Hi Darnburn98, Can we be wikifriends? -- Sleinadkcaj ( talk) 15:20, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We have compiled some guidance for new healthcare editors:
Once again, welcome, and thank you for joining us. Please share these guidelines with other new editors.
– the WikiProject Medicine team
Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 20:08, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Just for your information: I've removed the info you added to Insomnia "regarding classification of an identified insomniac." I think you didn't read Thorpy's paragraph carefully enough. As I read it, the list you added was of research topics, not patient diagnoses.
But I found another use in the same section for the Thorpy source :) and reformatted the reference somewhat. In fact, what I first noticed about your edit was the (apparent) date of Thorpy's paper: today. That almost couldn't be correct.
Keep on learning! There are lots of medical articles needing small or large improvements and all-too-few "medical editors" here.
Cheers, Hordaland ( talk) 01:37, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Reply to Hordaland, appreciate your conversion of my edit, did not realise that the context was about research topics. However I have been thanked by administrator status wikipedians for my edit. This possibly shows that I was right to add the edit to this section. So should my edit remain or not in your opinion?
Thank you for the message, Darnburn98 ( talk) 14:31, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the comment. I have made a few changes since your comment, might be worth checking out. If the article is declined or classified as a stub, how can I get other wikipedians to help out since it wont be in the main space? (New to wikipedia, still learning in the deep end) Thanks! Darnburn98 ( talk) 14:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 18:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rotatope is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rotatope until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnBlackburne words deeds 03:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
The article Cubinder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable; not a standard mathematical term; all references are not reliable sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Adumbrativus (
talk) 03:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cubinder until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Adumbrativus ( talk) 07:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)