Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Advanced Configuration and Power Interface, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.
West.andrew.g (
talk) 17:46, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roger Federer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{ helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Roger Federer was changed by David Greener (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966317 on 2012-02-08T17:08:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 17:08, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
IOS jailbreaking, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.
Allens (
talk |
contribs) 16:50, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Gmail. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Ahunt (
talk) 11:57, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
In response to your feedback
Please do not do this.
Electriccatfish2 ( talk) 00:40, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Gmail. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Ahunt (
talk) 16:26, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Favonian (
talk) 16:30, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
David Greener ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I will make constructive edits from now on, never vandalize, and help people. I am changed now. David Greener ( talk) 17:00, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
David Greener ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I believe I have had enogh time to atone for my wrongdoing here on Wikipedia, namely the large amount of vandalism. I now realise I was being immature and that Wikipedia vandalism is never acceptable. I have read many Wikipedia articles on the impact of vandalism and now I see how stupid and elfish I was, to vandalise a learning resource used by millions of people for no benefit whatsoever. If I was to be unblocked I would be a good and constructive editor from now on.
Accept reason:
3.5 years seems like a more believable period than 41 minutes ;-) I've unblocked your account, welcome back. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 17:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)