk) 01:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Engrdrizzy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon ( talk) 01:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abraham Olatunde David is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Olatunde David until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reading Beans ( talk) 06:45, 21 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Greeting friends, this article has been marked for AFD, and I have tried to improve it to my best capacity so that it wouldn't be deleted. I have even asked other contributors in my community to help me with the improvement. Please I need help to making it look standard as this is my first article and I do not hope that it would be deleted. Thank you a lot. It is indeed fascinating to be here. Engrdrizzy ( talk) 13:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Simon Okeke. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and all statement must be verifiable. See WP:V. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans ( talk) 04:50, 25 June 2023 (UTC) reply

*Ready for review thank you for your concern. Please the article has been improved and enough reliable sources has been linked to it. It has also been moved to the mainspace. Please it is ready for review. Thank you kindly. Engrdrizzy ( talk) 14:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Engrdrizzy, the sources are still PR puff pieces. I’ll need to nominate it for deletion to garner broader consensus. Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 05:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Reading Beans, but I believe the subject is notable and have adequate sources required by the notability policy? I think it can be better improved with additional reliable secondary sources. thank you. Engrdrizzy ( talk) 07:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Bartholomew Okorochukwu. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because moved to mainspace by sockpuppet of User:Hilspress. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 21:34, 29 July 2023 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Bartholomew Okorochukwu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:26, 22 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Engrdrizzy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Miracle Nwobodo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 11:05, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Engrdrizzy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abraham Olatunde David, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 01:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply