This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any comments to the current talk page. |
Your Imperial Majesty, I am honored to present you with the imperial crown jewels of Wikipedia editing. May you wear them well. Durova Charge! 05:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Hi. I suspect this user has more socks: User:Booshaklla, User:AbbyWrickler, User:Earlofyens, and User:Dime ond. — Jeff G. ( talk| contribs) 06:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC) reply
i was wiki-flying by your userpage, and saw you had a link to the time - did you know that you can just say 'the time in adelaide is 08:20'? - I would have been cheeky and thrown it in for you, but your page is protected...
happy easter!
Petesmiles 06:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC) reply
I think you hit the big red button on the wrong tab there. :) MER-C 11:09, 9 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 15 | 9 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:53, 10 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Hi. Quick question along the checkuser/long-term vandal lines. I am getting ready to strike at a small sock ring which is making small year-of-birth edits claiming they are based on references that don't seem to exist: [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]... Does this type of behavior sound familiar to you from your WP:RFCU work? It does to me but I can't recall which case. — Wknight94 ( talk) 03:05, 11 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Hi, we spoke before when you protected Opera. I have a problem with an anon editor using IP 86.129.72.81 editing Diana Damrau who repeatedly removes wikify tags. What would be the best way of handling this? Thanks. - Kleinzach 15:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC) reply
I'd been confusing your username with the banned critic of Wikipedia. Is this an unintentional similarity?-- h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 01:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC) reply
I think I'm getting a bit agitated....Or maybe Brett Lee really is the best player ever. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 08:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Encountering some difficulty, WP:NPA from WP:SPA, at 2 DYKs, Mind Dynamics, nom on April 10, and Holiday Magic, nom on April 12. The Mind Dynamics nom was suggested by Howcheng, so this should be fine. Please note that virtually every single fact and indeed every single sentence within both of those articles are backed up by in most cases multiple citations from reputable secondary sources. Smee 21:03, 12 April 2007 (UTC). reply
Well, maybe some carrots would help. ;-P — SlamDiego 06:08, 13 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Daniel,
Thanks for taking a look at the Horizon Science Academy page. I was disappointed that it was rejected for mediation. Is this because I formatted the "mediation request" incorrectly or because the other party did not respond? If it was formatted incorrectly, could you please provide a link so that I could do it correctly? If it is because of non-response, what is the next step that I should take with this fellow deleting all my comments? - Mvblair 13:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC) reply
I noticed you supported the Everton FA status I've now given it a specific date request here as its the date Everton won the Cup Winners Cup. Please comment on it if you agree! SenorKristobbal 18:18, 13 April 2007 (UTC) reply
The Page is related to an article you closed and deleted. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Beer & Hot Wings Morning Show, The result was del `'mikka 17:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC), however the article still exists. -- Master pedia 03:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC) reply
basically you destroyed a whole bunch of well written and researched content, you didn't perform the suggested merge, and you went with a majority that lacked a consensus. i'nm new at wikipedia so you tell me -- what is the point of writing & editing if ur work just gets deleted?? its not like it was unnotable or PoV! ChampagneComedy 06:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC) reply
My hands were tied, so now it's up to editorial consensus, not deletionary consensus, as to what to readd. I hope all of you can reach an amicable solution so the main, featured article can be unprotected as soon as possible. Cheers, Daniel Bryant 06:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC) replyI cannot merge content back into this article as of present, as it is protected due to a dispute over this very content. An editorial comprimise over what content to readd back into the article (note: the content is still in the history of South Australian general election campaign, 2006, see this), if any, should take place on the talk page of South Australian general election, 2006 and be implemented after disputes are resolved (and protection lifted).
An editor has asked for a deletion review of South Australian general election campaign, 2006. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ChampagneComedy 07:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Daniel Bryant, User:Striver has created, and no doubt will continue to create, a very large number of articles of this nature. [7] The common denominator is that they are not cited to reliable sources, and vary between researchy pitting of Shi'a vs. Sunni to blatant anti-Sunni polemic. Striver has rightly identified AfD as critically weak relative to the quality control processes on well-trafficked articles, and has exploited this to create a Striverpedia-within Wikipedia of OR/POV scriptural interpretation. On AfD, people might be deterred or baffled by the apparantly exotic subject matter. There seems to be no way to put a stop to this chronic disruption. Proabivouac 08:27, 15 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Thank you so much for your beautiful words and your warm welcome. I can't say in words how much they meant to me :)
E-mail sent your way! I hope we talk again soon.
Thank you for your help on saving the Bruce Haslingden article from deletion. I grealty appreciate it. Chris 20:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Much of the content is a straight reproduction from Hindutva propaganda/ Hindutva pseudoscience which was deleted per WP:DRV and WP:AFD. Baka man 21:01, 15 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Hey Daniel; I see you're suffering from a lack of motivation - it happens to the best of us, and for somebody of your activity, it's expected ;) don't *rush* back, because we want a fully refreshed Daniel, even if it means waiting longer!
Kind regards,
anthony[
cfc 23:49, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
reply
Couldn't find the application form. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 07:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Well, in the case of the initial closures, I checked with the closing Admin, who agreed to the reversion. If he hadn't, I would have reported him. Since in the second event, this user was not an Admin, I reverted it again. But do you think you could give User:YechielMan some advice on the subject, since he seemed curious as to how to know when to make such decisions and when not? FrozenPurpleCube 14:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC) reply
In reference to the Buffalo Soldier article, the user Beetstra has a bot called Shadowbot which is automatically deleting external links which I am trying to provide on the site for additional credible sources of information. The user Beetstra refuses to add the members.aol link The Buffalo Soldier Story which is featured on the official Fort Leavenworth Buffalo Soldier Monument website: http://garrison.leavenworth.army.mil/sites/about/Buffalo.asp therefore it should be credible to add on the Wiki site since the logic that the U.S. Army has approved it for their external link it should be on the Wiki site as well.
In addition this user has tried to add a linkfarm on the site, where all of the articles are valid and credible sources of information in reference to the article.
-- Signaleer 18:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 16 | 16 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:51, 17 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Hey, Is your real name really Daniel Bryant? King Lopez Contribs 08:52, 17 April 2007 (UTC) reply
No worries, matey! Sorry about the late reply, I went offline pretty much immediately after the block. Hopefully he didn't come back? – Riana ऋ 13:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Good afternoon. I'd like to offer to you my sincerest and deepest apologies for my recent copying of your user page; the fact that I know you're quite protective of your user page design is something I knew beforehand, and proceeding to impede on it is quite frankly, unacceptable on my part. My apologies.
Of all the Wikipedians I respect on the encyclopedia, you are certainly high up the list - and offending you, causing you upset or anger is not something I wish to do, and I have taken actions to amend this. Hopefully my request for speedy deletion of User:Anthony cfc/Userpage/Base is to your satisfaction.
On a further note, my closing of a MfD as delete shouldn't have been done, and I thank you for - rather strictly ;) - bringing it to my attention is something I am grateful of.
Whilst you're in the process of imparting to me advice - e.g., at my talk page - I was wondering if I could enquire into a section of your comment: ...put frankly, I'm getting sick of it, and your general behaviour on Wikipedia is reaching RfC stages..." - if possible, could you spare a few words specifying "general behaviour"? The last thing I wish to do is harm this encyclopedia, especially through my conduct, and general behaviour indicates a rather widespread problem that requires rectification as soon as possible.
Once again, my sincerest apologies - although the plan was actually to convert to something a bit different, the fact that I even saved a page with copy and pasted text from your user space remains unacceptable.
My kindest regards,
anthony[
cfc 15:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
reply
See User talk:Daniel.Bryant/Archive/31#Dispute_needs_to_be_resolved_on_the_Buffalo_Soldier_article and User talk:Armed Blowfish#Dispute_needs_to_be_resolved_on_the_Buffalo_Soldier_article.
Do you think any further help is needed on the subject, or should I consider the topic resolved as well?
Thanks,
Armed Blowfish (
mail) 23:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
reply
Hi Daniel , many thanks for your help on creating the account. i guess now i can start using/contributing. -- BrightStar 02:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC). reply
Fine... I'll ask nicer... Why do I have to be blocked, when I am backed up on that I'm not the only one who has had a problem with Durin? -- Spawn Man 03:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC) reply