Gracias por las referencias. I hope they'll be useful :-)
It's a pity not to see you soon here, but it's possibly more fruitful to invest time in real life than in this virtual battleground. Best regard and hope to see you soon. --
Ecemaml (
talk) 13:02, 2 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Arbcom case
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Gibraltar and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Hello Cremallera. Your evidence on the above page stands at over 1300 words. The limit is 1000. Please refactor it within the next 24 hours or a clerk will do it for you. Regards, RyanPostlethwaiteSee
the mess I've created or
let's have banter 13:38, 16 March 2010 (UTC)reply
999 words I make it now, so good work! :-) If you need anymore help or advice, please don't hesitate to contact me. I can assure you that you're not being a pain! RyanPostlethwaiteSee
the mess I've created or
let's have banter 19:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC)reply
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted:
Any uninvolved administrator may, in his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor editing
Gibraltar or other articles concerning the history, people, or political status of Gibraltar if, after a warning, that editor repeatedly or seriously violates the behavioral standards or editorial processes of Wikipedia in connection with these articles.
Gibnews (
talk·contribs) is topic-banned from editing the
Gibraltar article and other articles concerning the history, people, and political status of Gibraltar, broadly construed, for one year. Should Gibnews return to editing relating to Gibraltar following this period, he is reminded to edit in accordance with the principles discussed in this decision and will be subject to the discretionary sanctions remedy should he fail to do so.
Gibnews is strongly warned that nationally or ethnically offensive comments are prohibited on Wikipedia and that substantial sanctions, up to a ban from the site, will be imposed without further warning in the event of further violations.
Justin A Kuntz (
talk·contribs) is topic-banned from editing
Gibraltar and other articles concerning the history, people, and political status of Gibraltar, broadly construed, for three months. Should Justin A Kuntz return to editing relating to Gibraltar following this period, he is reminded to edit in accordance with the principles discussed in this decision and will be subject to the discretionary sanctions remedy should he fail to do so.
Ecemaml (
talk·contribs) is admonished for having, at times, assumed bad faith and edited tendentiously concerning the history and political status of Gibraltar.
Editors are reminded that when editing in subject areas of bitter and long-standing real-world conflict, it is all the more important to comply with Wikipedia policies such as
assuming good faith of all editors including those on the other side of the real-world dispute, writing with a
neutral point of view, remaining
civil and
avoiding personal attacks, utilizing
reliable sources for contentious or disputed assertions, and resorting to
dispute resolution where necessary.
Any editor who is closely associated with a particular source or website relating to the subject of
Gibraltar or any other article is reminded to avoid editing that could be seen as an actual or apparent attempt to promote that source or website or to give it undue weight over other sources or website in an article's references or links. To avoid even the appearance of impropriety, it may be best in these circumstances to mention the existence of the source or website on the talkpage, and allow the decision whether to include it in the article to made by others.
[2] The topic ban is not a blanket excuse, please stop following my contributions. You and your friends are getting creepy. Justintalk 11:34, 25 May 2010 (UTC)reply
Which I have respected, a sub putting into Gibraltar 10 years ago is very oblique even for "broadly construed". Your message on the talk page strikes me as intimidating. You would have been better served querying an arb before trying to "lecture". Now again please leave me alone, I trust I won't have to ask again. Justintalk 11:55, 25 May 2010 (UTC)reply
Dispute resolution survey
Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite
Hello Cremallera. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.
Please click
HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.
You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated
research page. StevenZhangDR goes to Wikimania! 02:27, 6 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Clarification motion
A case (
Gibraltar) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the
discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --
S Philbrick(Talk) 21:57, 27 October 2014 (UTC)reply