Hi Chicspandex! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep ( talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Chicspandex, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 21:00, 2 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Yes, you are right and correct to raise any concern. It was with great reluctance and after best part of 150 years that England adopted the Gregorian calendar. Even then, the wording of the Act that did so went through some serious linguistic acrobatics to try to avoid admitting that the RC church had had anything to do with it. So have you found something in an article [which one? Gregorian calendar, Adoption of the Gregorian calendar, Old Style and New Style dates, Dual dating?] that suggests otherwise? Obviously we don't want to repeat the doublethink but nor should we conceal anything that should be clear. Please advise. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 20:58, 2 April 2017 (UTC) reply

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask. S Philbrick (Talk) 18:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC) reply