![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
I noticed that you changed an entry in the Sweetest Chant Stakes that modified the distance of a event from abt. 1+1⁄8 miles to c. 1+1⁄8 miles. According to the reference provided the distance uses the nomenclature of "About" not "circa". Hence I have reverted those edits back as to what the distance is as given in the reference. Brudder Andrusha ( talk) 14:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Colonies Chris. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Cincinnati Business Courier".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 05:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks!
Jklamo (
talk) 17:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello Chris, just wondering why you removed the publisher field from certain citations in this edit to Darebin Falcons? – Tera tix ₵ 00:58, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Can you please avoid replacing wind speeds in hurricane and tropical cyclone articles with the convert template as the winds are taken from either knots, m/s, km/h and mph and converted to both km/h and mph separately. As a result in the majority of cases, you are replacing the correct conversion with a false conversion. Thanks. Jason Rees ( talk) 13:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
disp=out
parameter), so the source value could be included in the article without being visible to the reader, if you don't want to clutter up the article with knots or any of the other possible source unit values. e.g. {{convert|80|kn|mph km/h|round=5|disp=out}}
shows as "90 mph; 150 km/h".
Colonies Chris (
talk) 14:39, 8 April 2021 (UTC)