FYI - related to Martian geyser: NASA's Mars Geyser Hopper. BatteryIncluded ( talk) 14:44, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Why did this need reverting? I suppose what I would really like answered is the second sentence of my edit summary. In other words, wouldn't it be more useful to link to the currently active merging process? If so, is the desired link Wikipedia:Proposed mergers or something else? -- SoledadKabocha ( talk) 02:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I'm wondering what should I do since Neosiber keep removing referenced and relevant information claiming it is "gossip". I don't want to start edit warring, especially because I nominated Cher for featured article. Could you help me? Lordelliott ( talk) 08:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi! Some editors have been constructively editing "Element 115 in pop". Those were modest contributions, but much more can be done to the expansion of content and other improvements. Hopefully this will continue over the years as would be expected for any regular article. As you have been actively involved with the theme, your considerations would be appreciated (as usual). Eka-bismuth ( talk) 13:45, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
For your coments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Akin rape and pregnancy comment controversy. Bearian ( talk) 16:54, 14 November 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kulindroplax, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chaetoderma ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Penis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 02:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
I don't mind it going to AfD too much. I think it is an interesting topic that could have a long term WP:EFFECT. I have thoughts on wanting to work with the article long term and make it a GA and then perhaps a FA. It seems like a challenge for such a controversial article. That said, one thing that was going to happen was an AfD. It happened, and so be it. Casprings ( talk) 03:40, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
On 21 November 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kulindroplax, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Kulindroplax is the first known mollusk showing an unambiguous combination of exterior shells and a worm-like body? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kulindroplax. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:03, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
No need to go to afd. I couldn't find any solid third party sources. If you've found some, just add them and I'll let it be.-- Scott Mac 16:57, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 4 Vesta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Itokawa ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:29, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For exhibiting rational judgement on a certain list which caused considerable overreaction and worse case scenario concerns. ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 19:07, 27 November 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks for the helpful links Cyclopia. I'd added other comments but they didn't seem to go on my user page, not sure what I did wrong, Chrys Chryspatterson ( talk) 10:25, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
and I will look into writing a book about my father Willie Patterson, to find out what happened back in the late 1960's in the corridors of Fleet Street. After my dad's contract was terminated in 1969 he didn't speak again to Sydney Jordan. He was always a very principled person, could be arrogant, it runs in our family, not a bad thing, in my opinion, but useful also to have a lot of resilience. Which maybe he didn't have so much of. Chryspatterson ( talk) 10:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi, you've tagged Peppered moth evolution#Controversy but so far haven't explained your reasoning on the article talk page. Please present proposals for improving the article, . dave souza, talk 18:57, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Prometheus (film). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 03:15, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Cyclopia. You deleted my statement on the talk page of the Mister X. article. I find it odd that, while I too called for the political 'color' being stripped, you delete my statement in full and then go on to state the same viewpoint, essentially. I do not feel like adding the same statement in there again, so you win, but I do feel that bluntly deleting someone else's viewpoint -- which I did not formulate in a harassing manner, as far as I recall -- is not the way to go. You could have used my talk page to share your point of view and convinced me to edit my original statement instead.
I still feel that the article is (and will be) seriously lacking in reputable originating sources (as I stated in my new comment on the relevant talk page), since it all comes down to this personal blog that might even have conjured it all. Therefore, I am still in full support of deletion. On a humorous note, I would be OK with moving it to the conspiracy theory aggregator page. :)
Kindest regards, Mfhulskemper ( talk) 19:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello Cyclopia! I've responded to your comments at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#Propose adding guidance on etymology sections. Cheers. Kaldari ( talk) 22:27, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Hey all :).
I'm dropping you a note because you've been involved in dealing with feedback from the Article Feedback Tool. To get a better handle on the overall quality of comments now that the tool has become a more established part of the reader experience, we're undertaking a round of hand coding - basically, taking a sample of feedback and marking each piece as inappropriate, helpful, so on - and would like anyone interested in improving the tool to participate :).
You can code as many or as few pieces of feedback as you want: this page should explain how to use the system, and there is a demo here. Once you're comfortable with the task, just drop me an email at okeyeswikimedia.org and I'll set you up with an account :).
If you'd like to chat with us about the research, or want live tutoring on the software, there will be an office hours session on Monday 17 December at 23:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office connect. Hope to see some of you there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 23:22, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Finite-difference time-domain method. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 04:15, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Aw, thanks. -- Cyclopia talk 11:21, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bawitius, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scales ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:11, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
File:Happy New Year 2013.jpg | Have an enjoyable New Year! | |
Hello Cyclopia: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable
New Year! Cheers,
Northamerica1000
(talk) 19:13, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ganoine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tissue ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:24, 1 January 2013 (UTC)