Welcome!
Hello, Edoderoo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --
Flockmeal 23:20, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)
Good work creating new articles and contributing to exisiting ones. When you make contributions, be careful that you don't include copyrighted material. Copyright rules are complicated, so take some time to review Wikipedia:Copyrights. A good general rule is that most things on the internet are already copyrighted by someone else, so they cannot be contributed to wikipedia. Again, content from webpages is usually copyrighted and cannot be added to wiki. Keep up the good work, and feel free to contact me with questions. Feco
Dear Sir Dimtri Nikolaj & Estimable mr. Edo de Roo: I herewith like to really thank you for your helpfull support in the case of my recent astonishing blocking up from further editing again. In the mean time with best regards I remain faithfully yours: D.A. Borgdorff - e.i. MASc. by 86.83.155.44 ( talk) 14:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi there, I think you created this page in the wrong space, and may want to move it to User:Edoderoo/monobook.css. Cheers - Kingpin 13 ( talk) 08:03, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sophie Letcher requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact
one of these administrators to request that the administrator
userfy the page or email a copy to you.
Travelbird (
talk) 10:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Ik bedoelde aan te geven dat het vandalisme een subjectieve waarde is. De artikel-inhoud wordt namelijk niet aangetast, enkel de werksfeer en de interne machtsverhouding back stage. Hij is in zijn handelen niet de 1e, omdat het systeem nu eenmaal onoplosbare gaten heeft. Het is beter om na te denken hoe die gaten te verbeteren zijn dan iedereen die anders is te elimineren. Dat lukt namelijk niet, zoals blijkt. Gr. Barvloer ( talk) 20:22, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Teylers invites you to a Backstage event | ||
Thanks for your contribution to the Multilingual Challenge! We'd like to invite you to a special Backstage event during the Museum Weekend on April 14th. If you have special requests but can't make it to the event, please leave your comments on the collaboration page. |
Gjjanse ( talk) 09:22, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Great work getting a photo of her. Thanks!-- andreasegde ( talk) 14:41, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Are there no concerns regarding the OTRS permission that you have just used to tag File:Photo_of_Prof_Raj_Reddy_taken_in_Hyderabad.jpg? I do understand AGF but the uploader says that the photo was taken specifically for the purposes of Wikipedia but in fact the declaration on the file page says that it was taken 8 months ago. In the interval, the uploader has had some severe problems both here and at Commons with regard to image uploads relating to Reddy. One such example can be seen here, and it became evident that the uploader did not in fact have the permissions etc that they claimed. In my opinion, this one is also dodgy, although I cannot support that with anything other than my experience. - Sitush ( talk) 09:01, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm really not sure what you are trying to do here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/see otrs
An WP:AFD discussion is normally named to identify the article it proposes for deletion. We have no article named See otrs. 66.102.83.61 ( talk) 16:32, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for your assistance on IRC today! Lankiveil ( speak to me) 14:36, 11 July 2015 (UTC) |