Hi EBY3221. Thanks for your feedback earlier on this page. I've taken your advice regarding fixing the first sentence but am wondering if you can expand on your comments regarding the ref formatting - what specifically needs improvement?

/info/en/?search=Draft:Alexander_Kemper

Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterJohnson22 ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi EBY3221,

Thanks for your timely review and response.

As per your suggestions I have made the following changes on the page:

1. Citation - 7 new citation including citations from leading newspapers like Times of India (Owned Bennett & Coleman). 2. Increased Content in Introduction 3. Images are cropped according to specifications 4. Right side column information updated

Also I have a large database of Hard copy of articles in leading newspapers and magazines, is there anyway I could submit them as well?

I would be glad if you could review the page and let me know of any other changes that has to be done before submission. Link : /info/en/?search=Draft:Yash_Aradhya

Thanks for your help. Khizer91 ( talk) 09:03, 2 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khizer91 ( talk • contribs) 12:16, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi EBY3221. Wondering if you could give a quick review to this page, as it is very brief. Many thanks in advance. /info/en/?search=Draft:Alexander_Kemper

I edited the Ronnie Dell entry with facetious stuff because I am convinced he exists only fictionally in the play/film "Grease." I'll leave it to wiki wonks to make a "constructive" correction. The contents of the Ronnie Dell entry are absurd. The cited references do not exist. I abdicate my self-appointed duty to protest nonsense with more over-the-top nonsense. Thank you for being serious about keeping Wikipedia serious. (I mean that without sarcasm; writing cannot carry my true tone.) I value Wikipedia as a resource. Thanks again.

I am certain your recent post to my talk page was not intended to express a certain amount of hubris on your part, so I'll presume you mean this with all good intentions. Kindly focus your constructive edits, not the long history we've had with going back and forth on deletions of my work. I'm open to hearing an opinion, I don't assert or presume ownership of any Wikipedia page. That's a comment out of left field. I'll restore the content and provide appropriate citation as you've got a real stickler on this subject of my work and for some reason you're focused on removing all the hard work that I do. Why? I don't know. I will presume there is some reason or agenda that I'm unaware of...but in the meantime, please know that I am within my rights as you are to post content and edit it.

Borntodeal ( talk)

Avaya is head quartered in CA, it is a fact: http://www.avaya.com/usa/documents/mis20771210.pdf

I suggest you check the facts before you revert other peoples edits.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sam Brownback. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 27 September 2014 (UTC) reply

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dado Pršo. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC) reply

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nofel Izz. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC) reply

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Steve Daines. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Victor Drai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 25 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Did you mean to put the comment on the AfD page rather than the talk page? Peter Rehse ( talk) 15:16, 28 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Yep. Thanks. EBY ( talk) 15:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC) reply

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:George Clooney. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Brian Thompson

added links pointing to Action adventure, Blockbuster, Knight Rider and The Expendables

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:00, 1 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your review. Could you also fill in the B-class parameter of other templates there? Thanks, -- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:25, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus - Done. Cheers, EBY ( talk) 04:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply

You did the right thing to list it, and even better to admit a mistake (so few do). Don't worry, it's sorted. Your humble gnome, Si Trew ( talk) 23:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC) reply

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Anita Sarkeesian. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 6 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hansen Medical, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 16:50, 8 November 2014 (UTC) reply

I deleted your citation that referenced a self-published book because I don't believe that it qualified as a reliable source. [I'm about to raise the question at WP:citing sources talk page.
However I also wrote 'possible conflict of interest' which, given your editing history, is most unlikely. Therefore I withdraw and apologise for that remark. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 23:29, 12 November 2014 (UTC) reply

@ John Maynard Friedman: I appreciate that. EBY ( talk) 00:44, 13 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Just for completion, my attention has been drawn to WP:SELFPUBLISH, which is the relevant policy here. If the author of the self-published book is notable, then you should undo my deletion. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 23:33, 15 November 2014 (UTC) reply

@ John Maynard Friedman: I was just flying through and didn't double check if it was self-published (It was from Amazon, from another thing I was researching.) I will say that Probate article is egregiously written and looks like a "WikiHow" instruction. Appreciate the catch. And the comment. EBY ( talk) 00:54, 16 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Yes, I agree - it needs the attention of an expert - or even a good editor: your little clean-up was just the sort of tonic it needs a lot more of. It also has a history of spam links, which is why I was so trigger happy. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 23:00, 16 November 2014 (UTC) reply

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:John Wood (Room to Read). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 14 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello EBY3221. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC). reply

       Sent via-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• Ndidi Okonkwo Nwuneli ( talk · contribs)
  • User:Ndidi Okonkwo Nwuneli ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, thanks for reviewing my page. I realize that the page has been deleted but I had been trying to get approval for this page close to six months now, I must confess it has taken much longer than I anticipated and unsure about the copyrighted information in the last draft. I need your advice and assistance to get the next submission to meet all terms and conditions for approval. Thank you in advance}}

Ndidi Okonkwo Nwuneli ( talk) 09:42, 19 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your review of Draft:Richard Banks (banker). I have added some more recent information as requested - would you mind having a look now and seeing whether it is ok to be moved into the main workspace? Many thanks AndrewRT( Talk) 21:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Many thanks AndrewRT( Talk) 21:54, 19 November 2014 (UTC) reply

AndrewRT No problem. EBY ( talk) 05:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Place2Be, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BT, Charity and Royal patronage. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• Ndidi Okonkwo Nwuneli ( talk · contribs)
  • User:Ndidi Okonkwo Nwuneli ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you so much for writing back EBY. Fact is, the profile being created is different from the creator(being me), which I realised too late it will appear as conflict of interest. I went with the name of the profile to avoid confusion when its eventually approved. I am new at writing profiles on wiki and probably have not sufficiently mastered the art. I am learning from this experience and hope to become an editor as well(thanks for sharing the link to editing other pages). 

I might write again if I am encounter problems either requesting an article or otherwise.

Thank you, you have really been helpful.

Ndidi Okonkwo Nwuneli ( talk) 18:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Ndidi Okonkwo Nwuneli You're welcome, good luck. EBY ( talk) 19:02, 20 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello,

Just would like some more clarification about why you have flagged the post for deletion. I have been over the 'Biographies of living people' section, and purposely left out most personal information regarding Dr. Watling. The information I have provided has mostly (22/25 references) been edited and published in peer review scientific journals.

Thanks

02:16, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi EBY, I'm a little concerned that you might be moving too quickly with your deletion nominations, and making some errors in the process. For example, Division of Afghanistan isn't a great article, but it doesn't qualify as A1 - that criterion is specifically limited to cases where you can't tell what the article is about, which wasn't the case here. Similarly, Milly Shapiro was a poorly sourced BLP, but it wasn't spam - indeed, most actor bios we have begin with some variation on "X is an actor best known for the role Y". I would also question some of your AFD nominations. Could you reconsider your approach to deletion tagging, and review the associated criteria? Thanks, Nikkimaria ( talk) 16:28, 21 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Nikkimaria - Thanks for the note. I will say that those actor articles, when they went live, were not sourced and neither actor is over 10 years old. The same new editor made a few of those all at once, it certainly looked like a pattern that overcame WP:AGF. The other article is (a) an essay about (b) something that is not real. There is no current plan within the country to split the country into further divisions. I will nominate it for deletion again unless a source that backs up the claim is submitted. And, frankly, if there is such a plan it then information about it probably should start as part of the TWO current Wikipedia articles about the Subdivisions of Afghanistan and the Provinces of Afghanistan. We disagree what meets criteria, and I can certainly do better at understanding what fits in what boxes, but I appreciate you saying so civilly. EBY ( talk) 21:37, 21 November 2014 (UTC) reply

I think you could make cogent arguments to delete both articles, actually, but the arguments you chose were not the right ones, and probably the way to do that would be either PROD or AFD rather than CSD. That being said, the potential division of Afghanistan is discussed in the literature - see for example this source - so I wouldn't say it isn't real, even if it doesn't end up happening and even if it doesn't merit an independent article at this time. Cheers, Nikkimaria ( talk) 00:42, 22 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Nikkimaria Nope. There is no current plan to further divide Afghanistan, as the essay tense presumes. 2 years ago, some countries pitched some ideas but none on the basis of language. So it is an essay of an article that asserts, with tense, something not true and contains, outright, unsourced and untrue information. I looked at each of those sources before hitting delete and found the essay, as written, to be not only false but possibly politically inflammatory. Not sure if it was original thought, opinion, soapbox, or hoax - definitely WP:FORUM. If the situations were reversed and there was an essay put into Wikipedia article space stating that England was possibly being newly subdivided based on what kind of accent was spoken, based on an Afghani opinion piece from two years ago, how long would that survive? AfD instead of speedily delete, sure. This article? Nope. EBY ( talk) 01:04, 22 November 2014 (UTC) reply

As I said, I think an argument other than A1 could support deletion. By the way, [[Ping|Nikkimaria]] will not result in a notification; try {{ping|Nikkimaria}}. Cheers, Nikkimaria ( talk) 16:24, 22 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Bah. I long ago lamented that errors don't pay. I'd be rich if they did for the amount of times I've inverted brackets, spaces, pipes, colons, etc. I'm old school, type everything longhand and still make the same errors 8 years in. There have to be dinosaurs, so here I am. EBY ( talk) 16:31, 22 November 2014 (UTC) reply

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mark Begich. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC) reply

I added some references to Randy Lennox and removed the excessively promotional text. You may want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Lennox. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 02:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC) reply

I started a page move request; join in. -- George Ho ( talk) 18:27, 23 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your contribution to this new article! Please let me know if I may be of assistance. Djbaniel ( talk) 07:17, 25 November 2014 (UTC) reply

After careful consideration, can you please elaborate on your use of the notability/neologisms tag? Please see my edit summary when I created the article. Djbaniel ( talk) 07:30, 25 November 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Djbaniel: - responded on article's talk page. Best of luck, EBY ( talk) 07:42, 25 November 2014 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Use of Force Doctrine in Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Use of Force Doctrine in Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –  JBarta ( talk) 11:55, 26 November 2014 (UTC) reply

I see you have made several entirely valid comments when reviewing drafts, but have not declined the drafts. There is, of course, nothing wrong with this, since it leaves the draft in place in the queue. However, several days later there has been no action by the author.

If we did not have so many old drafts and a backlog I would be in 100% agreement with your approach. Since we have a backlog, may I suggest you consider a more rigid approach and decline those which really do not pass muster, leaving only the borderline ones with a simple comment? Indeed, with the borderline ones, consider accepting them, flagging the deficiencies, and letting the community decide. Fiddle Faddle 11:22, 27 November 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Timtrent: - this was a case of "I've declined 100 articles in the last week and I just wanted to give a few a chance." Just fatigue from the bloodletting of AfC work. I'll get the scythe back out. EBY ( talk) 14:08, 27 November 2014 (UTC) reply

I so know what you mean. When I get fatigued I just walk away for a while. Had to do that for a few days this week and last. Whet the scythe well :) Fiddle Faddle 16:32, 27 November 2014 (UTC) reply

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mahatma Gandhi. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 30 November 2014 (UTC) reply

You took place in a discussion in which the decision to merge the Sentinels Of The Multiverse article with that for the video game port was taken. We are attempting to discuss this merger on the videogame talk page, and are seeking input from the members involved in the discussion. If you would join us that would be appreciated, otherwise, thank you for your time. Aawood ( talk) 12:40, 4 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi, EBY3221. You very kindly a few weeks ago gave some great feedback on my page, Fifth Street Management (link here: /info/en/?search=Draft:Fifth_Street_Management). I spent a few hours today with editors on the live chat, and they helped me implement all your changes and feedback, indicating they no longer saw any red flags with the article (Howicus and Huon were the editors). Are you able to give this another quick look? Many thanks in advance for your help. Best Peter

Chris Troutman ( talk) 02:27, 5 December 2014 (UTC) reply

• Jimdoughertyonamission ( talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Michelle Anthony ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello. I'm a novice at creating Wikipedia pages but I'm flummoxed as to why Michelle Anthony doesn't meet the threshold of notability necessary for inclusion in Wikipedia. I tried to be exhaustive with references in order to substantiate the content and am afraid that by referencing her content too often I may have given a less than neutral impression about the piece (and it's not entirely inaccurate, I'm a fan of her music).

I would ask you to reconsider this piece with any edits that would maintain the neutrality of the piece. As evidence of her notoriety, I submit that she collaborated with less notable artists and on less notable projects than are already included in Wikipedia, and in the most successful period of her career there was not as much online publishing as there is now. I've found additional links to critiques of her work that no longer exist, which aren't especially helpful in the context of a Wikipedia article but that substantiate her notoriety at the peak of her career.

Would you please help me to properly share this information despite my own shortcomings as a contributor? Jim Dougherty ( talk) 06:42, 6 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Jim Dougherty ( talk) 06:42, 6 December 2014 (UTC) reply

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Chandra Levy. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 8 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kashmir Family Aid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Razoo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC) reply

I saw today that you had worked on the Sun Myung Moon article last year and made some improvements. What is the situation that article (and Unification Church if you're familiar with it), in your view? I've noticed several articles on Wikipedia edited by cult adherents in ways that make the articles sound (at least in some parts) like what I would expect from their own literature rather than from reliable sources, but the more I look at these two articles the more it seems they are among the worst in that regard, with a group of editors (who are apparently members) slowly but continually "cleaning" them. Your thoughts? DrSocPsych ( talk) 22:19, 12 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:MikeLong.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 01:05, 13 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:MikeLongOMgVegas.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 02:06, 13 December 2014 (UTC) reply

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bibi Aisha. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 16 December 2014 (UTC) reply

• 87.149.173.208 ( talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Fritz Stuber ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

For secondary reliable sources independent of the subject see e. g.: References 1 and 5 = Institute for the History and Theory of Architecture of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich. Not a secondary reliable source? (See there.) Reference 2 = The Academy of Architecture of the Università della Svizzera Italiana (University of Lugano). Not a secondary reliable source? (See there or biblio.arch.usi.ch/it/fondi.html) Reference 11 = Archives of the Canton of Aargau in Switzerland. Not a secondary reliable source? (See there.) 87.149.173.208 ( talk) 17:12, 19 December 2014 (UTC) Merteuil reply

87.149.173.208 ( talk) 17:12, 19 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Debt consolidation

added links pointing to Default, Collateral, Fiscal and Equity

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:01, 22 December 2014 (UTC) reply

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Education. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 24 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi EBY, thank you again for all your help with the article, I really appreciate it!

I'm wondering if I could persuade you to consider this as well: Title (and content) of article.

Best, Djbaniel ( talk) 12:32, 24 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Resuelve Tu Deuda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:36, 29 December 2014 (UTC) reply

I approved your application British Newspaper Archive almost a month ago. I've still not received your information as my e-mail to you requested. If I don't have your information in my spreadsheet by 5 January, I'll archive your application without action immediately thereafter. Chris Troutman ( talk) 21:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC) reply

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 1 January 2015 (UTC) reply

		The Articles for Creation barnstar
		Keep up the good work in AFC Becky Sayles ( talk) 02:50, 1 January 2015 (UTC) reply

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard.

We have a backlog of cases there which need volunteer attention. If you have time available, please take one or more of these cases.

If you do not intend to take cases or help with the administration of DRN on a regular basis, or if you do not wish to receive further notices of this nature, please remove your username from the volunteer list. If you later decide to resume activities at DRN you may relist your name at that time.

Best regards, TransporterMan 15:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Roger Scruton. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello. I did some editing of the above article on the Draft page and then, because I thought it was ready to go, I copied it into article space. I'm sorry if this was not the correct way to handle this, but I figured we might as well get the piece out in the open where others can take a look at it. Hope this is OK and that I did not mess up the system too much. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis ( talk) 22:55, 14 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1-800-GOT-JUNK?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franchise. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2014 Cairns child killings. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 17 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dave Scott (triathlete), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kona. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:EReleases Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Chris Kyle. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 25 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi EBY3221. I hate to be a pest, but I noticed that LowercaseSigmabot archived the Friedrich Goldmann dispute without formal closure. Your decision looked very final to me, but Planetdust never responded, and I am unsure how to proceed without his further cooperation. If I were to simply go ahead and restore the information to the article on my own and Planetdust just reverted my edit again, what should be my course of action? Take him to the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, or is there a less drastic alternative?— Jerome Kohl ( talk) 04:47, 25 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Snoop Dogg. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC) reply

• Rajkumar100989 ( talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Yash Aradhya ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

As this is the first time I am submitting an article on Wikipedia there were few citation errors and reference errors. I have rectified the same and ensured all the citations are from reputed media houses.

Rajkumar100989 ( talk) 05:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nikola Tesla. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of American federal politicans convicted of crimes. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 26 February 2015 (UTC) reply

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Breda O'Brien. Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 6 March 2015 (UTC) reply

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Paul Singer (businessman). Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:EReleases Logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC) reply

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Acharya S. Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 24 March 2015 (UTC) reply

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:G. Edward Griffin. Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 1 April 2015 (UTC) reply

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oldest people. Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 9 April 2015 (UTC) reply

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mark Ghuneim. Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC) reply

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:G. Edward Griffin. Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC) reply

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Simon Collins. Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC) reply

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peter May (disambiguation). Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi, thanks for your feedback. I changed the lede/introductory sentence. Hope it works better! — Preceding unsigned comment added by KaleToTheChief ( talk • contribs) 19:28, 11 May 2015 (UTC) reply

• Andiamo ( talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Fritz Stuber ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

See comments under edit. We suggest that an editor (preferably with ability to understand German and Italian) should do what was suggested: click on references. They are very well known and independent sources. The information is verifiable and reliable. The article should then be accepted or deleted.

Andiamo ( talk) 12:56, 15 May 2015 (UTC) reply

talk - Responded on article page. EBY ( talk) 15:32, 15 May 2015 (UTC) reply