![]() | This user may have left Wikipedia. Condem has not edited Wikipedia since 7 May 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Please click here to leave me a new message.
I generally like to keep conversations intact, so please watch this page if you leave a comment. |
![]() Archives |
---|
boo hoo im gutted —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Steeley001 ( talk • contribs) 17:59, November 30, 2006.
Thanks! :-D FreplySpang 16:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
In case you don't have it watched, I replied on my talk page. editor review me!- T e ckWiz Talk Contribs # of Edits 15:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
A birthday message for you on behalf of the Birthday Committee. -- Extranet ( Talk | Contribs) 01:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Happy Belated B-day, Condem, from the Birthday Committee!!--
Too Boy Crazy 22:50, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
www.aerobatics.org.uk ....... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Uva.ceo ( talk • contribs) 19:21, January 23, 2007.
Hey I thought your comment was funny. :-) So I hereby present you with this:
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
I award you this barnstar for a laugh. Regards, Hús ö nd 05:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC) |
Cheers,
Hús
ö
nd 05:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I've come across you at RC patrolling. I see you've done lots of vandal fighting and other useful things. Have you ever considered running for an adminship? If you want, I can nominate you. Regards, -- Tone 14:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
You need to warn users more than once before leaving them the final warning, especially when there have been no warning on their talk pages. Reporting them for vandalism after leaving a single warning on their talk page is considered newbie biting. I have reverted you on the Admin intervention against vandalism page. Please take note. Regards, — Nearly Headless Nick 15:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
It happens a lot. Especially with the lag time in wikipedia right now. -- Kukini 17:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Yea, that one must of slipped by. I've been trying to warn multiple vandals at once, that probably had something to do with it, thanks for the heads up, appreciate it. I'll be more careful from now on. Bmg916 02:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I put the cats in alphabetical order just because it's easier to see at a glance if a certain category is already in place, particularly when the list gets longer. I took out the "Mika" after the pipe because, as I understand it, that is just for sorting into the right order on the category page. As the title of the page is Mika (singer), the article will alrady come under "M" on category pages. It's only necessary to sort then when, for example, you have a first name and a surname. Then you can add "|Surname, First name" which will then put the article under the relevant letter on the category page for the surname. I hope that makes sense. Like I said, that's as far as I understand it, I could be wrong... Belovedfreak 18:40, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Random ought to redirect to Randomness, but for some reason it redirects to Random (disambiguation). What's going on? ConDem Talk 20:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
hi i edited the article loughmore as i happen to know the area. i'll give you any information on loughmoe castle i can —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rigger30 ( talk • contribs) 21:32, February 18, 2007 (UTC)
who fucken cares if u fucken block me Come on block me from editing!!!! I DARE YOU —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.194.50.80 ( talk) 09:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC).
Hey. I'm just dropping you a message to thank you for the quick requested move action and for leaving me a note. I did not jump in the discussion, as I thought maybe I, as a Finn, had overestimed how well "Mika" is known as a name outside Finland and Japan, so I wanted to see other editors' thoughts first. Thanks, Prolog 22:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[1] I think you meant "keep"? -- Maxamegalon2000 02:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
I saw your AfD on the Rikers, and would appreciate your vote on the following articles, which are also about reality tv non-entities.
Leonid the Magnificent , Rappin' Granny, Tyler MacNiven, Sarah Reinertsen, Ron Young, Kandice Pelletier, Alison Irwin, Fred Holliday, Kendra Bentley, Tyler Denk & James Branaman. All the best & thanks -- MacRusgail 03:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
hey man
i was trying to make aware that someone had put something there about prostitutes when btw wasn't me bro. So thats y i wrote something so u guyz would realise :P —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.236.192.154 ( talk • contribs) 07:20, February 22, 2007 (UTC)
no change or revision by this user. I have a dynamic ip address, not a static one, could this have been done by others? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.57.150.200 ( talk • contribs) 23:21, February 22, 2007 (UTC)
The past 24 hours have not been my best on Wikipedia, and the cookie was most thoughtful and appreciated. It didn't taste too bad, either. Thanks again for both noticing and passing on your comments. Alansohn 17:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
To be perfectly honest I'm getting so disillusioned by the lowest common intellectual denominator approach in wikipedia I'm just going to take the BSS page off my watchlist. Do what you want with it. ALR 18:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Nope, you're right, I meant to use either WP:NAME or WP:COMMONNAME, both of which support the most common form of a name. My addled brain defaulted to WP:UE, which is sort of tangentially similar if you stretch it really hard. Actually, I've been at (and lurking about) a few move requests, like arguments over whether foreign words should be translated into "normal talk", whether foreign names should be allowed to use "funny squiggles", and whose variety of English is better. Meh. What are you going to do. Thanks for the point-out, tho'. -- SigPig | SEND - OVER 18:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
My message and responses copied from User talk:BrownsFanForLife
Hi there, please read my note at Talk:Myachi. Please don't take offense, but the copyright violation problem is extremely important, and so the information had to be removed. Also, some of it was written like an advert, rather than an encyclopedia article. I know you claim to be the founder of Myachi, but unfortunately any advert-like material put up by the company or representative is likely to be thought of as spam, and spam edits will be reverted. Continual spamming might result in a block. Anyway, Myachi might well be notable enough to be on Wikipedia - but this musn't be an advert or a how-to guide, but an encyclopedia article. ConDem Talk 03:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support on my RfA. It passed with 55/0/0. I'll try my best to be worthy of the trust the community has put in me. If there are any of my actions you have a problem with or a question about, please feel free to discuss this with me and if needed to revert me. If there is anything else I can help you with (backlogs, comments, ...), you can always contact me on my talk page. Fram 15:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
The tabs at the top of each page have been replaced by additions to the side bar, above the Main page link. Any idea what's going on? ConDem Talk 13:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello there,
I am trying to add a page about Catherine Forde a children's author. It's not overt publicity just information about how she was discovered and what she writes about.
There are lots of informative pages about other authors such as Michael Morpurgo, Quentin Blake, Lemony Snicket etc and I hoped to create one for Catherine.
I added an article yesterday but it hasn't yet materialised. Can you advise how long it might take, it doesn't seem to have been deleted?
Thank you - all wisdom gratefully receieved.
Jessica
hi i was just wondering if you actually went to manwoods or dover grammar because I left manwood's last year and didn't really think we had a sporting rivalry with dgb at all. Hypnoticmonkey 19:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
![]() | Just a happy Birthday message to you, Condem, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
-- Nadir D Steinmetz 11:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
SailorAlphaCentauri ( talk) 16:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)u fag dont post stoopid shit like this again you stuck up snotty son of a bitch suck my dick u ho —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loco4240 ( talk • contribs) 17:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Thegravemed.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 15:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
-- Nadir D Steinmetz 19:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tu(big).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 02:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Condem...I am currently in the process of writing a user box for all of the colleges that are part of Oxbridge. This template is meant to replace your current college template. Please take a look at the work in progress and comment on it. My main concerns are college abbreviations and color choice. I am using scarf colors for the colleges. Thank you. - LA @ 17:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
proably would have been better if you'd photo'd the house some time other than when someone had just died. who was it anyway? Toyokuni3 ( talk) 02:08, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:OneLondonEmblem.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 10:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Versus22 talk 17:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)china should stop condemning the indian politcians.arunnachal pradesh is a part of india they dont hav right to climb it .if they continue to condem then it will end in danger —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.201.3.244 ( talk) 14:21, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello Condem! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an
Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The
biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
verifiability, all biographies should be based on
reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
874 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 05:04, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() | Happy Birthday, Condem, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a nice day! Logan Talk Contributions 21:05, 16 January 2011 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Condem. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Condem. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Reverb (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Seems to fail WP:NFILM. Tagged since April 2017.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Donaldd23 (
talk) 00:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC)