I copied this template from someone else and just plugged in my own text! And all I wanted to do was say thank you... :( Dppowell 02:49, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Just to let you know you put your oppose vote on Nyttend Rfa in the support section. You may want to fix that. Have a nice day.-- SJP 22:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
I adjusted your edit on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Nyttend.-- Snakese 22:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
I've been wanting to, but I've been reluctant to do so since this whole thing blew up lest someone twist it into accusing me of breaking my agreement to refrain from engaging in the activity in question while this is sorted out. I realize that that's hardly what I'm doing at all--explaining a prior "vote" is by no means the same as casting a new one--but it wouldn't surprise me if certain individuals tried to claim that it is. I realize the vast majority of people will be sane enough to realize how absurd that claim is, but it's still something that might give them ammo. I'd rather not get sidetracked fighting that; I'd rather not give them the ammunition to throw at me.
By the way, good luck on your Rfa. I just noticed it. It looks like you will be promoted. Congrats in advanced. Have a nice day.-- SJP 20:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations you are now an administrator! Secretlondon 01:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Congrats man! How is it having the extra buttons? :) Glass Cobra 22:11, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
You're my first pro Rfa admin vote ever, and one of the few times where who I vote for actually makes it to become one! Bravo and glad to see someone I wanted to be promoted to admin, actually become an admin, and make it. This makes me feel like a winner too, so I celebrate with you! hehe Giovanni33 06:05, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes, that was me at Haunted Angel's RFA. I had been auto-logged out and changed my mind halfway through about whether it was important to attach my username to my comments. It would be cool if you could sign on while doing edits, without losing your edits. Right, I don't do RFA's very much. Usually only if I run across a link to one of them while wasting time on something else. Matchups 03:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I was wondering why you declined the CSD of Image:Jonouchi Linework.jpg when three other images from the same set were immediately CSD. They had invalid fair use rationals, and they also appear to be copyright violations being the reproduction and selling of printed works from the studio. Thanks :) AnmaFinotera 03:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support with respect to my request for adminship, which successfully closed today with a count of 47 support, 1 oppose. If you ever see me doing anything that makes you less than pleased that you supported my request, I hope to hear about it from you. See you around Wikipedia! Accounting4Taste 05:08, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Could you please unblock Hesperian please? He was accidentally blocked by another admin. Thanks, Auroranorth ( sign) 05:57, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear East718, I noticed that you have removed the above-mentioned photograph. With reference to my earlier message to User_talk:BetacommandBot, just wish to let you know that on 26 October 2007 I wrote to an Office of the Majlis of Iran ([email protected]), requesting them to inspect the photograph at issue. The following is part of my message:
In view of this, I should like to request you kindly to restore the photograph. Above all, they (i.e. the Majlis) cannot claim not to have known about this photograph. I have my original text sent to the Majlis, and should ever anyone claim that this photograph has been unlawfully on the Wikipedia page, I am prepared to make the full text of my e-mail to the Majlis available for proving the contrary (I have in addition a digital document showing that my e-mail to the Majlis has been received and read). With thanks in advance, Yours sincerely, --BF 15:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
I have clarified my wordings on question 5 of my RfA. Please read my clarifications to see if you wish to switch your stance. OhanaUnited Talk page 18:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I also nominated two other character articles for deletion. I was wondering if you could make a decision on those (i.e. delete or tell me to AFD those in a separate disucssion). hbdragon88 19:16, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
I've placed a {{
hangon}}
tag on
HNTTMM after the article's current author requested time to improve the article. I say let's give him some time to do so, but keep an eye on the article and see if it really does improve or not. The page is almost entirely list-cruft and table-cruft, and the remaining material would not be nearly enough to justify a full article, so my guess is that it will likely be deleted again soon. But I say let's give the guy a chance to assert its notability and improve the content. :) —
KieferSkunk (
talk) — 19:31, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
i made the change on that on the UFC page... so i shouldnt put "future events" on the page?
and i was the user that put "This fight was later shown on a UFC Unleashed telecast"... i shouldn't put that either? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsmacko ( talk • contribs) 22:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Many thanks for your action! It was getting pretty boring reverting teenage silliness day after day... Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 22:50, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Certainly. I'm heading out for a bit, but I'll take a look at it either later tonight or tomorrow. Tuckdogg 23:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Found these. (IP/User, diff#)
Let me know if you need anything else. Tuckdogg 20:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I didn't add your cloak, I'll do it now :) Majorly ( talk) 01:07, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Good luck! — H 2O — 02:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
No problem. Congrats on the adminship. Do good out there :D. Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 05:16, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I thought you dealt with this editor's spurious oppose quite impressively, and with much more tact than I would have used. He blankets all self-noms with the same tripe, and it is time someone called him on it. Are a few self-noms power-hungry? Perhaps. Is someone that "views all self-noms as prima facie evidence of power hunger" a bit of a wikidick? I think so. I thought you dealt with the guy as best as you possibly could have, given the circumnstances. A fine start to what I'm sure will be distinguished service as an admin. Keep it up! K. Scott Bailey 03:09, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, I certainly accept your apology. I appreciate that reexamination.-- John Foxe 11:05, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Putting "Fuck (anything) at WP:AN is hardly appropriate, especially for an admin. If you want to point an there is a bigger backlog elsewhere, fine, but disparaging another admin task is hardly appropriate. — Rlevse • Talk • 11:52, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
In edit summary user wrote, 'I said, I'd recreate this article'. The meaning of article is beyond my grasp. Perhaps you know history because you have protected similar article RX-178 Gundam Mk-II.
Thanks. TRIRASH 14:45, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. Thanks for swiftly protecting Chrysler Hemi engine. One question, though: I notice the usual advisory box ("This article is protected against editing by" etc.) does not show up. I've no especial objection to this, I'm just curious why not. -- Scheinwerfermann 16:03, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations on your successful request for adminship. I am glad you passed, and you are welcome for the support. Don't forget to view the school for new admins as well. Good luck! :) Acalamari 22:11, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, when you close an AFD, especially a complex one like this, it's important to remove most incoming links to the deleted article(s) from other articles. A lot of these pages still have inbound article links, and even redirect pages (although now a bot deletes those). I know it's a pain... but over the years a bunch of redlinks to AFD'd articles seep into our articles... it takes continuous vigilance to curb that. -- W.marsh 22:44, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey, sorry if I interrupted that process. I was removing some of the linked articles and came across a few that you were doing at the same time. Okiefromokla talk to me 23:11, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I have changed my block to indef, and reverted the talkpage to the template placed by you. When I originally blocked there had only been the vandalism to Justin Timberlake, per the report at AIV. I agree the personal attack(s) justified the indef. My practice is to block first (reduces disruption) and notify later. Cheers. LessHeard vanU 22:47, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, East718. Can you please send me the contents of List of foreign consulates in Minneapolis so I may restore the information to Wikipedia or use it again without repeating all of the research it took to create this page? Please copy this to my talk page if you would. Thank you in advance. - Susanlesch 23:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Just a quick note to say thanks for confirming the notability on this article -- DatRoot 00:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
the same vandal you blocked earlier today, User:71.193.244.183, is back at it as User:89.21.8.105 contribs, adding the same links and so on. There's an open BIO/N report about this article; Hucksarmy forum posted an open call for attacks on the page to remove all criticism, and since them the page has been repeatedly attacked in this manner. ThuranX 00:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
No doubt man, congrats. I know you'll be great, especially with protecting the MMA pages. good job.
The Anti-Vandalism King 00:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
My RFA | ||
Hey man! I wanted to drop you a line to say thanks for your support in my request for adminship, which ended with 61 supports, 3 opposes, and 1 neutral. Hopefully I'll do as well in my first few days as you have! Feel free to call on me if you ever need any backup! Let's go whack some vandals, eh? Glass Cobra 01:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC) |
Please note that when closing AfDs, the {{ afdb}} template goes above the section header, not below. Putting it below will screw things up. Thanks! — Kurykh 05:35, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting me in my recent RFA which unfortunately did not pass at (47/23/5). I will be sure to improve my editing skills and wait till someone nominates me next time. Have a great day(or night)! -- Hdt83 Chat 05:40, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi East ... you might have supposed that offering to mentor another editor was an interesting and useful thing to do. I have to warn you that this is not the case here. If the mentee (ie me) has editing problems, then it's been found nearly impossible to define what they are in dozens(?) of un-structured and largely evidence-free "disciplinaries" on me. And being my mentor and not finding problems is a quick way to get yourself into huge trouble. User:Geni suffered a great deal of harassment (see the deletion long on this "Attack Page" on her) - but her successor has had even more trouble.
Having said which, I'm only asking for someone prepared to do the thing honestly, so you'd be entirely acceptable to me. Since the terms of the mentorship were that I got to choose my own mentor, I'm prepared to accept you forthwith. Preferably with User:Kendrick7 who seems to be experienced but otherwise of whom I know very little, or on your own if you prefer. PR talk 12:40, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with this: "Editors may still be blocked even if they have made three or fewer reverts in a 24 hour period, if their behavior is clearly disruptive. Efforts to game the system, for example by persistently making three reverts each day or three reverts on each of a group of pages, cast an editor in a poor light and may result in blocks." If you had done your homework, you may have perhaps noticed that those last 4 reverts by User:UBeR were only the latest in a long, LONG series of essentially the same reverts that are evidently part of a continual effort on his part, as well as a few others, to block any major updates or improvements to the politically sensitive global warming article, and its related wikis. He's been adamant, for instance, about keeping "Solar Variation" listed one of the "Causes" despite it having been rendered inconsequential by climate researchers as being a factor in current global warming. He even went so far as to have an RFC on the matter and then tried to ignore the results when they weren't what he wanted. I've had multiple issues dealing with troublesome editors like UBeR in politically touchy wiki articles -- not to mention a virtual army of sockpuppets, meatpuppets and anonymous IP's -- and it would be nice to have more admins involved in preventing such gaming, but instead I tend to have to deal with stuff like this. -BC aka Callmebc 13:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi! First I would really thank wikipedia and, foremost, the people that make it going -- people like you. I come from a village in Herzegovina, and throughout this century it has vittnesed many atrosities. So I desided to make a page about it, on wikipedia. Among the thing that I wrote is the genocide aginst the Serbs in 1941, in Prebilovci. And on the title I used genocide -- a user named rijeka, from croatia, has just removed that bit.
600 women and children from my village, were in 1941 slaughtered and thrown into pits near surmanci, the place were virgin mary is said to have apeared. I wrote abut this -- and rijeca removed that bit. Maby he just doesn't want people knowing about it -- that virgin maty alledgedy apears to some Croats were they cilled Serbs during the genocide.
I've also created a page called Prebilovci Massacre, and because of that, he claims, has removed a great bit of my article on Prebilovci. Among that article, he has removed of what happended in 1991; the bodies of thoose who were massacred in 1941 were blown up by a bomb placed there by Croats.
I just think this is unfair. I see it this way: that's he's missusing his power on wikipedia. Chek it put yourself, then contact me and say what do you think.
Yours Very Thruly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WebsterMasters ( talk • contribs) 15:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Just a note in case you were unaware. I see that you closed the deletion discussion for Nash and redirected it the the book. However, the younger Nash is not mentioned in that article, whereas he is mentioned in the elder Nash article. Given that, wouldn't it make more sense to redirect to the elder Nash article? -- Ramsey2006 16:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your incredibly speedy protection! Wow! I am impressed! Bstone 17:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting my RfA, it closed today with a final tally of 39 supports, 1 oppose and 1 neutral. As always, if you ever see me doing anything which would cause you to regret giving me your support, let me know. henrik• talk 18:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Noted that you went with consensus for a deletion on Six Million, but I think there was one user who had a logical idea - revert it back to what it was (an explanation of the number with a brief mention of the holocaust numbers and (I think) Jewish population). Is there a reason you didn't just do this? -- Dennis The Tiger ( Rawr and stuff) 19:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you so much for suppporting my RfA. I was promoted with a total of (44/1/0) - a vote of confidence from the community that I find humbling and motivating. I will not abuse your trust. Look forward to working with you! ( Esprit15d 21:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC)) |
Hello there! I heard from Runewiki777 that you made an MD5 hash string for him (or helped him). Could you help me on that? Thank you.-- Vintei talk 21:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
-- nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 00:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
See Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira. Carlosguitar 04:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
The Blocking Barnstar | ||
As soon as you got promoted to sysop, I see that you suddenly blocked hundreds of username violation usernames and vandals, every time I patrol special:ipblocklist. For that reason, I am giving you this Blocking Barnstar. NHRHS2010 talk 04:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC) |
Thank you for locking the page, but what, might I ask, do you mean about blocking for 3RR violation? -- G2bambino 05:18, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
...how long are my pages semi-protected? It's because I actually wanted it semi'd for 24 hours because most of the vandalism are coming from registered users. - Go od sh op ed 06:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
The vandal is back with IP 78.111.64.114 . He's again attacking Proof (alcohol).-- Mumia-w-18 06:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Sourly there must be someway we can solve this issue. My sugestion is that we get rid of the Prebilovci Massacre page, bacause the Prebilovci page was created first and what was written about the massacre was written on that page to begin with.
What the user Rijeca did, when he took away the mantion of genocide, was missuse of his power on Wikipedia -- The Free Encyclopedia. He himself is from Croatia, you can see that on his page. He also took away what was written about the atrosities committed in the Bosnien Civil War, when Croats blew up the remains of those who had been massacrd in World War Two -- which was not a genocide according to his oppinion but every one elses.
Make everything how it was before Rijeca came and deleted half the page -- who's clearly done all this because he himself is a Croat.
Not only this, he also deleted the mention of virgin Mary, who in the 1980's is said to have appered to some Croat teenager, at the very same location where they massacred Serbs in World War Two. Thet I think is very relevant to this article. And it is very clear why he did so! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Battlrefielders ( talk • contribs) 10:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your assistance with dealing with this editor. I was hoping it wouldn't come to that, but when he replaied to my edits in such a way, it was clear this person wasn't going to listen to me, and that they were getting intentionally beligerent.
I'm not sure if you checked all of the correspondence I wrote in relation to this, but if you did, I could use the following input: I very much tried to not inflame the situation, and tried not to antagonize this person. If you were to give advice: did I handle this situation the right way, or could you give me advice on how to better handle it in the future? I tried to go through the policies regarding reporting this incident, but being somewhat new to this, I am always looking for advice. Thanks again! LonelyBeacon 14:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes, something is likely to happen there. User:Callmebc has promised to do more 3RR violations on it, but then he stopped talking. We'll just have to see what happens next. ( SEWilco 14:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC))
Hi East718. While I can't argue that the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dove Falconhand was to delete, I note that the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qilué Veladorn resulted in a merge to Seven Sisters (Forgotten Realms). I believe that Dove is at least as notable/well-known as Qilué, and probably more so; I thus believe a merger is more appropriate. As such, I'd like to ask you to userfy the deleted page so I can merge it into Seven Sisters (Forgotten Realms). Thanks in advance! Powers T 16:27, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear East718:
Thanks so much for putting a halt to the madness!
Clearly, we need an authority figure to step in and arbitrate this situation, which has been fueled by conflicts of interest on both sides (yes, I admit it).
I very much want an arbitration to get to an NPOV wiki containing only the facts. And I have tried. That said, other Parties are using Wiki to try to claim that what they are selling is FDA approved. This is entirely false (and the FDA has said as much!). The problem is that these guys are selling this drug everyday, so they have a profound financial incentive to use Wiki as a platform to claim that what they are selling is legitimate. Neither me nor the organization I work for sells ANYTHING. We only want these offenders to tell the truth and abide by the laws governing drug development.
In short, this is the origin of the conflict(s). I wish to help in any way I can in getting to an NPOV wiki.
Thanks,
A —Preceding unsigned comment added by Agincourtboy ( talk • contribs) 22:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, East718 ... you recently deleted some legacy sandboxes for me, but User talk:68.239.79.82/Mensa ( | [[Talk:User talk:68.239.79.82/Mensa|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) has been sitting around ignored from a previous housecleaning a few weeks ago ... would you please zap this one as well? Thnx! — 72.75.79.128 ( talk · contribs) 01:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help and getting NPOV process started again at Lipodissolve. Observed discussions with Agincourtboy but he is part of a smear campaign by a drug company that is trying to make a bundle of money of this same drug they are saying is not safe (till they are approved I guess). Note the links to "lipotreatmentfacts" - an annonymous site and many FDA references that have nothing to do with the procedure as a scare tactic and constant screaming headlines - gets old fast.
Agree many of the people involved (if not all) have a commercial interest - but this debate between the expremes is really undermining what should be a useful reference wiki. Just read through the comments from several doctors on the site to get a sense.
Anything I can do to help let me know,
Chrraymond 03:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Good work East718, will try and keep the quality up. A page I wrote about a CG animator Bernard Edlington from Japan was deleted, actually rightly so by yourself, the comment was something about that a link to IMDB does not warrant Wikipedia entry. I do agree as IMDB is a paid service so I would have liked to include the original film database links from Japan so the external links I have are all in Japanese. Should I rewrite the page with all relevant (verifiable) links? My miss, should I rewrite? Nexusb 12:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello East, I spoke with you the other day about Yamla going out of his way to remove perfectly good license corrections (at the time in regards to Cock Sparrer covers). A bot has requested the same, title corrections on other images... I corrected it, and like clockwork Yamla has trollishly reverted all of the corrections again in an act intented to antagonise and stop the maximisation of Wikipedia, in violation of WP:POINT "bad faith Wikilawyering". As you said you warned him the other day and are familiar with the situation, here are the images he is up to the same tricks on, if you could provide assistance and maybe make the warning a little clearer to him. [1] Regards. - Sirenseven 16:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Responded via email. -- Yamla 16:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in the battle against spammers. TerriersFan 17:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
This user stopped vandalising long before their final warning. TigerShark 20:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm a little puzzled by the block of this user. Reviewing his edits, he appears to have been blocked for removing {prod} templates. But, users are allowed to remove {prod} templates, so I can't figure out what the vandalism is that got this user blocked. I did find one personal attack, but we wouldn't normally block people for one personal attack. Am I missing something? In my opinion, an indefinite block is excessive for a single personal attack, and removing {prod}s isn't an offense at all. Would you consider unblocking, or shortening the duration? - FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 21:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for vote! You're probably the only person who got that. -- EndlessDan 02:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey this template looks familiar :-) its funny I always though you were a admin already, must be because of the quality of your edits, congrats on adminship and take good care of that galleon! - Caribbean~H.Q. 04:05, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for voting at my RfA. Unfortunately, the result stands at 51 support, 21 oppose and 7 neutral which means that I did not succeed. As many expressed their appreciation of my works in featured portals during my RfA, I will fill up the vacuum position of director in featured portal candidates to maintain the standards of featured contents in addition to my active role in Good articles. Have a great day. OhanaUnited Talk page 04:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
The Working Man's Barnstar | ||
For only a short while you have been an admin, and you have done exellent work with the tools. Thanks! Marlith T/ C 04:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks for the protection of my user page. I appreciate the indefinite protection. No reason of any other length of time on user pages. - Rjd0060 04:52, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Wallowing in my RfA: This time it's personal... | ||
My sincere thanks for your support in
my request for adminship, which ended with 51 supports, 0 opposes, and 0 neutral. Doubtless it was an error to put one of the
government-bred race of pigmen in any position of authority, but I hope your confidence in me proves justified.
Even a man pure of heart and who says his prayers at night can become a were-boar when the moon is full and sweet. Fortunately, I'm neither a were-pig nor pure of heart so this doesn't appear to be an imminent danger to Wikipedia for the moment. Fortunate as well because were-pig hooves are hell on keyboards and none too dexterous with computer mice. If ever I should offend, act uncivil, misstep, overstep, annoy, violate policy, or attempt to topple the fascist leadership of Wikipedia, please let me know so I can improve my behaviour and/or my aim.
I am not an animal; I am an admin. And, of course, if there is any way in which I can help you on Wikipedia, please do not hesitate to ask me. Despite my japes, I am indeed dedicated to protecting and serving Wikipedia to the best of my foppish and impudent abilities. I will strive to be an admirable admin, shiny and cool, reasonable and beatific.
Pigman
what?/
trail 05:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
|
Today you unprotected Georgetown, Massachusetts which had previously been protected for edit warring. Would you mind taking a look at the discussion on the talk page there and then review my actions following your unprotection? I removed a large chuck of text that many established Wikipedia editors felt was inappropriate. I have a strong feeling, though, that these questions will be called into question by newer users who instigated this edit war by adding what they felt was notable about their own town to the article. Thanks, Metros 20:34, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
You have nominated a recently successful WP:FL. There have been two recent proposals to begin a List of the Day feature on the main page, which have both received majorities but have not been approved as overwhelming support sufficient to change the main page. WP:LOTDP is a new proposal to try to get the ball rolling based on the original proposal. You can voice your thoughts on its talk page. Basically, what the proposal entails is attempting to run an official trial, and then vote after the trial run on whether to change the main page. Support to run a trial requires much less consensus than support to change the main page. Should we succeed at eventually getting such a feature on the main page it would tentatively look like this. Whether or not you support an experimental trial or not you should come discuss the matter at WP:LOTDP's talk page. I apologize if you have either already voiced your opinion on this matter or already tired of hearing about it.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 21:38, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
I think the Prebilovci Massacre page should be removed. I don't know who acctuallt created it, but since I come from the village of Prebilovci, I know that there isn't anything callaed the Prebilovci Massacre. Not everyone Serb was from that village but from other places as well. Check it out yourself. The Prebilovci Page was also written first, and the context as well. Yours Sincerely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justiceinwiki ( talk • contribs) 12:16, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
The user Rijeca isn't stoping. He's just deleting and i'm forced to make it how it was before every time. He has no right what so ever. First: there is nothing refered to as the Prebilovci Massacre.
I myself come from Prebilovci so I know that. The Serbs hwo were massacred in 1941 at surmanci, where Virgin Mary then alledgely appeared to some Croation teenagers in the 1980's, were not just from Prebilovci. I have never heared anyting refered to as the prebilovci Massacre, maby just someone misunderstood somethin and created the page. Now Rijeca, an user from Crotion, ceeps deleting parts of the Prebilovci page and the part thet talks about the atrosities committed by Croats in 1992; The bodies of thoose who had been massacred were blown to bits by a bomb.
Please, do something. Rijeca is just missusing wikipedia, at least threw my point of view. Try do sort this out somehow beetween me and rijeca. My suggestion is that we get rid of the prebilovci Massacre page, since there's no one exept someone hwo created -- probably missunderstood something about the massacre -- the page! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justiceinwiki ( talk • contribs) 18:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Your unprotection of that Killian documents article did help some. The silent user responded on the Talk page well enough to make a little progress in the discussion. For several reasons he got himself blocked for a month, so we'll see eventually if he has further changes which he can explain. ( SEWilco 03:51, 10 November 2007 (UTC))
Hi! I just need some help with a physics stuff:
1,000 KW (kilowatt) = ? J (joule)
Hope you know this. Thanks.--
Vintei
talk 18:43, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Why dont you mention these [2], [3] which also made move revertion impossible? Is the right to make such moves reserved to the one party only?-- Dojarca 08:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
;-/ O.K. - No prob. Cheers! Claudevsq 03:29, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello East718, I am an editor of the Fellowship of Friends article. Yamla (an admin) stubbed the article and protected it for supposed COI (no vandalism or edit wars going on). Could you take a look to the Talk page? I would like to be sure that Yamla is doing the right job as an admin, since it seems to me he is being a bit to active. Thanks! Love-in-ark 16:38, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Block user:The_JPFidla, please. Thanks. Gscshoyru 02:02, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
No problem, hopefully he'll be running out of sleepers soon. Kesac 02:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
I hate to ask this, but could you please intervene on the West Garden Grove Request for Deletion page? Myself and CelticGreen are having an unproductive arguement, and I was wondering if you could help end it since you were a voter on the request CelticGreen made to ban me from Wikipedia. I would appreciate it if you could do this. Marinidil 03:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi East,
What's the deal with the indefinite block on 230? It's clear the account hasn't made any productive edits, but the user received no warnings and you blocked indefinitely. While blocks are supposed to prevent disruption to the encyclopedia, they're also supposed to start at 24 hours. Will you consider unblocking, or blocking for a shorter period? Firsfron of Ronchester 05:14, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | ||
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page, I have to admit though, excluding the first line, that has to be the most random vandalizing I have ever seen, I mean I started reading it, and I was like "is this a pure copy of
Earth, haha. Well thanks again! Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 07:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC) |
Hey, Congratulations on your RfA. I see you frequently at WP:RFPP. Cool signature, how do you get it to change colours? -- ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 18:59, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
The category you deleted as a C1 speedy ( Category:Mobile phone culture) has been listed at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 November 12 - I'd be grateful if you could comment there. violet/riga (t) 20:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
For (For outstanding contribution to my monobook, your contribution has saved much time for me. I, Mercury, award you this barnstar. You have brought great credit upon yourself, English Wikipedia, and Wikimedia!),
Mercury 21:52, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
FYI... Talk:UFC Fight Night 12. Tuckdogg 02:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey man, thanks for declining that guy's unblock, but it might have been a little hasty on my part. He created some pretty nasty userboxes, including re-creating one after it was deleted at MFD, but other than that, he seemed to be a good-faith editor for the most part. I think some other admins are looking into it, but I wanted to tell you that I appreciate you backing me up. Glass Cobra 02:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Moments after you rejected his block appeal, he left this post in which he promises that he will continue to edit war when he returns and be a disruptive user. -- Scorpion 0422 02:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Hiey can you please not use CSD#G6 when an article has been deleted via AfD please link to summary as it makes it easier for people to understand. Point of not I almost recreated an started another AfD it was only because Hesperian had put "AfD notice" in an edit summary of the article I didnt. Gnan garra 04:11, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I never thanked you for participating in my RfA a couple of weeks ago. Thank you for your support, though unfortunately the request was closed as "no consensus". I plan to run again at a later time, and I hope you will support me again then.
Thanks again! — Remember the dot ( talk) 06:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey, east718! As I just saw on fightnews, they wrote that the WBC have added Manny Pacquiao as emeritus champion in superfeatherweight. But they write that there are also Klitschko, Mayweather, Morales, and 2 or 3 more others. Therefore, I would recommend only to add those to our list that appear on the official WBC website under "Champions", just like Mayweather. Anyway, with six or seven more emeritus champions, you have to admit that then, it would be better to let them out... Cheers! claudevsq 16:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
It has just been confirmed that David Haye isn't champion any longer. He stated in an interview yesterday evening that he would definitely move up to heavyweight, having been offered a good ranking by the WBA, and that he would lay down his belts... claudevsq 19:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I reverted it in fact because I think we should mention them only when the official WBC website mentions them too. It's getting too much otherwise... or put a question on the discussion page to see who is pro/contra. Cheers, claudevsq 19:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
You're right about the Ring mag's title for Haye. My fault! ;-) claudevsq 19:44, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Here's the link, by the way (read beyond the photo):
http://www.laprovence.fr/articles/2007/11/11/153534-FRANCE-Foudroyant-David-Haye.php claudevsq 19:53, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Jim Jagielski. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ⇔ ChristTrekker 23:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Heya, I just closed off that DRV on Jim Jagelski (whatever!). Wanted to let you know that for that kind of ancillary, 'paperwork' request, it's fine for you to close it off yourself once you've dealt with it. There's no conflicts of interest in such a simple thing, and you're not actually making any decision you didn't already make. I've done it anyway, but just for future reference. Splash - tk 23:41, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
...for your participation, criticism, and support in my recent RfA, which succeeded with a final count of 90/1/1. I appreciate all of your kind words, criticism, and suggestions. I extend a special thanks to Acalamari for his nomination, and Dihydrogen Monoxide and Husond for their coaching and nominations. If you need help in any administrative matters, please contact me.
Sorry, didnt release the edit was by an admin until after.
Only did it because your Edit summary "bot is sick" wasn't really relevent to what you were doing. Salavat 06:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm quitting Wikipedia. Please delete all my subpages http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special%3APrefixindex&from=Vintei&namespace=2 and drop down the semi-protection. Thank you. Goodbye.-- Vintei talk 21:47, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
I se he's in the list again as WBA/WBC champion. I think meanwhile that it was maybe indeed a little too early to take him out, even though he said that he would relinquish his belts, he may not yet have done so. I'll change the talk on the discussion page from "Haye vacates belts" to "Haye will relinquish titles to move up"... Cheers! claudevsq 05:37, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
As for the emeritus champions, the WBC published their report yesterday about rankings and mandatories, as you may have seen. It seems uncertain that Pacman stays at superfeatherweight or if he will move up. Let's just wait 2 or 3 more days for the smoke to clear up, 'cause until then, the WBC website will be done updating their rankings 'til October included, and we'll add Pac and Hopkins if they appear in the WBC website's champions list. You know I've never been too much of a friend to emeritus champions, espeially now that there are that much, I simply cannot see why B-Hop is Ring's champ at LHW and emeritus champ at MW, and he doesn't even have a belt and fights maybe once per year, who wants to see him fight anymore anyway? But if they list him, we're gonna list him too. I saw you had him as eme-champ in MW... is that because of his former accomplishments in MW, or why since he's at LHW now, it seems? Too much questions, I know... Let me just handle this, OK? You've got enough other work... ;-))) CHEERS! claudevsq 05:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Just curious how this discussion ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of how the average Wikipedia reader is currently moving) ended in deletion since clearly no " consensus" was reached with a large minority of users calling for clean/merge/rename/userfy with a lot more even split after numerous sources were added? I truly am just curious how this process works. Thanks. Ojh and one more thing, just curious if I could get a copy of the article code especially from the "cells" section as I had some unique sources already worked out for inclusion in either a user page or existing articles which lacked sources for those. I have most of the code saved on my computer but not that section. Thanks for your time. Earthdirt 21:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:LOTD) 01:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Can you point to the consensus to unblock PM? He's had his unblock request rejected, and it's also been rejected on the unblock mailing list. Also I see rather strong support for the block on AN/I. I strongly suggest you reapply the block. Ryan Postlethwaite 02:17, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
East.718,
I am asking you to please remove the litigation note at the bottom of miletich fighting systems and lock the page indefinately. I have been being harrassed for almost a year by a man who has filed lawsuits against many in the sport of mma.
He keeps trying to copyright and trademark logo's for my clothing, and with the use of my name. He was denied on a trademark application already. please help me to control this man's abuse of my name.
Please contact me thru my website at mfselite.com and I can give you all of my attorneys info so they can fill you in.
Thank you, Pat Miletich —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pj miletich ( talk • contribs) 02:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
This IP, which you recently blocked, is the IP for the entire campus wireless network at Caltech. Additionally, I can't seem to find any evidence of a Tor exit node running behind it, but I know that there have been several occasions where it has been banned as one, and so I would greatly appreciate it if you could tell me how you came to that conclusion. Is it on a list somewhere? -- Constantine 10:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
आपने हाल ही में, एक आई पी एड्रेस को ब्लाक किया था : 131.215.220.112. उसे ब्लाक करने का कारन आपने उसका एक ओपन प्रोक्सी होना बताया था, परन्तु ऑनलाइन टूल के मुताबिक, ये ओपन प्रोक्सी नही है. क्या आप बता सकते हैं, आपको क्यों ऐसा लगा की यह टोर प्रोक्सी है? धन्यवाद. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 10:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
I can do it, but I have a couple questions, see that page. MaxSem( Han shot first!) 16:27, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
I mentioned this before, but just to ask again... Could you please remove the date from your signature as it can be somewhat confusing. violet/riga (t) 18:11, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
You may be partially right. Did you see the reply to my question at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Server Lag. I'd not seen the different browsers do that before. Usually they both show the lag. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 19:21, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I recently added a new source to the light heavyweight article about Bernard Hopkins {making 2 total} claiming he was the first middleweight in history to jump 2 divisions and win the light heavyweight title in 1 fight. A feat Sugar Ray Robinsom failed to accomplish. Someone deletes it every time I put it up even though it it sourced from 2 places. The guy is also leaving me messages swearing at me and calling me a fucking retard. I would like this part of the article locked from vandalism and also would like to know how many sources I need before it stays up for good . Thanks in advance, Jason. Ps. Here's what it looks like.
On
June 10,
2006, Hopkins defeated The
Ring Magazine
Light Heavyweight champion and
Roy Jones Jr. conqueror
Antonio Tarver in a completely one-sided fight by a unanimous decision to win Tarver's Light Heavyweight Title. Hopkins knocked Tarver down in Round 5. Hopkins played to the crowd (made up mostly of Hopkins fans) throughout the fight including one moment, in round 10, where Hopkins turned his back to Tarver, raised his arms, and then turned back around and ran after Tarver, hitting him with a flurry of punches before the bell rang. Hopkins stated after the fight that he was "done."
[4] All three judges had him winning the bout 118-109.Hopkins became the first middleweight in history to jump to the light heavyweight division and capture the title in 1 fight. He succeeded where the great Sugar Ray Robinson had failed.<ref>{{cite news | first=bert | last=sugar | coauthors= | title=RECAP: TARVER VS. HOPKINS | date=June 13, 2006 | publisher=hbo | url =http://www.hbo.com/boxing/events/2006/0610_tarver_hopkins/columns/postfight_sugar.html | work =hbo boxing website | pages = | accessdate = 2007-10-07 | language = }}</ref> <ref>{{cite news | first=Ron | last=Borges | coauthors= | title=fighting for history | date=2006-6-8 | publisher= | url =http://www.hbo.com/boxing/events/2006/0610_tarver_hopkins/columns/fighterstory_hopkins.html | work = | pages = | accessdate = 2007-11-16 | language = }}</ref>
—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Xman52 (
talk •
contribs)
<ref>{{cite news | first=dan | last=rapheal | coauthors= | title='Executioner' ruthlessly efficient in final bout | date=2006-6-10 | publisher=espn | url =http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/news/story?id=2478678 | work = | pages = | accessdate = 2007-11-16 | language = }}</ref>
—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Xman52 (
talk •
contribs) Hey, I noticed that your name and status at the top of your page does not cover the original text. If you like, try the code in User:The-G-Unit-Boss/Sandbox as that covers it up. It may not be the case in your browser but I just thought i'd let you know! -- ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 21:39, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Anthony Robbins is again making personal attacks on me after your final warning. He is doing this on the talk page of the bernard hopkins article. I would like him banned for repeated personal attacks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xman52 ( talk • contribs)
Matt arroyo and richie hightower are on team hughes because on the newer episode they were swithched to the opppsite team for rebalancing... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsmacko ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for blocking the user above. I was about to make an AIV report, actually. It's probably obvious to you, but the user contested their block, asserting that the edits they made to the Twinkle page were good faith; the unblock was declined by Sandstein. The block expires in 24 hours, though, and I have a hunch that the user will bounce right back. I probably won't be back online, but I'm guessing you've got them on your watchlist so the block can be reinstated ASAP in the event of post-release vandalism? Tuvok T @ lk/ Improve me] 09:00, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Your most recent edit to that article apparently restored the vandalism that led to its blocking in the first place. Would you mind removing that? Just64helpin ( talk) 12:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, It's xman52 again. Anthony Robbins is back and again attacking me personally and swearing on the bottom of the Talk page of Bernard Hopkins. I've taken to your warnings and have been doing the right thing by not replying. I've stated my arguements and listed sources when needed top back them up without personal attacks. Please ban Anthonny Robbins again to stop these personal attacks against me. Xman52 ( talk) 16:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Well, on Tuf 2 episode 8, Team Franklins heavyweights were beating all of Team Hughes' heavyweights to a point where Franklin had to transfer Brad Imes to Team Hughes, and at the finale, Imes was considered Team Hughes' heavyweight because of the change... but maybe its only that one fight due to them might actually fighting their teamate again in the semi-finals... take care... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsmacko ( talk • contribs)
I don't want to be a pain but this guy Anthony Robbins is constantly swearing at and insulting me. Can you do something as soon as you get a chance please? I shouldn't have to put up with this. Thank's in advance, Xman52. Xman52 ( talk) 22:15, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi - I wanted you to know that I have semi-protected this page, because I disagree with your reasoning that there is insufficient activity to justify protection. I tend to be REALLY gun-shy with BLP issues, and there were a series of pretty egregious BLP issues by IPs - enough to make me nervous anyway. I hope you don't mind, and please feel free to revert if you seriously disagree. - Philippe | Talk 00:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
xman52 is vandalising both the main & talk page with his biased nonsense. He's nothing more than an ignorant Hopkins cheerleader. Don't let him edit any pages or edit them for him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.242.89 ( talk)
Good man. I wasn't quite sure about salting. I will revise now, however. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry ( talk)
A content dispute would require two sides arguing. The anonymous doesn't discuss at all, simply reverts. What should I do next? I don't want to engage in a revert war but the edits are ghastly. JuJube ( talk) 02:30, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Why is the Main Page on there? – Gurch 13:08, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Oh dear. I am tripping up all over the place, it seems! I was getting confused between blocking for 'spam' and blocking for an inappropriate username... Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry ( talk) 23:34, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
"Speedy deleted per (CSD I7), was an image with an invalid fair use rationale and the uploader was notified more than 48 hours ago." That's funny because I wasn't notified at all. Also, what was wrong with the fair-use rationale?-- Svetovid ( talk) 00:09, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
For one, I'm sick of people deleting my articles. I do not advertise just simply inform. Your the kind of people that make me sick because they cant do their jobs right. Enough said. Frankythedoggy ( talk) 00:12, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you, but could you restore my userspace (is it possible)? Wikipedia is just too much an addiction to me. Thanks man! -- Vintei talk 01:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
I have an approved sock that I was going to use. If you nuke the userspace, will it erase all record of the linkage between the two accounts? I made no big deal of it, and was in contact with only one admin when I created it, so no one should know it is me, unless I tell them. And what is the RTV policy on that? It's okay to tell wikifriends I trust what name I'm under now, correct? K. Scott Bailey ( talk) 04:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for acting on my request. The version that's up now is the one that they reverted out all of all of my contributions. I guess I don't understand. If I had reverted it again and made the request wouldn't I have been in violation of the 3RR?. I didn't know how to make clear I was requesting protection of a prior version. Now it's just the way it was when all this started. this is just very discouraging even though I guess it's part of participating. Awotter ( talk) 00:36, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
User was blocked for 3RR edit warring and repeated disruption. If you like trolls, good lick. I will not hesitate top block him again whet he resumes disruption. Your wheel warring without looking into the matter is poor judgement of wikilawyering. Your opinion that it is better to protect an article and halt to grind productive work of many other editors than to block a pesky disruptor is a rather poor judgement. `' Míkka >t 01:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Anthony Robbins is back again. He's insulting me and swearing even worse then before. Can you please do something about this? He is making the conflict very difficult to resolve. Thanks. Xman52 ( talk) 01:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
I notice you recently deleted this article... I don't particularly agree, but understand the reasoning behind it... as a major contributor though I was wondering if it would be possible to get a copy of the last version of the article before it was deleted. Thanks. -- Selquest ( talk) 02:46, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Why did you revert my speedy nomination of Doong Spank? If you are declining the nomination, please at least state a reason. The article contains no prose at all, just a list of songs. I think A1 easily applies. Reverting me just makes it look like I'm vandalising or something. -- Bloodzombie ( talk) 04:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
I could have sworn I put a speedy on this, and that you then deleted it: no refs, no notability. Was I dreaming, or is this a recreation? I confuse easily. Thanks Bielle ( talk) 05:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. - Jehochman Talk — Preceding undated comment added 00:58, November 20, 2007 (UTC)
The Invisible Barnstar | ||
For being with us for so many years, and for many years to come, raise a glass. Marlith T/ C 05:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC) |
Did you remove the date so it won't get archived? Why shouldn't it? If I understand the bot correctly, it needs two sigs to know what to archive, anyway. — Sebastian 07:16, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I have entered the Mega AS Consulting information yesterday.
The information that was there before, was also entered by me. That in formation, as stated is relevant and factual about an innovative company and technology, same as other companies in that industry.
Unknown to me, another Administrator has decided to remove the same entry. Since I did not know about it, I did not have a chance to respond to his allegations and that abuse of administrator power has caused me real harm as it hurt my credibility which is an asset.
I have no idea who User:STLMatt is. He does not work for Mega AS. What ever he has done is his own responsibility and I have no clue about it. It has nothing to do AT ALL with Mega AS Consulting Ltd and thus the value of the entry should be on the face of it and NOT on someone else's actions.
Once I discovered (yesterday) that the company was removed I created it again, as before, in the same format as other companies in the same industry.
I believe I'm correct in saying that there is no Spam in this removed page, just facts about an interesting company with innovative technology. That technology is different enough to be interesting to many people who are looking for alternative. If you agree that other companies, in the same industry have the right to their entry, then the same should apply to Mega AS Consulting Ltd.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Regards,
Arnnei —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arnneisp1 ( talk • contribs) 11:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
You don't believe that this is advertising, perhaps you would say why? Paste ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 19:49, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
I used Twinkle to report a user to an administrator's noticeboard, and you blocked the user! Many thanks go out to you. Dalekusa 22:11, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
If message something like I posted do not remain there, other users will get confused, report it on WP:ANI and cycle will continue. sharara 22:40, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
I award you this barnstar for being the most active admin at WP:RPP!-- Phoenix-wiki ( talk · contribs) 23:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC) |
For posting the content. -- ALLSTAR ECHO 23:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
lol ;) -- Oxymoron 83 02:46, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, I saw you had taken an interest in the Gründerzeit article which was recently up for deletion. I have translated most of the original article (it has since been revised in the original, but there we go ....) and it seems to be better. Would you cast an eye over it and let me know if you think it is up to scratch? I do think it deserves a place in the encyclopaedia. Many thanks. docboat ( talk) 04:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I've published my monobook now so that you can easily add importScript('User:DerHexer/monobook.js');
. Regards, —
DerHexer
(Talk) 21:08, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
For the sake of neutrality, I'm going to ask you to do it but I wonder if you think User:Funguszeppelin deserves to have his 24-hour block extended. I can't imagine he'll be more productive when his block is done. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 05:29, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
It appears I semi'd the article, and got edit conflicted when posting {{
RFPP|s}}
to see that you declined the request ;) Feel free to undo the protection if you really felt it was uneccessary.
Spebi 06:43, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Heya - I'm the one who keeps trying to uplaod that photo of Jon Coffelt - I have permission to use it, but I'm obviously doing something wrong. What do I have to do to not have it deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathaniels ( talk • contribs) 08:54, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
I noticed on WP:RPP that User talk:Funguszeppelin was protected by you for TWENTY YEARS. Surely one year would have been a more appropriate amount of time? 20 years just seems like an incredibly long amount of time to protect a page for... what was the thinking behind that? I'm just curious.-- h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 10:52, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
FYI: Skippykiller ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) -- I tagged this username to WP:UAA. since the username itself appears to be an extension of the attack page ( Image:Skippie.jpg). -- Ssbohio ( talk) 12:40, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
1.FM is a free internet radio network broadcast by the Energy Group Radio LLC [5], with currently 29 different music channels from club to classics. The radio channels are available for real-time streaming over the Internet.
In October 2006, Andomedia ranked the 1.fm network as #2 on its Webcast Metrics ratings. For that month 1.fm had an Average Quarter Hour listenership of nearly 20,000 concurrent listeners, more than ABC Radio & ESPN Radio [6] -- Tboogie937 ( talk) 13:51, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
... have answers :)
They're here. Please read them and let me know if you have any follow-on questions, either on that page or privately as you wish.
Best,
FT2 (
Talk |
email) 01:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
Thanks for helping out with the image backlog today. It is very appreciated, since I have many less images to nuke tonight. Thanks again, Maxim 01:37, 23 November 2007 (UTC) |
Lordvader2009 keeps removing the AfD link for this page while the discussion is still ongoing. I've warned him about it a couple of times, but he just blanks his talk page and does it again without addressing the problem. The last time, right after he blanked his talk page an anon user made the same deletion from the UFC Fight Night 12 page, which I'd suspect was him. This is getting irritating; anything an admin can do to help out here? Tuckdogg ( talk) 05:38, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey there. Recently at ANI, I noticed your signature includes the timestamp within a box. May I ask how you do that? I tried including {{ CURRENTDATE}} etc and signing with three tildes, but SineBot came after me... I dorftrottel I talk I 07:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
What the heck is GP? Could you possibly reblock this user under a better edit summary? He's requesting unblock, and it's kind of hard to determine if the block was proper without knowing what it was talking about in the first place. The Evil Spartan ( talk) 07:00, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
This was going to get ugly if not closed tomorrow. BTW, what does the red "e" on delete stand for? Miranda 07:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
I don't mind saying that I agree that the current state of the article provides the necessary context to warrant a tag to expand. Perhaps you didn't observe the state of the article when I nominated for speedy deletion? It was a single line, with no templates. I'm a bit offended that you call my nomination abusive. If you disagree, I'd like to discuss it. Otherwise, please be more considerate. Bsherr ( talk) 09:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
You've deleted the picture of John Chapman that I added to his profile. Did I do something wrong? I have permission to submit the picture - he has asked me to add him to Wiki. I'm new to wiki :o) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stegboy ( talk • contribs)
This was never resolved, yet you took it down. Collectonian and one other person decided that it was "interpretation", "rumor", etc. and I challenged them to show me what was interpretation; they stop responding (except to reiterate the baseless claim); yet they win the dispute by default? Collectonian's whole premise was that it was "not notable", and even you said it was notable! (And I noticed a lot of people started complaining about his deletions in other subjects in one day!)
I don't know what other type of sources they want for that, then. It was a lyrical battle; not a real life personal beef, and this article was really no different than any of the others on hip hop rivalries (e.g. they all use the same sort of references. That is they type of info you find for rap history).And yes, please restore to my space. Eric B ( talk) 14:34, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
why is it that now my second attempt at creating a page is being attempted to be messed up by someone as well!
why did you delete my article on 'GHD'?! Do you not realise it is the largest hair iron brand in the UK?!
Iamandrewrice ( talk) 14:59, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you... but why is it up for speedy deletion? Oo
x Iamandrewrice ( talk) 15:07, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
I think this article went too soon. This is genuinely a prominent Dutch law firm, of the same standing as those law firms that have existing articles, even if it needed rewriting for tone. Please can you undelete it so that at least it gets a chance to be considered at AfD? HeartofaDog ( talk) 15:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for speedy deleting Hybrid per G6 per my request. However, I also meant to have Talk:Hybrid deleted. I didn't know I should have asked for this seperately. Now I've moved Hybrid (disambiguation) to Hybrid, but Talk:Hybrid (disambiguation) got left behind. i'm no computer whiz, and I don't know how to fix this at this point. Can you help again?-- Yannick ( talk) 16:24, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi! Um, do you know how to build a bot? Thanks!-- Vintei talk 17:24, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
I am confused, how can a cartoon dog from family guy create a biography of himself but i can not create a page about modern artwork? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bezartan ( talk • contribs) 17:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Do you actually know what the purpose of Template:Did you know/Next update/Time is? Apparently based on your previous edits to this page, I do not get a sense you do. It is to remind people when was the last time that the DYK main page template has been updated, so it can be changed after six hours with a list of new articles.
Therefore, please do not reset the clock unless the DYK have been updated. I noticed that you reset the clock at 12:04, 24 November 2007 (UTC) [8] when the DYK main page template was not changed. Therefore, the list put on at 03:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC) [9] was on the main page for longer than it should have. [10] Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 19:19, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
He saying that i should not do DAYS soaps. can you talk to him on his discussion for me? Car5ly858 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Car5ly858 ( talk • contribs) 00:47, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
East, what is the reason for this protection?. the_undertow talk 06:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Since you fixed the page, does that mean it won't be deleted? -- Cammyzcool ( talk) 07:41, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks :) -- Anonymous Dissident Talk 08:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you deleted the images from articles Edwin Valero, Bobby Pacquiao and Z Gorres. Aren't the reasons I gave in the dispute convincing enough? Duke17 ( talk) 09:49, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Awfully sorry to bother you, but could you explain why you thought the Taslima Nasreen article didn't need semi-protection? Relata refero ( talk) 10:18, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Could you explain why you deleted the British Worker front cover image on the Solidarity UK page? I designed the cover and therefore have copyright. Doublethink64 ( talk) 12:08, 25 November 2007 (UTC)doublethink64
Didn't realize that was you that left a message, thought it was the vandal. Anyways, can you help me with this User name:Briancutajar ? I used the wrong template on their talk page as it was supposed to be a further warning. Anyways its been removed. Grande13 ( talk) 15:07, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Durova and Jehochman/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Durova and Jehochman/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Cbrown1023 talk 18:31, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the unblock! My edit count was 666, and didn't want it to stay that way for 31 hrs!!
Once again...thanks!,
L337p4wn ( talk) 04:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
User:Scaleneed, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Scaleneed and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Scaleneed during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Marlith T/ C 05:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps this diff will give you reason to extend the 3 day block to indef? Obvious sock, as he's been harassing the user every day for at least a week from different IP's. - Rjd0060 ( talk) 06:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
What on earth does this [11] mean? And doesn't something like this call for some sort of notification? What's the deal? (Please reply under the appropriate subhead on my talk page. Thanks.) deeceevoice ( talk) 16:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Why did you remove the image of Brand New off the page? I gave a reason that it can be used for Wikipedia under fair use. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericstrategy ( talk • contribs) 18:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
I have permission from the actress/writer/director/producer to create/edit information about her and can forward her email to me so that you know that the information I had put up was with permission and I have copyright permission to distribute to Wikipedia. I was told that was the reason why the information I had put up previously had been deleted, thinking it was copyright information I didn't have permission to distribute/publish? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spfoley ( talk • contribs) 19:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
hello, there was this girl who yelled at me for taking the DAYS OF OUR LIVES cast box out of a link and put it on the main page. I only did that because it was easier to view and that was how it was for the longest time until about this summer and i like it better the other way and im sure a lot of other people do. and she is being wiked jerky and needs to leave everyone alone because she is being mean about what ever people edit and i don't like it.
CelticGreen <<that is her username
please get her like revoked..thank you for listening —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drnorth16 ( talk • contribs) 23:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
I dont feel you give "Sophia "Sonya" Esman" enough credit. She has a very bright future and was recently accepted by a record compan, please put back the page. I would really appreicate it. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hollerbird ( talk • contribs) 01:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello East718. TharkunColl has thrown in the towel; Though I think the page should remain 'protected' for awhile -- would you move it back to the consensus preferred Monarchy of the United Kingdom? Thanks. GoodDay ( talk) 01:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
I would give you a barnstar for being especially helpful in my first fortnight as an administrator. However, you only got one four days ago, so you can wait a bit long. In the meantime, have a tiny picture of where I work, to keep you warm in the wee hours. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry ( talk) 01:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for closing this AfD: I was pitying the poor admin who was going to have to close it! One thing: there were four articles co-nominated (three forks of County Durham, plus a redirect), but you only deleted one of them. Can you fix this please..... -- RFBailey ( talk) 02:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
you had deleted my article on david gonzales. i felt that it was unnecessary due to the fact that the article is relevant and contributes greatly to wikipedia. for example there are many articles that are about professional skateboarders like Andrew Reynolds and Dustin Dollin, so why not David Gonzales? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samhasim ( talk • contribs) 04:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Good evening,
I was wondering why my article on AudioStreet.net was deleted? I setup a page describing the services the site offers and what is it about. I was given a notice that it was a blatant advertisement. How can I describe a site without it sounding like an advertisement?
AudioStreet.net is mentioned a few times in Wiki articles. Do I have to just limit to say "Free music hosting service & music community?" with nothing more?
Thank you, Joe —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zmanchu ( talk • contribs) 04:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Okay, so as strange as it may sound, i think that an edit is not showing up in the edit history. If you go to my userpage you will see that it says "die" on it (i know who did it, because they wrote the same thing on the talk page), but the odd thing is it is not showing any recent edits in edit history. If you look way back there is no edit where the word "die" is added to my userpage. Also a template has been removed. Have i gone mad? Tiptoety ( talk) 06:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Could you clarify your reasons for determining a consensus of "delete"? - jc37 09:35, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
The Cheryl Bentov article was developed over 2-3 years with dozens of edits by a half-dozen editors. To delete it after a non-debate scheduled during American Thanksgiving is ill-considered at best. It seems to me you should have contacted some of the editors of the article so they could weigh in, or at least have waited for the holiday to be over. Moreover, rather than deleting the article, which is appropriate only if the article is useless, you should have changed it to a redirect so that your (again, ill-considered) actions could be undone.
I restored the article before I realized that you had actually deleted the article on purpose. If you truly believe that the data in the Bentov article fits better in the Mordechai Vanunu article, then you should move it into that article. But removing valuable information from Wikipedia that fits nowhere else, about a legitimate subject with multiple extant newspaper articles online with her as the main subject, is... heck, let's call a spade a spade: boneheaded.
As I mentioned in Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Cheryl_Bentov, the rationale for deleting the Bentov article could be used to delete the Seung-Hui Cho article, since he is "only" famous for the Virginia Tech massacre.
- Rjyanco ( talk) 14:58, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Yeap, I'm watching the contribution log. There were two unblock requests that came in at the same time and one was created a few weeks back. I'll keep my eyes open. -- Yamla ( talk) 15:58, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
I was wondering why the page "Lizz Robbins" was deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knicksfan4ever ( talk • contribs) 17:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Lizz_Robbins. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Knicksfan4ever ( talk • contribs) 20:15, 27 November 2007
well i am just trying to do something for my school okay so i am just trying to get an A. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bdub123 ( talk • contribs) 19:58, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello my name is Walter Melon i am doing a research project and was wondering if you could please leave your name and age that would be greatly appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bdub123 ( talk • contribs) 20:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Why was the above article deleted? Lex T/ C Guest Book 04:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Do you think you could up this to a full protection? It's actually autoconfirmed editors who make edits like this. Or do I need to do it formally? I (talk) 04:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Please remove
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Rugby_Club for the same reasons
Please remove
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnaby_Lake_Rugby_Club for the same reasons —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Meraloma (
talk •
contribs) 04:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Wait wait wait wait. What happened the the dispute I put there? What happened to the discussion over the image? What happened to some sort of discussion before it was deleted? The free image was not a replacement for the fair use one. It was a completely different subject. If you disagreed, or thought it didn't conform with policy, or something like that, then you should have just said something to me, rather than deleting it. - Silent Wind of Doom ( talk) 04:33, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I would like to know why you removed the entry I made to the Administrator Intervention Against Vandalism. The user has on numerous occasions inserted uncited and likely false information regarding unaired episodes of several reality shows, has ignored final warnings (and also erased them from his/her talk page) and has also been blocked once before for the same behaviour. To my mind, that constitutes obvious vandalism. ... discospinster talk 04:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Can you tell me if Talk:Houston Voice had the LGBT project banner on it? Just curious because my bot should have noticed that it was prodded and it didn't. Many thanks! -- SatyrTN ( talk | contribs) 05:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I've noticed you clean-up links to articles you delete, thanks! One quick thing though you have sometimes just the link from and left the text from articles listed in 'see also' sections or the List of martial arts when the whole entry should be removed, hope this helps -- Nate1481( t/ c) 10:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I am writing to inform my displeasure of you deleting 'timmyland'. The japanese theme park. It is a real place, so why delete it? Get your facts right, and double check before deleting something. -- Dantheman555 ( talk) 13:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
East, is the image I added to Paper Tapes here appropriately tagged? I don't think I've gotten the hang of doing that, yet. It's hard, to me, because there is {{Non-free album cover}} AND {{Non-free use rationale}}, and my brain tells me that I should really only need one of them at a time. Thanks. — Scouter Sig 16:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Thanks for your swift response to RS1900's harassment on my talk page. The efficiency with which this problem was addressed astoundes me, and I am grateful for the efforts that you and others took to deal with this. Again, thank you. Nick Graves ( talk) 17:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Excuse me? [12]. The self made pic Image:Teutonic takeover.PNG you defend is used at Pomerelia to push away the sourced map Image:Pommerellen.png by edit warring. Please explain your stance, and use of words. -- Matthead DisOuß 18:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Hiya. You deleted Sernpidalians after closing this AFD, but not Myrkr strike team, which was also nominated on that page. -- EEMIV ( talk) 19:26, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
WHY AM I HAVING TO WRITE AGAIN? SOPHIA "SONYA" ESMAN IS A VERY FAMOUS HUMAN BEING. YOU REALLY SHOULD BE BANNED FROM WIKIPEDIA, SINCE YOU DELETED 5 HOURS OF INTERVEIWING AND WRITING.. WHY DIDNT YOU RESPOND??!! I THINK YOU ARE THE WORST PERSON EVER. DELETING TIMMYLAND.. HE'S RIGHT, GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT MISTER!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hollerbird ( talk • contribs) 01:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey East, thanks for blocking the 67.55.6.0/24 range. You can see all the throwaway IPs at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/IP check#Europebound2007. I wish I knew more about range blocks to deal with this stuff. Spellcast ( talk) 03:36, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Also, I don't know if you can help out here but I've been encountering another bounce hopping IP. Check out the block log of User:Extraordinary Machine and you'll see all these disruptive IPs from Israel. If you can help out there, that'd be great. Otherwise, an abuse report or check user will probably be filed. Spellcast ( talk) 03:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi East718, you responded to my request at WP:RFPP for semi protection on this article stating the IP was blocked. But blocking an IP doesn't address the issue on the Google Pack page since the poster is IP hoping and has returned again [13]. Any chance you could semi the page for a short time? I find this frequently gets spammers to give up and find some other website to abuse. Thanks. -- SiobhanHansa 04:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Why did you delete that article it was 100% correct my grandfather Jim ( Dimitrious ) Rally was co-founder of the team with is brother John. If you don't believe me look it up for yourself. Look up the Lamar Hunt tournament and you will see they won it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.141.241.127 ( talk) 06:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
User:Space Cadet has agreed to work on the place names in the maps; I don't see any need for deletion at this time.— Random832 16:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Speedy delete the original research image
Image:Teutonic_takeover.PNG is used in edit wars at
Teutonic takeover of Danzig (Gdańsk),
History of Gdańsk (Danzig),
Pomerelia in order to supersede the proper sourced map
Image:Pommerellen.png. It is part of a compaingn by some Poles to deny the 600y years of history of
Danzig. They also make an attempt to rally a posse to overthrow the results of the Gdansk/Danzig vote, see also
Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_November_30#Template:Gdansk-Vote-Results. --
Matthead
DisOuß 14:54, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Since you're also a member of the WikiProject Boxing, I'd like to tell you something. In some media, I noticed for some time that the height of a person in metric terms is usually measured in centimeters (cm) not meters. Perhaps this is because meters are too long and less accurate. Thus, I suggest this should apply to those boxing biographies here that currently using meters for metric height. Do you agree? FoxLad ( talk) 22:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi! You're the only Admin I know so uh, how do I get into an IRC channel? IE or Firefox can't open the protocol and I can't seem to find an answer. Could you help me? Thank you very much!-- Vintei talk 02:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
I have not violated the 3RR rule, that is why I was not blocked.— Christopher Mann McKay talk 07:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC)