This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, Chris. Could you take a look at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Wikipedia_policies_and_guidelines? I'm not technically adept enough (or, to be honest, awake enough) to figure it out, let alone fix it, but there seem to be some oddities involving template coding and closure notices. Thanks. Rivertorch ( talk) 17:40, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Bot requests. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 13:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Why is GA bot ( talk · contribs) operating so erratically. It quite often gives the same message multiple updates in a row now.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 16:35, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your report about my signature. I used the pipe templated and update Talk:Krrish. Some people have really fancy signatures, so I didn't think mine would cause any problems. Is there anywhere that shows syntax rules? BollyJeff | talk 13:15, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Multiple issues. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 13:18, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, the bot appears to be down for the last 12 hours or so. Jezhotwells ( talk) 11:34, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
The bot has lost the ability to pick up on both the "onhold" and "2ndopinion" status parameters, and treats them as simple "onreview", both on the GAN and GANR pages. Also, as noted above, it's running at erratic intervals; as I write this, it last ran just over 50 minutes ago, at 00:20 UTC. BlueMoonset ( talk) 01:14, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
They are resolved, but other things are occurring: nominations are appearing and disappearing from one bot run to the next, on hold reviews have the reviewer name disappearing and being replaced with Example, and then reappearing on the next run... The bot appears to be unsteady, with many changes happening with each run, even though the data from the talk pages for these nominations remains unchanged. There may still be some bugs to wring out from your recent rewrite. BlueMoonset ( talk) 22:01, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (technical). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 14:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
The RFC bot, on its latest trip to my talk page, deleted all the headers and notices from the page. How can I stop it from doing this? Liam987 06:26, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
The bot deleted the RFC template [1] from Talk:Brian Camelio, although we haven't received any comment... Do you have any suggestion to help us obtaining some comments? Thanks -- Edcolins ( talk) 13:59, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
The bot uses timestamps to decide when an rfc is expired. If you want the bot to stop removing the template, simply change the timestamp (i.e. remove your old sig, and sign again). Or just start a new thread. -- Chris 17:10, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Watchlist survey. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 14:15, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:American cuisine. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 06:15, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Not sure what is up with this review by example ( talk · contribs). Does it have something to do with the old review page being delted? AIRcorn (talk) 06:05, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Portal/Images/Furry. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 07:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
It appears that RFC bot ( talk · contribs) is maintaining redlinks at Wikipedia:Dashboard/Requests for comment again. (See diff) Please check to see what is causing it and if you can correct the problem. – Allen4 names 15:17, 25 May 2012 (UTC)