Navigation
|
|
This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DanMP5. |
Yes I have seen this, althoguth I wasn;t aware it was such a problem. It is related to WP:AWB general fixes: I will pring it up sith the devlopeers and measurement specialists to see what can be done. Rich Farmbrough 10:10 4 March 2009 (UTC).
Regarding your marking of it with the advert flag - shouldn't you be at least commenting on it on the talk page if you're going to flag it as such? Give some reasons for the flagging and suggest some ways to improve the article. MobileOak ( talk) 22:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Dan you may wish to comment here. Rgds, Rich Farmbrough, 22:40 23 April 2009 (UTC).
Please stop. If you continue to edit disruptively and turn back portions of page content, which have been argumentively removed from Wikipedia("Modern Firearms doesn't provide any information worthy for reference, in the case of this weapon." ; "The Czech variant is a different weapon after all. The cartridge, the weapon itself, the name!"), as you continue doing at AVB-7.62, you will be blocked from editing. About the Infobox : when there is a data we will let it in, not before that! By the way, i'm the one who created this article! 217.10.252.131 ( talk) 09:25, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
If i can clear it out a bit : the reliable Modern Firearms doesn't have a single picture of the AVB-7.62 realy! It has photos of the Czech variant and the AB-7.62, and they are not the AVB-7.62 for sure! Also, a large portion of all the information is about them, not the AVB-7.62! Again, the Czech variant is not the same weapon, the name is different : LCZ B20, the weapon doesn't look exactly the same, and the cartridge isn't the same. This is just a weapon based on the AVB-7.62. We can't link together all weapons that are related somehow. About the info box, what a mess! When there's a data of all that in there, than it should be placed, not now, hampering the page for the editors! Now, do we have concensus! 217.10.252.132 ( talk) 19:14, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
I think I was the one that searched for and found the spelling as "Kelgren" but the patent does, indeed, have two "L"s. I'll poke around and see if I can come up with something more definitive. -- Nukes4Tots ( talk) 06:41, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Have you already gotton my masage as follws?; Hallo, Mr.nicename DanMP5. I'm Japanese. I'm very disappointed. Icannot understand what you say,”vandalism and experiment”. Japanese Wikipedia "ロケット" = "rocket" http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%AD%E3%82%B1%E3%83%83%E3%83%88 It says that "The rocket is a device that shoots a part of own mass backward, and gains power (thrust) in the reaction." That is conservation of momentum. And English Wikipedia "Momentum" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%
English Wikipedia "Newton's cradle" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_cradle
Do you accurately understand these theories? I'm been a mechanical designer for 30 years,and worked in the gun-maker before. If you want to disagree with me,you all boys should do it with physical theoty,immediately. Or,I can require Mr.Sheldon Rampton to explain persecution by you. thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 昔神童今心房細動 ( talk • contribs)
I never acknowledge what you say.Because,I believe that you two gentlemen understood my protest written by your language. Please see the diff of 11:59, 9 June 2009. you two can Probably find out that just two characters were changed by me. IS that vandalism? It my new question. Please study faithful-english,like this-"Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism." I cannot believe you two recognize the conservation of momentum. Please explain the conservation of momentum with decreased effective mass by partial differential equation.Why don't you two gentlemen come to Japan for the purpose of acquiring knowledge of Robot and Physics? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 昔神童今心房細動 ( talk • contribs) 15:34, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Throughly referenced material? Are you serious? Your idea of FACT is what makes wikipedia, in the view of many nothing more then a blog for the creative whims of those with nothing better to do then add conjecture to articles. I have made edits based on FIRST HAND knowledge, something that I assure you YOU DO NOT HAVE on this topic. Lets take a look at one for instance; congress approved Multicam for a unit? This demonstrates a fundemental lack of knowledge of the process of equipment acquisition and issue, how about another. Natick Soldier Center and subordinate directorates selcted the UCP. Wrong again my edit happy friend, NSC is one in a chain of research and development facilities which passes information along to come to a final decision. And my personal favorite, ACUPAT. That actually made me and my co workers laugh, one because it is ridiculous and two because whoever wrote it (or continues to re-post it; that would be you) thinks it's an actual term! The list goes on, that being the case I will continue help the rest of the wiki user community by posting CORRECT information. And I am sure for your part you will continue to stand by your incomplete and misleading information based on your self percieved expertise, which I promise you you have NONE based on your need to cling to abstracts from mid study reports and out dated presentations. I look forward to our mutual right to continue editing this article and HOPE that this might propmt you to look harder at this issue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ReviewerUSA1 ( talk • contribs) 12:33, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
DanMP5, I don't suppose you could send me an e-mail, there's something important that I'd like to talk with you about. It involves a number of other people too, and we'll be discussing something I think you'll want to be a part of.-- LWF ( talk) 01:34, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, about number of SVT 40 build i think it was more than 1.6 mil. I have one and it's number is 2'227'514 (ФБ7514 means "22"+"2"+"7514") and it was build on 1942.
Also Steve Kehaya on this book (sks carabine) speak about 6.000.000 of AVT38/40 was build from 1939 to 1945. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uzz75 ( talk • contribs) 20:39, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
I can send you 2 page scan from a book ad a picture of my svt40 s/n. My email is [email protected] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uzz75 ( talk • contribs) 11:30, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Uzz75 (
talk •
contribs) Just asking for your help. It appears the editor that added the 'notoriaty' section to the article is prepared to engage in an edit war over it's inclusion. I believe we may be in agreement that it degrades the quality of the article. I'm prepared to do what I can to keep it out but may need some assistance in building editorial consensus.-- Lepeu1999 ( talk) 12:49, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
I finally got around to having a look at those article you flagged up. I prodded two, redirected another, and adding sources to the last. See WP:PROD for how to propose an article for deletion if the deletion looks uncontroversial. I use Twinkle scripts to automate a lot of these processes, it makes editing Wikipedia so much easier. Fences& Windows 01:07, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey Dan, since it seems Bentedh has come back, here's a list of the IPs he's used in the past: User:86.20.160.24, User:81.108.211.71, User:78.151.105.180, and User:92.27.151.102. This ought to be helpful if today wasn't an isolated incident and he's starting up again, and since I'm going offline tomorrow I might as well get this documented so it won't take any page history trawling to find them.-- LWF ( talk) 21:20, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello Dan ! I just noted the above message. So i drop the same message which i left for LWF also to your attention:
Please keep an eye on this user (turk-user). I have noted several international edits [1] - [2] which are supposed to be vandalism. Regards from de:Portal:Waffen -- Gruß Tom ( talk) 02:50, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
P.S. I allowed myself to add my entry in WikiProject_Firearms#Active_members (#38) -- Gruß Tom ( talk) 03:24, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Note blocks for Macgyver-bd 896 in tr:wp (copied from here): 2009-10-10T18:34:31: Homonihilis (account creation blocked) expiry time: 2009-10-17T18:34:31 (#8-Telif ihlali ve intihal) + special edits: [5] [6] Regards -- Gruß Tom ( talk) 20:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
He has been blocked in turk wikipedia till today. Just now his makes IP edits: [7] (same in germany). If this continues we might block this turk IP-Range. I also asked this turk admin for help. Regards -- Gruß Tom ( talk) 10:33, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Dan ! de:Ruger SR9 should be nice now - your opinion ? -- Gruß Tom ( talk) 23:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello - I replied to your message on this talkpage.-- TParis00ap ( talk) 16:15, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Who the hell are you??? and i demand a reason to why you removed my edited changes and important information. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
67.84.36.43 (
talk) 21:00, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
I don't recall editing RPD and what do you mean by vandilism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Perfect Editor ( talk • contribs) 06:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi DanMP5 ! Please keep an eye on this case. Regards -- Gruß Tom ( talk) 00:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
If you disagree on something you can use the Discussion page and let the people decide. Until then, you DO NOT delete anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.80.132.154 ( talk) 07:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Dan, seeing as you reverted my edit, I would appreciate your input here. Falcon5nz ( talk) 08:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi ... I see you reverted my edit at the Bushmaster page. I have a different view, but not a strong enough one on its entry there to spend more time discussing.
But could you do me a favor at the Lloyd Woodson article? I think that it could benefit from an added photo or two of the type of rifle(s), .50 caliber ammunition (esp hollow point), grenade launcher, etc., but am not sure which of the available pix would make most sense. Could you take a glance, as this seems to be an area of your expertise, and let me know what pic or pix make most sense to add to that article? Most people don't know what the arms/ammunition look like, so a visual would help here. Many thanks.-- Epeefleche ( talk) 22:43, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)