Ah yes, that's my mistake! I somehow found you are trying to add 3000 BC, actually I was trying to remove that line (you can see edit summary Followers accept the Bhagavada Gita as historical fact and date it to 3102 BC. - Unreferenced!. So, aim of your edit and my edit was same! -- Tito Dutta (Message) 16:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC) reply

But, I have found 3 RS and added it back! You can discuss in article's talk page!-- Tito Dutta (Message) 16:49, 15 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello, BrahmanAdvaita. You have new messages at Talk:Bhagavad_Gita#Gita_Date_3102.21.
Message added 17:04, 15 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Join the discussion! Tito Dutta (Message) 17:04, 15 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Replied! -- Tito Dutta (Message) 17:18, 15 April 2012 (UTC) reply

At least new message has been posted here: Talk:Bhagavad_Gita#Can_we_please_get_rid_of_this_image_from_the_article.3F -- Tito Dutta ✉ 21:24, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply

At least one new message has been posted Talk:Bhagavad_Gita. -- Tito Dutta ✉ 22:29, 9 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Oops, date should be July 9 according to Wikipedia UTC time date, I was following my computer's time, anyway, please ignore it! -- Tito Dutta ✉ 22:30, 9 July 2012 (UTC) reply

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For your works in Bhagavad Gita article. -- Tito Dutta ✉ 22:38, 9 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello,
an SPI report has been made where you are involved. I am little bit surprised to see this SPI report, but, I neither support nor oppose it. Try to defend yourself if possible Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thigle -- Tito Dutta ✉ 00:10, 2 August 2012 (UTC) reply