Hi there, I've done some minor modifications to the description pages (added {{reduce}} etc.). The problem should be solved for now. Regards, →
Nagy 13:42, 17 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Thanks, But I still don't understand, the new tag you have added clearly states that the image would be deleted in 7 days unless it is reduced in size. where is the max dimensions allowed are specified? found nothing under
non-free,
Image use or under
copyrights. Can you please point me to the correct document? I have permission from the company who makes the game, but fair-use seemed to be a "easy way out" - guess not.. →
Uri ba (
talk) 14:03, 17 April 2009 (UTC)reply
forgot to mention - the images are reduced to Internet forum "standard" size (contained within 850 by 580 pixel box). →
Uri ba (
talk) 14:12, 17 April 2009 (UTC)reply
A permission to use an image just on Wikipedia is not sufficient per
WP:LICENSE, so there is no other possibility than fair-use to keep the files at the moment.
There is no deadline for resizing the images, the tag is rather a piece of advice. I also didn't find a guideline for desirable resolutions, but I assume something like 300 pixels in width would be preferable. Regards, →
Nagy 14:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Done some more digging, according to
Defining "low resolution" an acceptable size would be one that does not require wiki engine to reduce image size at the image preview page - which means up to 800*500. all but two images
File:SSM2007-KSC-PAD.jpg and
File:SSM2007-breaking_the_sound_barrier.jpg qualify under those terms. In addition I have found that the game developers have added a comment to each of the images. I think that all of those images has been proven to not breach any copyright. I'm updating the "reduced" template on all images that comply with the wiki guideline mentioned above. 10x for the help :) →
Uri ba (
talk) 15:00, 17 April 2009 (UTC)reply
RFA Thanks
RfA thanks
Thank you for participating in
my RfA, which succeeded with 56 in support, 12 in opposition and 3 neutral votes. I am truly honored by the trust that the community has placed in me. Whether you supported me, opposed me, or if you only posted questions or commented om my RfA, I thank you for your input and I will be looking at the reasons that people opposed me so I can improve in those areas :). If you ever need anything please feel free to ask me and I would be happy to help you :). All the Best,
Mifter (
talk)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)reply