Thank you @
Nick Moyes. This will definitely help me.
August 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to
Oscar Martinez (The Office) has been undone by an automated computer program called
ClueBot NG.
ClueBot NG makes very few
mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please
read about it,
report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
Hello. I thought (by way of encouragement) that I might paste in my reply to your recent post at the Teahouse:
@
Editingwork8: (back again) ...because Wikipedia attracts an inordinate amount of vandalism by silly schoolkids and other bored individuals, we have various automated tools to revert to most obvious bad faith edits. Content deletion is one such common form of it. The 'bots' aren't always 100% correct (just as humans aren't either) and I think in this instance the bot was wrong. It left an automated edit on your talk page, with a link to enable you to report this as an inappropriate revert, with instructions to then repeat the edit. I would support you doing that, as it's clear there are ongoing and sensible attempts to remove 'fancruft' (trivia) from the article. You did the right thing asking here; when it comes to another human doing something you don't understand, it's often best to directly approach them {politely) on their talk page and ask for clarification of what you did wrong. Not possible with software, of course.
On a different note, it's great to see you as a qualified librarian wanting to contribute to Wikipedia. Are you aware of
this project bringing museums, libraries and Wikipedia together for the greater good? Or the #1lib#1ref hashtag - a worldwide event encouraging librarians to add references to articles (
see here for more). Finally, I note your talk page says you're interesting in adding content to start and C-class articles, but don't forget the '
STUB' articles which are even shorter and need more TLC, but reward you with easy improvements You can find them via so-called 'wiki-projects' which are simply editors with common interests working to improve that one topic area. Each Wikiproject usually has a table showing the number of articles relating to it, both by importance (low to top) and also by quality assessment (Stub to Featured Article). So, at that Projects's first section (
Article quality assessment) I see there are currently 2,525 stub articles, of which 763 have been assessed for their 'importance' to that project. I then note there are 69 stub articles deemed as 'High Importance' which could be worked on first to greatest effect. Just click on the number to see a list of those articles ((
example). Browsing through them reveals pages like the
Ailefroide which have no inline sources, and just one external link. These are the things that some editors get real motivation from when they find topics that interest them and appreciate that they can easily improve the encyclopaedia. That's a really empowering feeling. Good luck in all you do.
Nick Moyes (
talk) 19:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Nick Moyes, I'm glad that you found my edit done right. I didn't know about
this project, but soon will discover and contribute to that. Yes, I'm looking up to 'Stub' articles as well. I'm here for improvements and will do my part in delivering my best as a contributor. Thanks for guiding me and considering my worth on Wikipedia. Really grateful and looking for more friendly and supportive Wikipedia contributors like you in future.
August 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to
Oscar Martinez (The Office) has been undone by an automated computer program called
ClueBot NG.
ClueBot NG makes very few
mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please
read about it,
report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
Hi Editingwork8! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, Suggestion for Oscar Martinez (The Office) page, has been
archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion
here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hi Editingwork8! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, My edit has been undone by ClueBot NG, has been
archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion
here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hi Editingwork8! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, Radio Channel site for references?, has been
archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion
here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hi Editingwork8! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can this site be used for referencing?, has been
archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion
here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hi Editingwork8! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, Chatbot has undone my edit, has been
archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion
here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hi Editingwork8! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, Suggestions for Artificial Intelligence page required, has been
archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion
here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hi Editingwork8! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, Suggestions/Approval required for the edit plan, has been
archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion
here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hi Editingwork8! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, Citation Suggestion, has been
archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion
here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hi Editingwork8! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, Company name with references added to AI companies of India page. Removed., has been
archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion
here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hi Editingwork8! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, Please let me know how to make this company page work on Wikipedia. I'm open for suggestions/improvements., has been
archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion
here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hi Editingwork8! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, Please review and suggest improvements, has been
archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion
here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hi Editingwork8! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Please don't mark as minor when you're ADDING sources.Graywalls (
talk) 07:12, 23 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Hello, I'm
Graywalls. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
AAR type A switcher truck, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Forum posts can not be used as a post.Graywalls (
talk) 08:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Please look through the things I have reverted. When you add a reference to something, the source needs to directly support the contents you're adding to support rather than being generally related to the topic.
Graywalls (
talk) 08:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Graywalls Ok. I'll take care of that. Thanks for guiding me
October 2020
The sources you have been recently adding are questionable and certainly not reliable - please review
WP:RS.
GiantSnowman 10:49, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
@
Giant Sure, thanks.reply
In addition, you are required by the
Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See
Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.
Theroadislong (
talk) 09:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Theroadislong Thanks for guiding me. But, luckily I'm free from any connection that leads to Kunal Lalani. Hope you get it clearly and won't repeat the same in future.
Your thread has been archived
Hi Editingwork8! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is bloomberg a reliable source?, has been
archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion
here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hi Editingwork8! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, AirBnb, has been
archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion
here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Hello, Editingwork8. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Kunal Lalani (1), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under
CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request
userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available
here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.
FireflyBot (
talk) 07:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)reply