![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
− − Hi, don't forget to put your signature on talk pages with four tildes ~~~~, like that -- AW 04:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
− −
−
−
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!
HagermanBot 23:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
− −
− − Please see the proposal that's been made at the end of the talk page. In addition, I'd like to invite you to start Spider-Man 3 (novelization). You can write about the book's plot following the guidelines presented by WikiProject Books. We'll link to the article, although we'll probably attach a disclaimer that says the novelization's plot may not ultimately match the film's plot. Let us know your thoughts. — Erik ( talk • contrib • review) - 01:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
− −
− − I'm willing to look completely beyond the blatant falsehoods you've asserted in your past few edit summaries (i.e. saying that it was me who put in that he is regarded as one of the most exciting young players in the world) and work towards a consensus on the issues at hand. I have begun a talk page discussion to get additional input from other editors. Like I said in my post there, I don't expect you to be able to maintain a civil or constructive discussion on the issue, but as a courtesy...I wanted to mention that such a discussion has been started. Batman2005 00:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
− −
− I'm sure you have the page on your watchlist, but if not, I thought I would bring your attention to Talk:Freddy Adu, where I have offered my opinion on things. :) -- Dreaded Walrus t c 07:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
− − The two Italian youth teams are listed in the SI article (ref. 1). AlbertHall 01:22, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
−
−
−
+
Please discuss your edits at the talk page -under the same section heading as above. I will be noting the problems with them before reverting them again, as part of restructuring into separate Politics and Allegations of antisemitism sections. Failure to discuss while hurling insults at other editors and subjects of articles against WP:BLP is against a number of wikipedia policies. Carol Moore 16:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
+
Please note involved editors are discussing reverting all edits made that are not discussed and backed up as accurately sourced. So there will be several of us reverting your questionable edits which delete sourced material and defend only with POV personal opinions. This is against WP:BLP and a number of wikipedia policies. Carol Moore 15:51, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
− Thanks for uploading File:Sid-bernstein.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
− − To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
− − For more information on using images, see the following pages:
−
−
− − Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 20:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
− −
− An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Sid-bernstein.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ErikTheBikeMan ( talk) 23:08, 23 December 2008 (UTC) -- ErikTheBikeMan ( talk) 23:08, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
−
− Thanks for uploading File:Sid-bernstein.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
− − For more information on using images, see the following pages:
−
−
− − This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:40, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
− −
− − I'm really not all that familiar with Wikipedia's policies on images. You might want to copy this: {{helpme}} with a question about images on your talk page. All I know is that randomly picking an image from the web is not acceptable. Cheers, ErikTheBikeMan ( talk) 03:42, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
−
− Thanks for uploading File:Hanna Szenesh.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
− − For more information on using images, see the following pages:
−
−
− − This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:49, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
− −
− An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Sid-bernstein.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ErikTheBikeMan ( talk) 18:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC) -- ErikTheBikeMan ( talk) 18:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
− −
−
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on File:Sid bernstein.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because File:Sid bernstein.jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles ( CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case [1] [2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.
− − If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{ GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{ cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{ PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
− − If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
− − If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate File:Sid bernstein.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. CSDWarnBot ( talk) 01:10, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
− −
− Your repeated allegations that the subject and possibly other editors are antisemites, when you bother to engage in talk at all violate WP:Civility. Your replacing WP:RS material with unsourced material in the lead violated WP:RS. And I'm counting everybody's 3rrs. Thanks. Cooperative editing appreciated. CarolMooreDC ( talk) 18:02, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
− −
− −
−
−
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below. +
See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#Per_WP:ARBPIA.2C_User:Drsmoo_in_Gilad_Atzmon CarolMooreDC ( talk) 01:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
+
As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.
+ +
+
+
+
+ +
These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.
+ +
Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.
+ +
This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged here.
+ +
PhilKnight ( talk) 13:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
+
This recent talk page comment is problematic. In my honest opinion, you are being unnecessarily confrontational. Have a look at Wikipedia:ARBPIA#Principles, you should be engaging in a calm, reasonable and courteous discussion in an effort to resolve the disagreement in a dignified fashion, with a constructive and collaborative outlook. Also, note that revert rules should not be construed as an entitlement or inalienable right to revert, nor do they endorse reverts as an editing technique. If these problems persist then an topic ban could be applied. PhilKnight ( talk) 14:31, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
− − please revert this edit to israel shamir. i appreciate the fact that you are taking my suggestions to heart on the atzmon article, but you must know that edit is not only a blp issue, but also is in violation of the arbpia that you were recently notified of. i am not one who is quick to run off to noticeboards and file reports because it usually only increases the drama and entrenchment. but i'd appreciate if you'd self-revert - that type of statement has no place in the article as fact, and shouldn't be in the lead even attributed. thanks. untwirl( talk) 04:31, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
−
− Hi Drsmoo, I'd like to clarify article talk pages should be used to discuss improvements to the article, not to expound your own views, and certainly not to express derogatory views concerning living persons, whether they are the subject of the article, or other editors. PhilKnight ( talk) 21:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
what jzg said was, "The Board f Deputies are not rabid Zionists," which i think you are interpreting as "all zionists are rabid." to me it seemed that he was saying that they aren't extremist zionists, but moderates. can you see that interpretation? untwirl( talk) 02:06, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
FYI: My experience with Wikiquette alerts, having both made complaints there, and been complained about there: its a waste of time. There is not much harm in trying, but take a look at the current discussions to see what you will be getting into. Malcolm Schosha ( talk) 14:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a
general rule, talk pages such as
Talk:Hamas are for discussion related to improving the article,
not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.
Tarc (
talk) 05:07, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I saw you mentioning moderators' approval in your edit summary. It's truly sad to see the pro-antisemite spirit soar even here on Wikipedia. Please point at the aforementioned approval, I'd like to see the discussion. Drone2Gather ( talk) 19:15, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of David | |
Thank you for your vigorous attempts to fight off the antisemitic consensus (cunningly disguised as WP:Neutral) on Wikipedia. Drone2Gather ( talk) 20:39, 13 May 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:Rachel-corrie-flag-02.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:11, 23 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Muchness ( talk) 06:11, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Gilad Atzmon. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
tedder (
talk) 21:22, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
I wasn't concerned with what you wrote about Carol. I was referring to your description of Atzmon's opinions as "Mein Kampf inspired statements on Judaism". I've deleted it. Feel free to restore a sanitized version of it if you'd like. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 05:18, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Just wondering about the antisemitic business on the Atzmon article. I don't think I can edit it due to my topic ban, or even talk about it on talk pages of the article, although the conversation about antisemitism is another issue. Can't one say that many Jews consider him antisemitic as in this article from the Institute for Global Jewish Affairs (which appears to be an offshoot of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs)? Add to this any other Jewish orgs that make the claim. If there are non-Jewish notables that make the claim that would strike me as sufficient, true or not. If people say he is antisemitic that should be sufficient, no? This would avoid the blanket issue of what constitutes antisemitism. Consider the article on Al Sharpton. His views have generated claims of racism that are clearly delineated in the article. We do not use the WP voice to make such a claim but if we have the RS that make the claim then it is a controversy that should be added I would think. Pardon my rambling. Stellarkid ( talk) 18:29, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello Drsmoo. Per WP:ANI#Please ban two users from article Gilad Atzmon you and Carol might be able to arrange a voluntary topic ban from the Gilad Atzmon article for two months. Consider replying at the ANI if you have an opinion on this. EdJohnston ( talk) 03:58, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello Drsmoo. I wanted to clear up a misunderstanding that seems to have arisen at AN/I. I never suggested that you should be permanently banned from editing all articles on Wikipedia.
One other thing: Like you, I have a POV about Atzmon -- but I've never expressed my POV and you don't know what it is. Please AGF and don't blame my actions on my (unknown) POV. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 07:16, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Venezuela-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining
WikiProject Venezuela? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's Venezuela-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the
list of participants. Please see our
list of open tasks for ideas on where to get started.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 13:39, 26 February 2010 (UTC) |
Drsmoo -- just to clarify, is it your position that (1) there was no need to create a new subsection for the Duke information, which belongs in the "statements on Jews and Judaism" section, or (2) that the Duke information doesn't belong on the page? Cheers! RT-LAMP ( talk) 23:11, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Could you take a look at my comment on Carol's talk page and answer on my talk page? I intended to pose the same question to both of you, but I'm editing from a cell phone at the moment. Thanks. Viriditas ( talk) 01:46, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ALeqM5hsKMJuCoXVL9LGFWr3Xf1YXYwU4Q.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rockfang ( talk) 18:42, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:ALeqM5hsKMJuCoXVL9LGFWr3Xf1YXYwU4Q.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 05:45, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Wounded Israeli Soldier - Gaza flotilla raid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 05:16, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Your additions to the Gilad BLP have been mentioned [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Gilad_Atzmon here at the BLPN} Off2riorob ( talk) 15:18, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
As promised, discussion re your actions now on AN/I. Nomoskedasticity ( talk) 22:08, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. —
Malik Shabazz
Talk/
Stalk 01:47, 1 August 2010 (UTC) Please do not add or change content without citing
verifiable and
reliable sources, as you did to
Israelites. Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Your sources do not say the Israelites are the genetic origin of the Jews, that is your interpretation.
Dougweller (
talk) 17:29, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Carolmooredc has given you a
kitten! Kittens promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{ subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{ subst:Kittynap}}
Please note that I have placed a notice regarding your violation of 1RR on this noticeboard Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Oncenawhile ( talk) 12:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
There is no 1RR rule listed as being in place for that article anywhere. Drsmoo ( talk) 15:34, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. -
2/0 (
cont.) 18:44, 13 March 2011 (UTC)During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
Drsmoo, you were notified here that the topic area comprising our articles on Israel/Palestine and related articles has historically been highly contentious, and is consequently subject to special discretionary sanctions. You appear to be correct that the notice of 1RR did not appear on the article in question, but that does not make your edits any the less disruptive. Move warring to your preferred article name is particularly damaging to the project, especially in this politically-charged topic area. The proper procedure for renaming an article following a consensus discussion is outlined at WP:MOVE. - 2/0 ( cont.) 18:44, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Drsmoo ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
There was no 1rr warning listed anywhere in the article, nor was there a 1rr rule in effect for the article, the name of the article was in place for over two years and the current name , "history of the southern levant" was popular and well accepted in the talk page. I reverted Oncenawhile's edits fully within all wikipedia guidelines. I know the 3rr rule for articles and would not have exceeded it. Had there been guidelines in effect which had stated editing policies in effect for the article, I would have adhered to them, as I adhered to every guideline that was stated for the article. If Oncenawhile wishes to change the name of the article he should go through the proper channels, Drsmoo (talk) 23:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You were warned about the general restriction almost two years ago and should understand that it applies to all articles relevant to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, even if they don't have an explicit tag on their talk page. Nick-D ( talk) 06:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Injured IDF Soldier aboard the Mavi Marmara.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cptnono ( talk) 05:59, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Drsmoo, good to see you back editing again. I hope you are doing well.
Thought i'd post here rather than on the various pages you amended yesterday, regarding your strongly held view that Southern Levant is a better name than Palestine. Rather than reverting your changes, I thought perhaps we could discuss here and reach a position together.
I think our disagreement boils down to our interpretations of two policies: WP:COMMONNAME vs. WP:POVTITLE.
Would you agree with that?
Oncenawhile ( talk) 17:18, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
OK, great. My response to your post above is that it doesn't include any sources. The editors you linked to gave their views (the latter of which then followed their view with a shocking and offensive rant), but neither provided sources. Also, there was a very meaningful amount of additional debate on the page you linked to, which you have chosen to ignore. Either way, by linking to two editors' views you are commenting on what may or may not have been consensus. As mentioned above, wikipedia policies encourage us to discuss the substance of the issue, for the reasons given above.
Can you please provide verifiable sources which verify your claims about the correct name? Oncenawhile ( talk) 21:53, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
I note your questions here Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Naming_Dispute_over_History_of_Pottery_in_the_Southern_Levant.
Can I suggest you read the following precedent discussion, to see how WP deals with these things:
I think it would be great to resolve this dispute in the same way (given all the overlapping articles in this space), but from what I have seen the above discussion caused so much editor discussion fatigue that there may not be appetite.
Oncenawhile ( talk) 15:11, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
This revert of existing material was done only 6 hours after this revert of existing material. Note both were problematic reverts, including of material previously discussed, and look like edit warring. But I'll give you a chance to revert the second one yourself. CarolMooreDC🗽 04:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. CarolMooreDC🗽 05:27, 25 April 2013 (UTC)