Welcome to Wikipedia, Dev0745! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
K6ka and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! — k6ka 🍁 ( Talk · Contributions) 17:49, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, - ( Dev0745 ( talk) 15:10, 19 October 2018 (UTC))
The following sanction now applies to you:
Topic-banned from all pages and discussions related to Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, including the associated protests
You have been sanctioned for continued POV, tendentious and disruptive editing in this topic-area, despite prior warnings.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. El_C 14:15, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Why you are trying to turn Nagpuria people into a poorly written "History of India"-type article? [1]
You have been doing this since 2018 and you were told then too, [2] [3] that your edits are not relevant to "Nagpuria people".
Why you keep adding them back? There is a talk page discussion where you never responded: Talk:Nagpuria_people#Focus.
Your text is either unsourced or irrelevant or misrepresents sources. Even your most recent addition to his page [4] is irrelevant because it is unrelated to this subject. The source does not mention "Nagpuria" anywhere. [5] Dympies ( talk) 06:13, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank for your suggestion. I was adding history of the Chotanagpur region. But I will try to remove which are irrelevant and but I think some thing are important in history section. Dev0745 ( talk) 06:21, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
I also don't think you have right to remove all important materials which are added since 2018. There are many important materials related to Nagpuria people such as names, culture, communities etc. You are not admin.. If you want any changes, then talk with admin. Dev0745 ( talk) 06:31, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
First read WP:OWN carefully. It clearly state be cautious when removing or rewriting large amounts of content, particularly if this content was written by one editor; it is more effective to try to work with the editor than against them. So large amount of written material should not be removed. You are not the only person in Wikipedia who can decide. If you have any objection, you can edit any topic, but removing so much content is against Wikipedia policy. If you have confusion, you can talk with Admin. Dev0745 ( talk) 15:22, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
You need to check the article of the people before removing them. The added person are either native speaker of Nagpuri language, or caste which speak only nagpuri language such as Chik Baraik, Nagvanshi and Routia, you can check it. Some are prominent writers, musician of Nagpuri language and they belong to the caste which speak Nagpuri language. So your claim about WP:BLP and WP:VERIFY not hold ground. Dev0745 ( talk) 02:24, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
@ Johnuniq: The whole article Nagpuria people is created by Dev0745 and the problems are that he has: 1) used unreliable sources, 2) misrepresented sources, 3) added off-topic content, 4) added unsourced content, 5) he is showing WP:OWN behavior.
Some crucial diffs:-
1) adding people's name without any sources [11] but he claimed above that he is doing it because the pages of these people say they are "nagpuria" but I have shown an example that they don't and its just Dev0745 who is adding category "Nagpuria people" in those pages without any heed to WP:CATDEF.
2) Adding information nothing to do with the subject.
[12] I already asked him about it and he is trying to justify it by replying below that "why would be this page be exception when other article of ethnic groups also talk about regional history
".
This is another example of completely off-topic addition with no relation to "Nagpuria people".
This is just same.
3) Falsifying sources. I could find many but here I am providing you with the smallest and easiest examples to judge misrepresentation:
4) Using unreliable sources. Just here he used unreliable sources like "indpaedia.com", "Jharkhand General Knowledge 2022", "okworldguru.com", in a single edit.
There should be no doubt that Dev0745 has WP:CIR issues together with the problems I mentioned. This is not even the only article he has disrupted. The damage he is causing can be reviewed only if he is under some restriction. Dympies ( talk) 13:43, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
1) Notable people are added as they are sourced. Some people's mother tongue is nagpuri. Some belongs to only nagpuri speaking caste such as Chik Baraik, Nagvanshi, Rautia. Some belongs to caste who speak Nagpuri as well as other language but they are prominent writers, musician of Nagpuri language. Is it necessary that sources will say that they are from Nagpuria community not their mother tounge is nagpuri, belongs A or B caste (nagpuri speaking caste) or prominent writers of Nagpuri language and belong to the A or B caste (which speak Nagpuri language as well as other language).
2) The proto-history is connected to Sadan or Nagpuria people as according to some histrorian Copper Hoard people were early Aryan speaker also according to Jharkhand Co-ordination committee, Sadan or Nagpuria people are early Aryan speaker. So there is a clear connection with proto-history with Nagpuria people.
3)
4) I can agree about Indpaedia, okworldguru (doesn't warranties completeness and accuracy which I read later). But do you think Jharkhand General knowledge of Prabhat Prakashan is unreliable? I think Prabhat Prakashan is leading publication. Also I have citied Psychology Press publication. Dev0745 ( talk) 15:05, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
I stated you earlier chik-Baraik, Bhogta and Nagvanshi are traditional speakers of Nagpuri language. You can check in communities section. Before accusing other about competent issue first look about your activity. You have removed huge content here
[15] without verifing it which is against Wikipedia policy. And why would be this page be exception when other article of ethnic groups also talk about regional history such as Neolithic, Indus valley civilization, copper age etc.
Punjabis,
Bengali people,
Sindhi people,
Konkani people are few examples of this. Do you think this page is exception
Dev0745 (
talk) 15:22, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
-- Ekdalian ( talk) 19:21, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
See WP:ARE#Dev0745. You can consider making a response to this report against yourself. Dympies ( talk) 15:06, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
This edit should be incorporated into the Wikipedia Love jihad article which is extended confirmed protected. Please do so!- 2406:7400:98:395:AD70:6A39:40B7:D9D5 ( talk) 09:18, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
The following sanction now applies to you:
You are indefiniely topic-banned from all pages related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, broadly construed.
You have been sanctioned for continued use of low-quality sources, misrepresentation of sources, and improper synthesis of sources, after a warning from Seraphimblade for the same behavior at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive313 § Result concerning Dev0745
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 19:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
You have been editing The Kerala Story today, in violation of the topic ban above. Did you not understand what "all pages related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan" meant, or do you think that movie is not related to India? You have been blocked for a week — a mild sanction IMO. Bishonen | tålk 08:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC).
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)