User_talk:Camelfort References

July 2010

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:Quoladdie. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Quoladdie ( talk) 19:35, 17 July 2010 (UTC) reply

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User talk:Denniss, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- Quoladdie ( talk) 19:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC) I should also warn you that only admins can block people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Quoladdie ( talk • contribs) 19:46, 17 July 2010 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text

{{
unblock|Your reason here}}

, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Camelfort ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

Request reason:

I was stessed out. So I attacked Quoladdie's and Denniss's talk pages with blocks so I could have fun. I am very sorry about this. It will never happen again.

Decline reason:

Your first edits have been administrator impersonation, fake block messages and page blanking. Besides, this previous unblock request doesn't give me any hope that you are here to make good contributions - personally i would say that it is likely that you are not new here either. Excirial^{(
Contact me,
Contribs)} 21:55, 17 July 2010 (UTC) reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Camelfort ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

Request reason:

This is an unfair block! I am new here! I did nothing wrong! The blocking admin hates me! UNBLOCK ME IMMEDIATELY, THIS IS CENSORSHIP, I HAVE A RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH!!!

Decline reason:

Obviously, you aren't serious. — fetch · comms 22:49, 17 July 2010 (UTC) reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bonkers189 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Harrybarb ( talk) 17:50, 28 August 2010 (UTC) reply