![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 7 |
I nominated the Ford Piquette Avenue Plant article for FA status here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ford Piquette Avenue Plant/archive1. I saw on the Wikipedia:Mentoring for FAC page that you have an interest in history, so I believe the subject of this article may interest you. This building played a huge yet mostly unknown role in the early years of the automotive industry in the United States. Any input that you would be willing to provide on its review page would be helpful, but what will help the most is confirming whether it meets the FA criteria. Thanks in advance. Jackdude101 talk cont 23:33, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I have a request and I hope you can help. I have problems using the Harvard citations when a certain author writes three articles in the same year and all are cited in a Wiki article. For example, from the article of Ebla, Paolo Matthiae have three articles dating to 2013. So the shortened citation will be {{sfn|Matthiae|2013}} , but this will link all those short citations to one article in the bibliography while the intended article of one of them might be another one from the same year. I tried to look for an answer in all the Wiki articles about citations but couldnt find anything and since you use the Harvard style I thought you might have a clue. Thanks.-- Attar-Aram syria ( talk) 02:08, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Military history reviewers' award | |
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of 4 Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period January to March 2018. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes.
AustralianRupert (
talk) 08:51, 20 April 2018 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
Unsourced but accurate, the discovery by an 18 year old boy might be worth including. Doug Weller talk 12:40, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Henry prince of wales. Since you had some involvement with the Henry prince of wales redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 13:13, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Dear Mr. Miles, I was surprised and dismayed to find that you had reverted my addition today to the above entry. I hope you may reconsider. The physical aspect of the abbey is not the only one; the human is very important. That author, Victoria Glendinning, is primarily known as a biographer and recognized for her impeccable historical research. I would have thought that many people, either considering a visit to the Abbey , or having visited it, would be pleased to have that information and would derive extra benefit and enjoyment as a result. Aineireland ( talk) 22:33, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Dudley, I've started a talk page discussion, to which you may be interested in contributing. All the best, ~dom Kaos~ ( talk) 08:35, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I just wanted to point out that I did not put those links there to be used as a source or reference, but as an external link to a website run by the government and the royal household. I know that they are considered primary sources, but as you can see I added them in an appropriate section under "External links" which means that the Wikipedia articles are obviously not based on them. Regards. Keivan.f Talk 16:55, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I am sure you would wish to know that this article needs your attention Aineireland ( talk) 19:26, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Did you mean to write seventh instead of sixth? Aineireland ( talk) 12:48, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | |
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:42, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Hey Dudley Miles,
I was wondering if you would be willing to take a look at Gordian dynasty and tell me how I can improve it and if you think it could pass at FAC.
Thanks! Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 23:48, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I would like New Albion become a featured article and have done a lot to improve it. It has been an article that has had editors disagree a lot in the past, but now it has settled down. I have worked on it after peer review. It would be really great if you would take a look at it and tell me what you think of the article at this point. Pcvjamaica ( talk) 01:04, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
I would also like to know your opinion about the very last section about localized legacy. As I've worked on it, I am beginning to wonder if it is best to remove it from the article. The information seems mostly trivial (well maybe the first protestant service in North America isn't, but I don't know where that would fit with the article--and I don't know that it really does add much.) Keeping this section also seems to be a way for individual people and groups to bring attention to themselves without really trying to improve the article. I am really trying to get this to be a featured article and appreciate your help. Pcvjamaica ( talk) 16:39, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi there,
Would be willing to take a look at the Hong Kong article? I've worked on this article pretty extensively for a few months now and I'd love a bit of closer input on it. After two rounds of FACs, I probably can't do this alone and would appreciate a guiding hand in the process.
Thanks, Horserice ( talk) 22:44, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
I notice this in the BL's latest batch of forthcoming events, and I draw it to your attention just in case it might be of interest: "Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms: Art, Word, War". – Tim riley talk 13:29, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.
Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Dudley. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Local Nature Reserves in Northamptonshire – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for October 15. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 22:33, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Just dropping in to thank you for the review and support on the Bulgaria FAC. - ☣ Tourbillon A ? 13:32, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I was wondering if you might be willing to help me with this article, which would be my first FAC. Since achieving GA status a few months ago, I put it up for PR and one editor said that he would support it at FAC if I had it copyedited. A very competent editor at GOCE had a look and made many prose improvements. My question is, should I go ahead and FA nominate it? My understanding is that many topics that are a bit out of the way fail due to insufficient interest/supports. Thanks for your help. Catrìona ( talk) 10:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Dudley Miles. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Dudley Miles. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
You seem to know the topic and I would trust your judgement if you want to fix that value. Meanwhile the Nat Geographic would look better than the one I had originally put as a ref. Best regards. Slight Smile 18:24, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello Dudley Miles I have added projects England, Environment, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. ( To reply click "edit" next to this section, and add your reply at the end. ) Cheers, -- Gryllida ( talk) 11:22, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I've been trying to promote Mahavira to FA, but my efforts were not good enough. Recently, I was referred to FAC mentorship program, and hence I am posting this to seek your guidance for the same. Capankajsmilyo( Talk | Infobox assistance) 06:45, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
FYI, Dudley, there is no "standard" formating for ISBNs and their hyphens. WorldCat (US), Amazon (International), and the British Library present ISBN info without hyphens. (Here is the BL data for Hemingway by Nicholas McDowell (1987): UIN: BLL01011404170.) And WP will read the ISBNs in templates with or without hyphens and with or without spaces. So, please look at the Black Death revert and you'll see that some of your reverted edits do not have hyphens. Thanks. – S. Rich ( talk) 21:44, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy Saturnalia | |
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC) |
![]() |
Gothic Seasons Greetings |
![]() |
Wishing you all the best for x-mass, hope it is a time of cheer. Ceoil ( talk) 21:34, 23 December 2018 (UTC) |
Hi, I left an answer for your question at Talk:Younger Dryas. I hope it helps. Merry Christmas. Paul H. ( talk) 21:58, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Season's Greetings | |
Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Adoration of the Shepherds (Cariani) is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod ( talk) 10:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC) |
Thanks and a merry Christmas and happy new year to you Johnbod. Dudley Miles ( talk) 19:19, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Austral season's greetings |
Tuck into this! We've made about three of these in the last few days for various festivities. Supermarkets are stuffed with cheap berries. Season's greetings! Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 22:14, 24 December 2018 (UTC) |
Hi, Dudley. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Rutland – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for January 21, 2019. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 01:22, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
The Æthelred hatnotes are not needed because the titles (and redirects) are not ambiguous. At Æthelred the Unready there was an ambiguous redirect ( Æthelred II), so I added a hatnote and created a dab page. You reverted that one too... Srnec ( talk) 18:15, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Epic Barnstar | |
For your work on Edward the Elder you are hereby awarded The Epic Barnstar. Congrats! TomStar81 ( Talk) 19:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Biography Barnstar | |
For your work on Edward the Elder you are hereby awarded The Biography Barnstar. Congrats! TomStar81 ( Talk) 19:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For work on SSSI and Wildlife Trust reserves, and travelling to take the photos as well. Dedication. Mramoeba ( talk) 09:58, 18 January 2019 (UTC) |
Talk:Margaret of France, Queen of England and Hungary and several other deletions I did earlier... I didn't finish because I got reverted in my reversions... Ealdgyth - Talk 14:51, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, just a note to say that User:Lingzhi2/reviewsourcecheck has been update to add the option to toggle it on or off.
The installed script will add a tab to the drop-down tab at the top, located between the 'watchlist star' and the search box (using the vector.js skin). The tab toggles between "Hide ref check" and "Show ref check" with displaying the errors as the default option. You may need to edit Special:MyPage/common.js and change User:Lingzhi/reviewsourcecheck to User:Lingzhi2/reviewsourcecheck (add the "2" after User:Lingzhi). Please do drop me a line if you have any problems or suggestions. Tks. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 15:54, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Dudley, Check message on Filsham Reedbed talkpage Aineireland ( talk) 14:05, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pasture and Asplin Woods is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pasture and Asplin Woods until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RhinosF1 (chat) (status) (contribs) 10:07, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Please take a second look at this revert and your edit summary? I take it you meant to revert something in a different browser tab you had open? Blue Danube ( talk) 17:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello Dudley. You were helpful when I drafted up the 'Ludham Borehole' and 'Norwich Crag Formation' pages in 2017. They have since developed severed link rot in their references - I don't know why, as I haven't touched them since then. I have tried to locate the source of the problem (somebody else's editing?) but have now thought best to unpublish the bad bits by reverting the pages to headers only, by bracketing off the infected sub-sections with the symbols. Take a look at on 'Ludham Borehole', for example. The problem is that all the references keep sticking at number 1, with an error message there and a stack of error messages in the references sub-section at the bottom. I have checked the syntax / coding of the references but cannot find any errors in them. Can you offer any advice, please? Tall-timothy ( talk) 16:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. That is potentially helpful advice and I will try it. Have the Wikipedia templates changed?? Both my guide book 'Wikipedia The Missing Manual' (Broughton, J; O'Reilly Media, 2008) and the online help both recommend using the '' symbols.
I have just heard from somebody called
User:Ronhjones in the Help system. They wrote: You have ref=name=''xxxx'' - should be ref name="xxxx"
- double quotes required NOT two single quotes.
I will try both approaches.
Tall-timothy (
talk) 22:02, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for your attention on the vandalism for Chimpanzee–human last common ancestor . That did not take long. Akrasia25 ( talk) 17:17, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
The article Sladden Wood has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Tiny park that is otherwise not notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
UnitedStatesian (
talk) 22:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the Æthelberht, King of Wessex article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 24, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 24, 2019, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.
We also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors on the day before and the day of this TFA. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:41, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your feedback. I've updated the edits a bit to fix what you mentioned in your comment on the Vikings page. Blomsterhagens ( talk) 17:46, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Dudley,I had made 2 changes to The Mens. Did you miss the second? Aineireland ( talk) 13:10, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding Preston Park (Brent), I would like to know why you think it should have its own article? It's just a local park and is small in size, with no significant history or anything behind it. Compare it with other Brent parks listed in Parks and open spaces in the London Borough of Brent which are larger and notable parks with sizable information on their articles. Preston Park does not hold credibility for that and because of it the article will likely always remain a short stub, since there's simply not much to write about it, thus I can't see why it should have its own article. I've already merged its info into Preston, London when I performed the redirect. -- MetrolandNW ( talk) 16:03, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Dear Dudley,
It was good to meet you the other week. Inspired by your SSSI lists, I've put Grade I listed buildings in Monmouthshire up for FLC. If you had the time/inclination, I'd very much appreciate your input in terms of improvement. I also have a specific request re. the Grade II* list. It's not yet ready for FLC - too many redlinks and too many missing images. But I'm having a recurring problem. I stupidly left out the access dates for the citations in the Grade I, an omission which User:ChrisTheDude pointed out and which I think I've corrected. But when I try to do the same for the Grade II* list, I mess up the Sources section and end up with a series of odd template messages. I've not got a clue what I'm doing wrong and would really appreciate any guidance. With many thanks in anticipation. KJP1 ( talk) 10:55, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Forgive me coming back to this but notwithstanding "fen" being correct , could you double check that there is still not a problem , particularly relating to herbs( a habitat?) Is there a misprint in the first source you use as reference? I see there is a phenomenon called "tall-herb fen". Is this what it should be? So sorry if I am taking up your time Aineireland ( talk) 14:51, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
And copied to SchroCat after our solicited audit of two of your FLs. If you have a moment would you mind casting an eye over Keswick, Cumbria? It's up for the front page next month and I'd like it to be as fireproof as possible. All comments gratefully received: be unsparing! Ever thine, Tim riley talk 21:30, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() | |
Five years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Sorry for bothering.
I've noticed your name in the list of the WP:FAC mentors. Recently, I have released
a new article about Indonesian home gardens and I hope that it would be satisfactory to the standards of a featured article. However, I'm afraid that I've made major errors that I haven't noticed yet. If you have any time to give any advice or constructive criticism, comments in its
peer review page would be appreciated. Thank you in advance!
Dhio-
270599 17:21, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Wanted to ping that I'd responded to your comments. -- Golbez ( talk) 03:44, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello Dudley. I notice that you lately reverted some edits by InternetArchiveBot: your edit summary of "Not needed" for this edit makes me wonder if you might be interested in this discussion, in which it transpires that this type of edit made by this bot might be useful after all. For example, the first citation to Keynes & Lapidge at Æthelflæd refers to pp. 11–12, and those pages can be viewed at archive.org by manipulating the relevant URL added by InternetArchiveBot, from " https://archive.org/details/alfredgreatasser0000asse" to " https://archive.org/details/alfredgreatasser0000asse/page/11". Pages 11 and 12 then become visible. Longer page ranges would be problematical. If that is at all relevant to why you made those reverts, then I share your concern. It is why I started that discussion – links to book covers and end pages alone seemed silly to me, and I too reverted a similar bot edit – and at present I see no way of accessing a longer range of pages. If it isn't relevant, please accept my apologies for disturbing you. Nortonius ( talk) 11:31, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Dudley. I'm just posting to let you know that Kent Wildlife Trust – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for September 13. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 21:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edit in Edgar Ætheling? Jimmyy68 ( talk) 00:18, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Dudley, This needs your attention re the references to birdlife. Aineireland ( talk) 23:08, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Just wanted to reach out and see if you had anything else for the review, as I've addressed everything else there. Kaiser matias ( talk) 03:16, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
The LFI list states that it is intended to include former members. You can find current members here { https://www.lfi.org.uk/in-parliament/}. Jontel ( talk) 14:13, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Dudley, The Flora section has a problem Aineireland ( talk) 01:17, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Dudley, There is a problem with the first reference Aineireland ( talk) 01:31, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Dudley. While browsing somewhat aimlessly in the FLC area, I came across this list. Just a note to say I am going to edit the blurb about Ditchling Beacon for factual accuracy (and in line with the source), as the 360-degree view actually refers to both the Weald and the Sussex coast. Facing northwards you have a 180-degree view across the Weald, while southwards the view is across the coast. Hassocks 5489 (Floreat Hova!) 14:07, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
You are almost in breach of WP:3RR across lots of articles. Please stop reverting my edits or I'll have to report you to an admin. doktorb words deeds 15:50, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Promotion of one single candidate is bias and counter to Wikipedia policy. Be very careful. doktorb words deeds 21:14, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
I've reported you to the 3RR noticeboard. doktorb words deeds 22:49, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Hey Dudley Miles, I hope you are well. I was hoping to seek your help, and more specifically your support as a mentor, in order to get Elizabeth College, Guernsey to featured article standard. Let me know if it's something you'd be interested in. Many thanks. — Formula One wiki 21:22, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Starve a fever, feed a cold as they say! Sorry you're under the weather DM. Get well soon! —— SN 54129 17:40, 7 December 2019 (UTC) |
![]() |
Season's Greetings | |
Wishing you a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Mystical Nativity (Filippo Lippi) is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod ( talk) 16:39, 17 December 2019 (UTC) |
![]() |
Io, Saturnalia! | |
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:26, 20 December 2019 (UTC) |
Hi, Dudley. I'm just posting to let you know that List of local nature reserves in Cambridgeshire – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for January 13, 2020. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 23:29, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Dudley, can I check if I have now fully addressed your comments on the FL review page? I have addressed those of all other commenters. Thanks again. Onceinawhile ( talk) 13:19, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the Æthelbald, King of Wessex article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 25, 2020. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 25, 2020, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.
For Featured Articles promoted on or after October 1, 2018, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.
We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you the article about "the first of four brothers who were successively Kings of Wessex, the youngest of whom was Alfred the Great"! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:14, 25 January 2020 (UTC)