|
Template:Picture has no copyright. Free from use, according to www.bronzes.cn has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --- Royalguard11( Talk· Desk· Review Me!) 18:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, It's nice to have a Chinese view on this. Other editors keep on removing relevant categories - Category:Terrorism in China and Category:Terrorism in Central Asia. Please make sure to re-add the categories in your edits, thanks, KazakhPol 20:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!! I restored the deletion again, I have noticed that he tried to delete your tag.... Dongwenliang 00:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
I deleted all the notices since the issues have been resolved. Nardman1 02:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Khoikoi reverted your edits to Huseyincan Celil. KazakhPol 06:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I'll do what I can about them, but since I'm not an administrator I have no special power to not delete them. Nardman1 21:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Xihoudu, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.chinaculture.org/gb/en_travel/2003-09/24/content_33639.htm. As a copyright violation, Xihoudu appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Xihoudu has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. – riana_ dzasta 03:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jiahu-marking.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Sadly the template was deleted at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 March 29 because the English Wikipedia uses U.S. law. You'll have to tag the images as fair use and include copies of the emails you've received. Nardman1 15:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
I am unsure I can give you a satisfactory answer as I am unable to parse all of your text. I can tell you, however, that when we speak of "fair use" we are dealing with copyright law which is widely different from country to country. The only copyright law that is relevant to content copyrighted in the United States is United States copyright law. You can find relevant information about United States copyright law pertaining to fair use at Wikipedia:Fair use. Regards, Iamunknown 16:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Music-Bell.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Xia-marking.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:32, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Could you help me translate the copyright notice on minghui.org so I can use some images on Wikipedia? The text is "正法度人不取费用。欢迎参加世界各地的自发集体炼功活动 明慧网版权所有 © 1999-2007 MINGHUI.ORG 欢迎转载,但请注明出处" Thank you very much! Nardman1 00:03, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
An anonymous user, 24.225.241.241, just removed the "Views of the People's Republic of China" section from the article on Huseyincan Celil. I thought you would like to know. KazakhPol 23:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jiahu-marking.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. - N 22:31, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Xiaochangliang-site.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. - Nard 05:08, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
I came here to review the unblock request but there is no block listed in your blocklog against this account directly. You may be affected by an IP block or range-block. Please check that you really are blocked. If you are, to assist us in reviewing the block, please copy here the exact message you receive when you try to edit. If you would prefer not to post this information here (it may contain your IP information), you can e-mail it to the unblock mailing list instead (see Wikipedia:Appealing a block for details). Newyorkbrad 02:42, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
here i is. Kfc1864 talk my edits 08:57, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
I am blocked the second time by Ryulong. The first block was a group block, and this time the reason said was open proxy. I sent an email to [email protected], but I am still blocked. Please help and thanks. Dongwenliang 00:16, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
I understand that you find the image offensive. That in and of itself, is not enough to justify censoring the image. In my opinion, nothing is enough to justify censorship. I abhor censorship in all forms, whether it is a method of control by an oppressive government, or if it's because someone finds something offensive. If you don't want to see something, don't look at it. We all have free will, and most of us are adults. I don't need anyone telling me what I can and cannot look at, read, or say, and I don't think anyone else does either. Parsecboy 15:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Dong, please don't take offence but you only speak for yourself. If other editors object then fair enough, but we have to deal with those people that actually express their views.
Also so many people are offended by different things. If we tried to accomodate everyone's views then a huge number of Wikipedia articles would have to be deleted or at least severely reduced. You can't please everyone. John Smith's 20:04, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Stop removing the image, or I'll report you for disruptive editing. Parsecboy 16:48, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
I understand that you are offended (and any other Chinese as well) but we can't edit everything because a certain group doesn't like it. Say, for example, biased editors turn the article Liancourt Rocks so that Koreans don't like it. Simply because we don't like it doesn't mean that the article can be changed so that we like it.
Same with the image in Korean War. Its just an image thats part of an article. Nobody is here to put that image on to offend China and outside readers are just going to treat the image like any other else. Good friend100 19:20, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Please do not edit war on Korean War. I see you have been deleting images from this featured article, in spite of repeated opposition from other editors. [1] [2] [3] You are a good editor with a long history and a clear block log. Do not spoil that. If edit warring continues I may block you, as well as other editors, to stop the problem. I suggest you use the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution process instead. This will help resolve differences of opinion amicably. Thank you. - Jehochman Talk 21:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Xia-bronze2.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fred- J 16:13, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Simuwu.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fred- J 16:14, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Both images are still missing fair use rationales... / Fred- J 14:21, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Music-Bell.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 16:48, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
As a fellow Chinese, I urge you to reconsider your judgement of the image of the dead Chinese soldier of the Korean War. Personally, I do not feel that the image is offensive or "insulting" to the Chinese people in any way, as you describe. Indeed, when I first sighted the photo, I assumed it to be some sort of image from the propaganda which our government has so often relied on, or perhaps from a book authored by a Chinese, much like the photos depicted in The Rape of Nanking. If a Chinese herself would bring herself to put such gruesome photos in her book, I do not see why Wikipedia should not.
What concerns me even more, however, is your discussion with a few fellow Wikipedians on the inclusion of the image. A Chinese myself, I could say that I understand your sentiments at times when interacting with Western counterparts; however, quoting the words both of our ancestors and of Wikipedia, one should assume good faith in all circumstances. The Chinese people's inclusion among the world's people will not be certified by military or economic power, but by a noble culture. Aran| heru| nar 15:26, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Shang-ding1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 22:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I have tagged Image:Xia-jue2.jpg as {{ no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. -- Geniac ( talk) 17:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Xia-jue2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot ( talk) 13:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Dongwenliang ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Geniac is a racist
Decline reason:
Attacking other editors is not acceptable behaviour. — Stwalkerster [ talk ] 18:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I know my presence here is unsolicited, but I felt it might be pertinent to this topic to inject my feelings on this matter, so *exhales*... here goes.
I'm an American citizen, but let it be said that anyone who discounts me for my nationality is a fool.
I'm born of Christian ancestry, in what was founded as a Christian nation.
I, myself, am largely agnostic, and you may credit that to a state with far too much interest in imposing societal norms onto future generations.
It is truly a terrifying thing for me to look on - in silent, wide-eyed horror - as someone suggests we return to a time where little progress was achieved.
Before you condemn the ideas of "free speech" of another nation, you might consider what imposing your own ideas onto others will cause - the result is never good.
Unfortunately, we have a double-standard of sorts that must be dealt with according to our own domestic policy: the servers are located on U.S. soil, ergo they are subject to U.S. - and only U.S. - jurisdiction. Every time you protest an image on the grounds of being "offensive", of course that "logic" will not prevail where the image is not intentionally unproductive; as Chinese laws do not apply here (would you enjoy having U.S. copyrights enforced worldwide? No? Then you see the sacrifice), the site hosting this material is under no obligation whatsoever to keep "unacceptable" images from the very people they might offend.
It's important that you understand that there are people out there who need to know that such tragedies are taking place; would you seriously relegate them to snippets of reports from Xinhua that "nothing happened" or "you don't need to see what happened here"? Perhaps you are familiar with
天安門廣場? What's "pornography" for you qualified as such for us nearly two centuries ago - before we saw the value in having current imagery to illustrate a particular problem. Please do not misunderstand my intent; I do not mean to cause offense to you or your history. My point is simply thus: what you see as "taboo" is, to many other people - Chinese included - a vital part of the information exchange process.
Defending the denial of such blatantly pseudo-religious content-censoring dogma as being "racist" is not a new thing for me to see, but it IS the kind of depressing and destructive comment I can't stand reading, particularly given my own country's history with REAL racism.
Orethrius (
talk) 12:21, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
where did you get the template for the year you were born? i need year of the dog. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RestoreTheEmpireSociety ( talk • contribs) 02:19, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)